Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 15:34 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 15:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
piyushdabomb
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Last visit: 04 Jun 2022
Posts: 30
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 30
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
PyjamaScientist
User avatar
Admitted - Which School Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,118
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 633
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Posts: 1,118
Kudos: 1,307
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
piyushdabomb
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Last visit: 04 Jun 2022
Posts: 30
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 30
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I completely disagree with others.

GMAT/EA is a pattern matching game, and if I can identify the patterns beforehand and know the strategy to use, it will be much easier for me to attack the question.

Let's take correlation vs. causation questions for example. There are many such identifiable questions. If I know the approach/framework, it will make my life easier. For correlation/causal questions, I know that to weaken an argument, alternative options that cause Y (in X --> Y) could work. I also know that if Y causes X, that also weakens it. I also know that if X causes the opposite desired effect of Y, that also weakens my argument. I also know that if there's not enough data or I can't prove Y, that also weakens the argument.

I am so surprised that no one has taken the time to split the different questions into different question types (correlation/causation, sampling vs. generalization, statistics, analogy, etc...) and shown how to solve them using similar approaches. By doing so, it makes it MUCH easier to learn the topics.

I've read Manhattan and I've tried TTP. Unfortunately I don't see any OG questions with real breakdowns by such frameworks that make our lives easier.

Why is that if I'm doing, let's say, an "averages" question, I can find a multitude of "average" solving math word-problems, but I can't find a database of correlation/causation questions and their answers using the same approach for the same type of question? It boggles my mind!

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
189 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts