May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. May 27 01:00 AM PDT  11:59 PM PDT All GMAT Club Tests are free and open on May 27th for Memorial Day! May 27 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Special savings are here for Magoosh GMAT Prep! Even better  save 20% on the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 5/27 May 30 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Application deadlines are just around the corner, so now’s the time to start studying for the GMAT! Start today and save 25% on your GMAT prep. Valid until May 30th. Jun 01 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 713
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2010, 04:13
Question Stats:
68% (02:20) correct 32% (02:26) wrong based on 33 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with 12 chips in each pile and no chips left over. After winning 12 extra chips in a hand of poker, the gambler again stacks his chips in piles, with 14 chips in each pile and no chips left over. How many chips did the gambler have before winning the hand of poker? (1) Before winning the hand of poker, the gambler had fewer than 140 chips. (2) Before winning the hand of poker, the gambler had more than 70 chips.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2010, 05:16
ykaiim wrote: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with 12 chips in each pile and no chips left over. After winning 12 extra chips in a hand of poker, the gambler again stacks his chips in piles, with 14 chips in each pile and no chips left over. How many chips did the gambler have before winning the hand of poker?
1) Before winning the hand of poker, the gambler had fewer than 140 chips. 2) Before winning the hand of poker, the gambler had more than 70 chips. Let # of piles before the winning be \(x\), so the question is \(12x=?\) Also given that \(12x+12=14y\) > \(6(x+1)=7y\) > \(x+1\) must be multiple of 7. (1) \(12x<140\) > \(x<11\frac{2}{3}\) > the only integer value of \(x\), satisfying \(x<11\frac{2}{3}\), for which \(x+1\) is a multiple of 7 is when \(x=6\) > \(12x=72\). Sufficient. (2) \(12x>70\) > \(x>5\frac{5}{6}\) > multiple values are possible for \(12x\), for instance if \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) but if \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\). Not sufficient. Answer: A. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Director
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 713
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2010, 05:23
Thanks Bunuel, but S2 is still not clear.
I think the number of piles remains same before winning 12 more chips. So, if the earlier chips = 156, then there would be 13 piles of 12 chips each. Now, adding 12 more chips, which is 168, but it (168) is not divisible by 13. So, S2 is insufficient.
I dont know where I am missing.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2010, 06:58
ykaiim wrote: Thanks Bunuel, but S2 is still not clear.
I think the number of piles remains same before winning 12 more chips. So, if the earlier chips = 156, then there would be 13 piles of 12 chips each. Now, adding 12 more chips, which is 168, but it (168) is not divisible by 13. So, S2 is insufficient.
I dont know where I am missing. # of piles before and after the winning 12 extra chips may or may not be the same. If we knew from the beginning that they are equal than \(12x+12=14x\) > \(x=6\) > \(12x=72\). So in this case statements are not needed to answer the question. Next: you are right statement (2) is not sufficient, that's why answer is A and not D. As stated in my previous post from (2) there are multiple values of x possible: If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) > \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\); If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) > \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\). Hope it's clear.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 88

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2010, 22:45
Hi Brunel, I am not able to understand as for how can the number of piles be different in the two cases.As new no of chips to be added =12(given) and the new piles will have 14 chips each then it is mandatory that to accomodate 12 chips fully to make new set of 14 chips each can be done only when initiall no of piles would be 6 only. Can you please explain with an example that contradicts that, for my understanding. Thanks in advance!!! utin Bunuel wrote: ykaiim wrote: Thanks Bunuel, but S2 is still not clear.
I think the number of piles remains same before winning 12 more chips. So, if the earlier chips = 156, then there would be 13 piles of 12 chips each. Now, adding 12 more chips, which is 168, but it (168) is not divisible by 13. So, S2 is insufficient.
I dont know where I am missing. # of piles before and after the winning 12 extra chips may or may not be the same. If we knew from the beginning that they are equal than \(12x+12=14x\) > \(x=6\) > \(12x=72\). So in this case statements are not needed to answer the question. Next: you are right statement (2) is not sufficient, that's why answer is A and not D. As stated in my previous post from (2) there are multiple values of x possible: If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) > \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\); If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) > \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\). Hope it's clear.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2010, 23:56
utin wrote: Hi Brunel, I am not able to understand as for how can the number of piles be different in the two cases.As new no of chips to be added =12(given) and the new piles will have 14 chips each then it is mandatory that to accomodate 12 chips fully to make new set of 14 chips each can be done only when initiall no of piles would be 6 only. Can you please explain with an example that contradicts that, for my understanding. Thanks in advance!!! utin Bunuel wrote: ykaiim wrote: Thanks Bunuel, but S2 is still not clear.
I think the number of piles remains same before winning 12 more chips. So, if the earlier chips = 156, then there would be 13 piles of 12 chips each. Now, adding 12 more chips, which is 168, but it (168) is not divisible by 13. So, S2 is insufficient.
I dont know where I am missing. # of piles before and after the winning 12 extra chips may or may not be the same. If we knew from the beginning that they are equal than \(12x+12=14x\) > \(x=6\) > \(12x=72\). So in this case statements are not needed to answer the question. Next: you are right statement (2) is not sufficient, that's why answer is A and not D. As stated in my previous post from (2) there are multiple values of x possible: If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) > \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\); If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) > \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\). Hope it's clear. Please read the solution carefully. Examples are given in the text you quote. # of piles before the winning \(x\), after the winning \(y\), so \(12x+12=14y\). Two possible scenarios: If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) > \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\); If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) > \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\).
_________________



Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 165

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2010, 04:03
It is really a GMAT question I dont think we need additional information from any of the two statements to solve it Question says "a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with 12 chips in each pile and no chips left over. After winning 12 extra chips in a hand of poker, the gambler again stacks his chips in piles, with 14 chips in each pile and no chips left over. How many chips did the gambler have before winning the hand of poker?" This means gambler added 2 chips (out of 12) in every pile to make it a pile of 14 from a pile of 12. That means number of piles were 12/2 = 6, because there is no left over. There cannot be any other scenario then 6 piles. so whatever information we have in both statement is basically useless (new option "F" if GMAT want to add or say both are sufficient) any comments ?
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2010, 04:13
hardnstrong wrote: It is really a GMAT question I dont think we need additional information from any of the two statements to solve it Question says "a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with 12 chips in each pile and no chips left over. After winning 12 extra chips in a hand of poker, the gambler again stacks his chips in piles, with 14 chips in each pile and no chips left over. How many chips did the gambler have before winning the hand of poker?" This means gambler added 2 chips (out of 12) in every pile to make it a pile of 14 from a pile of 12. That means number of piles were 12/2 = 6, because there is no left over. There cannot be any other scenario then 6 piles. so whatever information we have in both statement is basically useless (new option "F" if GMAT want to add or say both are sufficient) any comments ? # of piles before and after the winning 12 extra chips may or may not be the same. If we knew from the beginning that they are equal than \(12x+12=14x\) > \(x=6\) > \(12x=72\). So in this case statements are not needed to answer the question.
# of piles before the winning \(x\), after the winning \(y\), so \(12x+12=14y\). Two possible scenarios (out of many):
If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) > \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\); If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) > \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\).
_________________



Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 165

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jun 2010, 00:07
Bunuel wrote: hardnstrong wrote: It is really a GMAT question I dont think we need additional information from any of the two statements to solve it Question says " a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with 12 chips in each pile and no chips left over. After winning 12 extra chips in a hand of poker, the gambler again stacks his chips in piles, with 14 chips in each pile and no chips left over. How many chips did the gambler have before winning the hand of poker?" This means gambler added 2 chips (out of 12) in every pile to make it a pile of 14 from a pile of 12. That means number of piles were 12/2 = 6, because there is no left over. There cannot be any other scenario then 6 piles. so whatever information we have in both statement is basically useless (new option "F" if GMAT want to add or say both are sufficient) any comments ? # of piles before and after the winning 12 extra chips may or may not be the same. If we knew from the beginning that they are equal than \(12x+12=14x\) > \(x=6\) > \(12x=72\). So in this case statements are not needed to answer the question.
# of piles before the winning \(x\), after the winning \(y\), so \(12x+12=14y\). Two possible scenarios (out of many):
If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) > \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\); If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) > \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\).We cannot take x=13 (please see the highlighted part above) because if we take x=13 then its not possible to make piles of 14 chips each (Note  each pile of 14 chips). In that case gambler need 26 more chips to make it a pile of 14 chips from 12 chips. But he won only 12 chips more.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55271

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jun 2010, 02:04
hardnstrong wrote: Bunuel wrote: hardnstrong wrote: It is really a GMAT question I dont think we need additional information from any of the two statements to solve it Question says " a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with 12 chips in each pile and no chips left over. After winning 12 extra chips in a hand of poker, the gambler again stacks his chips in piles, with 14 chips in each pile and no chips left over. How many chips did the gambler have before winning the hand of poker?" This means gambler added 2 chips (out of 12) in every pile to make it a pile of 14 from a pile of 12. That means number of piles were 12/2 = 6, because there is no left over. There cannot be any other scenario then 6 piles. so whatever information we have in both statement is basically useless (new option "F" if GMAT want to add or say both are sufficient) any comments ? # of piles before and after the winning 12 extra chips may or may not be the same. If we knew from the beginning that they are equal than \(12x+12=14x\) > \(x=6\) > \(12x=72\). So in this case statements are not needed to answer the question.
# of piles before the winning \(x\), after the winning \(y\), so \(12x+12=14y\). Two possible scenarios (out of many):
If \(x=6\), then \(12x=72\) > \(12x+12=72+12=84=14y=14*6\); If \(x=13\), then \(12x=156\) > \(12x+12=156+12=168=14y=14*12\).We cannot take x=13 (please see the highlighted part above) because if we take x=13 then its not possible to make piles of 14 chips each (Note  each pile of 14 chips). In that case gambler need 26 more chips to make it a pile of 14 chips from 12 chips. But he won only 12 chips more. OK. Let me clear this once more: If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(13\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(13(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=156\). AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(156+12=168\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(168\) chips in \(12\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(12(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=168\). Another scenario possible:If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(20\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(20(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=240\). AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(240+12=252\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(252\) chips in \(18\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(18(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=252\). OR:If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(27\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(27(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=324\). AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(324+12=336\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(336\) chips in \(24\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(24(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=336\). ... OR:If # of piles BEFORE winning was \(699\), then TOTAL # of chips would be \(699(piles)*12(chips \ in \ each)=8388\). AFTER winning \(12\) chips TOTAL # of chips would become \(8388+12=8400\), which IS a multiple of \(14\). So we can redistribute \(8400\) chips in \(600\) piles \(14\) chips in EACH, \(600(piles)*14(chips \ in \ each)=8400\). ... Basically if the number of piles BEFORE winning was 1 less than multiple of 7 (see the solution in my first post), gambler would be able to redistribute chips AFTER winning in 14 chips.
_________________



VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1206
Schools: Wharton (R2  submitted); HBS (R2  submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2010, 12:01
Bunuel  hats off to you boss



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 11011

Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Aug 2017, 03:27
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: In a casino, a gambler stacks a certain number of chips in piles, with
[#permalink]
11 Aug 2017, 03:27






