It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 07:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Please rate my Essay (AWA - Argument)

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 10

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2009, 00:10
Argument:
A recent nationwide study of high schools reveals that the percentage of students who graduate on time is higher for private schools than for public schools. For this reason, Bedford Falls parents who want their children to graduate from high school on time should send their children to private schools.

In this argument, the author concludes that parents who want their children to graduate from high school on time, should send their children to private school. The author's line of reasoning is through a nationwide study on high schools that says percentage of students graduating from private school is higher than that of public schools. This argument is seriously flawed due to limited information on number of schools surveyed, place, and the year this article was published.

Firstly, the credibility of the nationwide survey needs to be considered. As there is no information relating to how the survey was conducted and the parameters defining the survey, the only support to the reasoning of author's argument is weakened.

Secondly, to compare the percentage of students graduating, we need to know the 80% median percentage of students graduating from the schools. Because, there could be cases where few schools contribute very less pass percentage making the entire public schools pass percentage less than private schools.

Thirdly, the quality of education and standard could be higher in public schools making it difficult for the students to graduate on time. This means that comparing the public and private schools in survey is pretty convoluted. The author makes several assumptions in matching analysis criteria while concluding. Here, information regarding quality and standards of both public and private schools need to be considered before concluding.

In sum, the author's argument on sending children to private schools is neither persuasive nor convincing. Had it included aforementioned points, the information-starved argument would not only be made strengthened and bolstered but also persuasive and convincing.

_____________

_________________

Saravanan Raj

"Marketing is not the art of finding clever ways to dispose of what you make. It is the art of creating genuine customer value."

Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 24

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2009, 10:01
Multiple grammatical issues, but I've heard raters are more flexible on grammar for non-native speakers.

1. Number of schools surveyed
2. "Place"
3. Year the article was published

#1 seems quite relevant--though it says the survey is "nationwide" there is no mention of the number of surveyed schools. I'm not sure what "place" means but location and distribution of the schools may also affect the survey results. Year published seems irrelevant since the argument pre-empts your response by claiming that it's "recent." You may be right in pointing out the ambiguous time marker but it's not the strongest refutation you could make.

I like the topic sentence in your first paragraph, but a single sentence does not make a paragraph. Expand on your point with another sentence or two. Point out a possible counterexample or specific items that are missing from the survey. In your introduction you mentioned sample size. So point out that the sample size may be miniscule.

The second paragraph was grammatically nonsensical, though I understood fully what you were trying to say. More clearly, some public schools may have extraordinarily low on-time graduation rates. But this does not refute the argument! The argument claims that in fact, fewer students graduate on time from public schools. So you fail to make a strong claim here.

I like the idea in your third paragraph. It may well be that public schools offer a better and more difficult educational experience, and thus fewer students graduate. On the other hand, private schools may have more lenient graduation requirements possibly as a result of their private administration. BUT you failed to read the question accurately. The prompt stated that parents who wanted their children to graduate on time should send their children to private school. It NEVER says "parents who want a better education for their children." Do not be confused--the prompt asks you to analyze whether parents should send their children to private school if they want their children to graduate on time. You don't refute the argument.

Your conclusion is good if a bit formulaic. It is also rife with redundancy--"strengthened" and "bolstered" mean the same thing, whereas "persuasive" and "convincing" also mean the same thing. You should aim for more words without wordiness.

Overall I think there were serious flaws, but with a little work you can improve your AWA a lot. I encourage you to look at the AWA 6.0 guide how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html.

Here are some arguments you could have made, and which apply to most AWA Analysis prompts.
"Generalizing from particulars" -- It may be true that GENERALLY private schoolers graduate on time, but perhaps the private schools are so terrible in Bedford Falls that in Bedford Falls the public high school graduates more students on time.
"Faulty causal reasoning" aka "Confounding correlation with causation" -- It may be true that GENERALLY private schoolers graduate on time more than public schoolers, but that does not mean private school is the CAUSE of graduating on time. It may be that wealthy children are more liable to graduate on time, and wealthy parents usually send their wealthy children to private school. In fact, wealthy public schoolers are more likely to graduate high school on time than low-income private schoolers. In other words, there may be an alternate causal explanation at hand.
You did well to question the detailed methods of the survey as you did in the first paragraph.

Hope this helps.
Re: Please rate my Essay (AWA - Argument)   [#permalink] 29 Oct 2009, 10:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Please rate my argument essay!! 0 10 Aug 2014, 23:44
please rate my argument essay 0 28 Aug 2012, 20:27
Please rate my Argument essay 0 07 Jul 2012, 05:49
Please rate my argument essay 0 29 Oct 2010, 21:19
Please give feedback and a rating on my AWA Argument essay 9 18 Sep 2010, 23:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by