Last visit was: 29 Apr 2024, 09:00 It is currently 29 Apr 2024, 09:00

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 615
Own Kudos [?]: 2933 [22]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
 Q51  V41
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93007
Own Kudos [?]: 619922 [23]
Given Kudos: 81628
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 615
Own Kudos [?]: 2933 [3]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
 Q51  V41
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 208
Own Kudos [?]: 320 [0]
Given Kudos: 10
Send PM
Re: Missing Weights [#permalink]
Both the solution mentioned above are good,

Is there any quicker way to deal with this.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 615
Own Kudos [?]: 2933 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: London
 Q51  V41
Send PM
Re: Missing Weights [#permalink]
There is one more way to do this, but that involves knowledge of a binary notation of a number (a concept not tested on the GMAT). Here is the solution :

In binary a number <=63 can be represented in 6 digits.
Of this 4 represents the 3rd digit from the right.
The number of 6 digit binary numbers possible forcing the 3rd digit to be 1 (all the numbers that need 4) is exactly 2^5 or 32
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 219
Own Kudos [?]: 160 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: USA
WE 1: Engineering
Send PM
Re: Missing Weights [#permalink]
shrouded1 wrote:
Good solution, alluding to a binary notation of a number.

Here is another way to think of the problem :

We can form :
1 {1}
2 {2}
3 {1,2}
But we cannot form any of 4 through to 7 without a 4.
So 4 numbers we cannot form up till 7

Next look at the next set of numbers from 8 to 15
Notice that this is set is nothing but :
8+{0,1,2,3,..,7}
But we know from this that we cannot form a 4,5,6,7
So if we count up till 15, there are 2x4=8 numbers in all that we cannot form

Next look at the numbers from 16 to 31
Same patter repeats
This is 16+{0,1,2,...,15}
And we know from 0,..,15 there are 8 numbers we cannot form.
So from 16 to 31 there are 8 more ... hence 2x8=16 numbers between 1 and 31

and this patter goes on ...

For numbers upto 63, it will be 2x16=32

Answer is (d)


I was doing it this way ... however, lost trach somewhere in the middle. Realize that rather than doing all the way from 1 - 63 in one go, it is better to take it in batches. Thanks.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 219
Own Kudos [?]: 160 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: USA
WE 1: Engineering
Send PM
Re: Missing Weights [#permalink]
onedayill wrote:
Both the solution mentioned above are good,

Is there any quicker way to deal with this.


Bunuel's method is faster, but needs slightly more undertstanding.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 336
Own Kudos [?]: 1824 [4]
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Send PM
Re: Missing Weights [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
shrouded1 wrote:
Here is an interesting question :

A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, 32Kg}. This set is good enough to weight any object having an integral weight betweem 1Kg and 63Kg (Eg. 19Kg = 16Kg + 2Kg + 1Kg). If the 4Kg weight is lost, how many weights between 1Kg & 63Kg can no longer be measured ?

A) 16
B) 24
C) 28
D) 32
E) 36


Originally there could be \(2*2*2*2*2*2=2^6=64\) combinations of weight. Now that we took 1 weight off, we get \(2*2*2*2*2=2^5=32\) combinations of weight.

What is lost? \(64-32=32\)

Answer: D

In case you are wondering why 2 was multiplied n times, it's because 2 represents two things: BEING SELECTED and NOT BEING SELECTED.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 170
Own Kudos [?]: 402 [0]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V45
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, [#permalink]
Here's how I thought about it: For each weight, there are two possibilities; either it's included or it's not. So, for 6 weights, there are (2*2*2*2*2*2) = 2^6 possibilities, minus 1 (the case where there are no weights) or 63 possibilities. Therefore, if we take away one of the weights, there are now 2^5 - 1 = 31 possibilities. 63-31 = 32.

Answer: D

Aside: Think about it similiarly to how you think about counting the total number of factors from a number's prime factorization: Either the factor is included or it's not.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 63
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, [#permalink]
the first thought i had was 5c0 +5c1 + 5c2 + 5c3 +5c4 +5c5 = 32. This is because i need to choose a 4 and that can be selected in the following combinations. with each one. on solving it gives me 32. 32 sets will be lost.
Hope this helps
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Oct 2019
Status:BELIEVE IN YOURSELF
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 175 [0]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: India
Send PM
Re: A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, [#permalink]
shrouded1 wrote:
A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, 32Kg}. This set is good enough to weight any object having an integral weight betweem 1Kg and 63Kg (Eg. 19Kg = 16Kg + 2Kg + 1Kg). If the 4Kg weight is lost, how many weights between 1Kg & 63Kg can no longer be measured ?

A) 16
B) 24
C) 28
D) 32
E) 36


TOTAL NO. OF WEIGHT this 6 {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, 32Kg} CAN MEASURED= 1KG TO 63KG= TOTAL 63

IF 4KG WEIGHT IS LOST

1KG______2KG_____8KG_______16KG_____32KG


\(63-(1+\frac{5!}{4!}+\frac{5!}{2!*3!}+\frac{5!}{2!*3!}+\frac{5!}{4!})=32\)

ANSWER D
Attachments

Untitled.png
Untitled.png [ 12.78 KiB | Viewed 2916 times ]

Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2019
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 129
Send PM
Re: A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, [#permalink]
My view on this problem

Sum may be seen as a result of selections of 1,2,3,4,5 elements

When weights are 6 you can have

6C1 + 6C2 +.... + 6C6= 63

After losing one you can have

5C1 + 5C2 + .... 5C5 = 31

Differences between 63 and 31 may be seen as the selection you can no more have

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32736
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A scientist has a set of weights {1Kg, 2Kg, 4Kg, 8Kg, 16Kg, [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
93007 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne