Let's break this down together in a way that makes sense.
Here's the key insight you need to see:When the problem says "Pat charged 1/3 as much time as Mark," it means Pat's hours = (1/3) × Mark's hours. This is often where students get tripped up - they think it means the opposite!
Let's solve this step-by-step:Since Pat's time relates to both Kate and Mark, let's use Kate's hours as our base. Call it \(K\).
Now, let's translate what we know:
- Kate worked \(K\) hours
- Pat worked twice as much as Kate, so Pat = \(2K\) hours
- Pat worked 1/3 as much as Mark, which means Pat = Mark/3
If Pat = \(2K\) and Pat = Mark/3, then:
\(2K = \frac{Mark}{3}\)
Therefore, Mark = \(6K\) hours
Notice how this makes sense - Pat works more than Kate (double), but Mark works even more than Pat (triple).
Setting up our equation:Total hours = Kate + Pat + Mark = 162
\(K + 2K + 6K = 162\)
\(9K = 162\)
\(K = 18\)
So:
- Kate: 18 hours
- Pat: \(2 \times 18 = 36\) hours
- Mark: \(6 \times 18 = 108\) hours
The question asks how many
more hours Mark charged than Kate:
\(108 - 18 = 90\) hours
Answer: DYou can check out the
step-by-step solution on Neuron by e-GMAT to master the systematic framework for solving all ratio-based word problems. The full solution shows you three alternative approaches and reveals the common trap patterns that appear in similar GMAT questions. You can also explore other GMAT official questions with detailed solutions on Neuron for structured practice
here.