Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Jul 2006, 05:57

5

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

70% (01:46) correct 30% (01:46) wrong based on 603 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?

Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 10:14

1

So let us denote the hours charged by Pat as P, Kate as K and Mark as M.

\(P + K + M = 162\)

We are told that \(P = 2K\) and \(P = \frac{1}{3}M\). The easiest way to solve a problem like this would be to convert everything to one variable, which in this case, is P.

So we get \(K = \frac{1}{2}P\) and \(M = 3P\). Substituting this into the original equation we get: \(P + \frac{1}{2}P + 3P = 162\)

This tells us that \(\frac{9P}{2} = 162\) which implies \(P = \frac{162*2}{9} = 36\)

Re: Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Mar 2011, 08:59

2

You may try my approach. It may be easier and may be faster.

P+M+K=162 we need to find M-K

Lets Kate charged 60 hours then Pat charged 60*2=120 hours Mark charged 3 times more than Pat or 120*3=360

Total 60+120+360=540. M-K= 360-60=300 Now look at the trick: We must have received 162 instead of 540 hours. and the difference (M-K) is 300 not one in the available answer choices.

Now guess what you need to do to obtain the correct answer choice? Exactly 162/540=3.33 , and 300/3.33=90.

Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.

Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business

Joined: 03 Feb 2011

Posts: 767

Re: Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

06 May 2011, 10:26

2

P + K + M = 162

P = 2K, P = 1/3M

Hence K = 0.5P and M = 3P

P + 0.5 P + 3P = 162 or 4.5 P = 162

P = 18 * 2 = 36 K = 18 M = 108 M - K = 108 - 18 = 90

naveenhv wrote:

Pat, Kate and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate and 1/3 rd as much as Mark, how many more hours did mark charge to the project than Kate?

Re: Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jan 2018, 08:22

Top Contributor

likar wrote:

Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?

A. 18 B. 36 C. 72 D. 90 E. 108

We can see that Kate charged the fewest hours, so... Let x =the number of hours Kate charged

Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate So, 2x = the number of hours Pat charged

Pat charged 1/3 as much times as Mark In other words, Mark charged THREE TIMES as much time as Pat So, 3(2x ) = the number of hours Mark charged In other words, 6x = the number of hours Mark charged

Pat, Kate and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. We can write: x + 2x + 6x = 162 Simplify: 9x = 162 Solve: x = 18 So, Kate charged 18 hours When we plug x = 18 into 6x, we see that Mark charged 108 hours

How many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate? Answer = 108 - 18 = 90 = D

Re: Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jan 2018, 11:35

GMATPrepNow wrote:

likar wrote:

Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?

A. 18 B. 36 C. 72 D. 90 E. 108

We can see that Kate charged the fewest hours, so... Let x =the number of hours Kate charged

Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate So, 2x = the number of hours Pat charged

Pat charged 1/3 as much times as Mark In other words, Mark charged THREE TIMES as much time as Pat So, 3(2x ) = the number of hours Mark charged In other words, 6x = the number of hours Mark charged

Pat, Kate and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. We can write: x + 2x + 6x = 162 Simplify: 9x = 162 Solve: x = 18 So, Kate charged 18 hours When we plug x = 18 into 6x, we see that Mark charged 108 hours

How many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate? Answer = 108 - 18 = 90 = D

can you please explain the wording of 1/3 as much time as Mark, why are you multiplying 2 by 3 ? there is a fraction 1/3 if it said "Pat charged three times as much as Mark" then i would multiply...

thank you
_________________

In English I speak with a dictionary, and with people I am shy.

can you please explain the wording of 1/3 as much time as Mark, why are you multiplying 2 by 3 ? there is a fraction 1/3 if it said "Pat charged three times as much as Mark" then i would multiply...

thank you

For most word problems, the given situation can be expressed in 2 ways. For example, saying that "Joe is 4 years older than Ann" is exactly the SAME as saying "Ann is 4 years younger than Joe"

Likewise, saying that "Peter is HALF as old as Sue" is exactly the SAME as saying "Sue is TWICE as old as Peter" And saying that "Peter is 1/3 as old as Sue" is exactly the SAME as saying "Sue is THREE TIMES as old as Peter"

Re: Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Mar 2018, 17:51

likar wrote:

Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?

A. 18 B. 36 C. 72 D. 90 E. 108

We can let P, K, and M = the amount time spent on the project by Pat, Kate, and Marck, respectively, and create the equations:

P + K + M = 162

and

P = 2K

P/2 = K

and

P = (M)(1/3)

3P = M

Substituting, we have:

P + P/2 + 3P = 162

Multiplying by 2, we have:

2P + P + 6P = 324

9P = 324

P = 36, so M = 108 and K = 18.

M - K = 108 - 18 = 90.

Answer: D
_________________

Jeffery Miller Head of GMAT Instruction

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course 500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Re: Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project.
[#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jul 2018, 05:10

1

Quote:

Pat, Kate, and Mark charged a total of 162 hours to a certain project. If Pat charged twice as much time to the project as Kate and 1/3 as much time as Mark, how many more hours did Mark charge to the project than Kate?