Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
I have realized that I am struggling with CR because I am not getting enough practice of similar categories of CR questions. Whenever I move from one CR question to the next, the lessons I've attempted to learn doesn't even apply to the next question. So I end up forgetting or getting overwhelmed by the different ways to attack a problem.
When I practice math topics, its much easier to structure my practice because if for example I want to practice "speed" word problems, there are so many resources to find and practice just speed problems. I can practice 10 speed rate problems and master it.
In the case of CR, I can't just run through 10 assumption or strengthen questions because each question might have a different way to attack it. I am looking for similar questions by type, not question. I don't care about doing "assumption" questions in a row. Rather, I am particularly interested in practicing, for example, a string of "correlation vs. causation" or "number vs. %" questions and master them before trying a different type of category. The frustrating problem I a finding is that I simply can't find a database of questions organized by similar "categories" of questions. If I have this, I can practice a string of CR questions and say "aha! I get the pattern. Next time I see this style of question, I know how to attack it!"
I only see types of questions by question types or by difficulty, not by question "category".
Has anyone categorised these question against what we have in the OG guide?
That's how my brain functions.
Can someone help?
Posted from my mobile device
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Whenever I move from one CR question to the next, the lessons I've attempted to learn doesn't even apply to the next question. So I end up forgetting or getting overwhelmed by the different ways to attack a problem.
Creating and regularly reviewing an error-log may be helpful to mitigate that issue.
I have realized that I am struggling with CR because I am not getting enough practice of similar categories of CR questions. Whenever I move from one CR question to the next, the lessons I've attempted to learn doesn't even apply to the next question. So I end up forgetting or getting overwhelmed by the different ways to attack a problem.
When I practice math topics, its much easier to structure my practice because if for example I want to practice "speed" word problems, there are so many resources to find and practice just speed problems. I can practice 10 speed rate problems and master it.
In the case of CR, I can't just run through 10 assumption or strengthen questions because each question might have a different way to attack it. I am looking for similar questions by type, not question. I don't care about doing "assumption" questions in a row. Rather, I am particularly interested in practicing, for example, a string of "correlation vs. causation" or "number vs. %" questions and master them before trying a different type of category. The frustrating problem I a finding is that I simply can't find a database of questions organized by similar "categories" of questions. If I have this, I can practice a string of CR questions and say "aha! I get the pattern. Next time I see this style of question, I know how to attack it!"
I only see types of questions by question types or by difficulty, not by question "category".
Has anyone categorised these question against what we have in the OG guide?
That's how my brain functions.
Can someone help?
Posted from my mobile device
Show more
Piyush, You don't need "methods" or "tricks" to be good in CR. If you are able to comprehend the passage "well". That's all you actually need to solve an CR question. If you want to see that in action, watch any of the GMATNinja 's CR videos on YouTube.
GMAT/EA is a pattern matching game, and if I can identify the patterns beforehand and know the strategy to use, it will be much easier for me to attack the question.
Let's take correlation vs. causation questions for example. There are many such identifiable questions. If I know the approach/framework, it will make my life easier. For correlation/causal questions, I know that to weaken an argument, alternative options that cause Y (in X --> Y) could work. I also know that if Y causes X, that also weakens it. I also know that if X causes the opposite desired effect of Y, that also weakens my argument. I also know that if there's not enough data or I can't prove Y, that also weakens the argument.
I am so surprised that no one has taken the time to split the different questions into different question types (correlation/causation, sampling vs. generalization, statistics, analogy, etc...) and shown how to solve them using similar approaches. By doing so, it makes it MUCH easier to learn the topics.
I've read Manhattan and I've tried TTP. Unfortunately I don't see any OG questions with real breakdowns by such frameworks that make our lives easier.
Why is that if I'm doing, let's say, an "averages" question, I can find a multitude of "average" solving math word-problems, but I can't find a database of correlation/causation questions and their answers using the same approach for the same type of question? It boggles my mind!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.