chambax wrote:
thanks for that nikhilfotedar - very reassuring.
I'm sure it doesn't affect career opportunities etc ...
It just seemed like the people I spoke with made it out to be more than a mere bias, but a major liability perceived by economists and financiers on a broad scale...
If anyone else has any thoughts I would be very grateful!
Thanks!
First, you have to distinguish between the Universtity of Chicago economics department and the Booth school of business. Many professors have joint appointments to both, but most do not.
The one thing I really like about Booth is that while they're known for liberal economics, they're very much diverse. You get Gene Fama at one end of the hall talking about how markets are ultra-rational, and at the other you get Richard Thaler, probably the most important behavioral economist alive today, talking about how irrational people make the markets by extension irrational. And I don't know what liability you could be talking about. Chicago has its shares of Keynesians as well--it's not Princeton, but you definitely won't be indoctrinated. But then again I bring up my original point: you're talking about Booth, not the economics department.
If you really want to know more about this, watch
this documentary online on behavioral econ. Notice how both sides of the leading arguments are represented at Chicago.