Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 12:52 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 12:52

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3726
Own Kudos [?]: 16844 [19]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11181
Own Kudos [?]: 31966 [4]
Given Kudos: 291
Send PM
Senior PS Moderator
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 2873
Own Kudos [?]: 5206 [0]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11 Aug 2016
Posts: 335
Own Kudos [?]: 351 [1]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
Re: For any purchase of less than $1000, a person doesnt need to pay any [#permalink]
1
Kudos
EgmatQuantExpert wrote:
For any purchase of less than $1000, a person doesn’t need to pay any tax. However, if the purchase value is between $1000 and $2000 included, then the tax is 5% of the excess value over $1000. Also, if the purchase value is more than $2000, then one needs to pay an additional tax of 10% on the excess value over $2000. Which of the following can be the possible purchase value, such that the total tax paid is not more than 4% of the total purchase value?

    A. 2499
    B. 2599
    C. 2699
    D. 2799
    E. 2801


Since all the answer choices are between 2000 and 3000. let us assume that the value would be $(2000+x)
Now calculating the tax.
5% of 1000 + 10% of x. Now this tax should be less than 4% of the whole amount !
= 50 +0.1x < 4% of (2000+x)
= 50 +0.1x < 80 + 0.04x
=0.06x < 30
or x<500

Hence, Answer Choice A is the answer!
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3726
Own Kudos [?]: 16844 [0]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
Re: For any purchase of less than $1000, a person doesnt need to pay any [#permalink]
Expert Reply

Solution


Given:
    • We are given three cases,
      o Case 1: If the purchase value < $1000, then no need to pay tax
      o Case 2: If the purchase value is between $1000 and $2000, then the tax = 5% of the excess value over $1000
      o Case 3: If the purchase value > $2000, then the tax = 5% of ($2000 – $1000) + 10% of the excess value over $2000.

To find:
    • Possible purchase value, such that the total tax paid ≤ 4% of the total purchase value

Approach and Working:
    • So, if we observe, all the options given are greater than $2000
    • Thus, we can directly consider Case-2, where the purchase value is greater than $2000
    • Now, let us assume that the purchase value = $x, such that x > $2000
    • So, the total tax paid = 5% of $1000 + 10% of ($x – $2000)
    • This value should be less than or equal to 4% of x,
      o 5% of $1000 + 10% of ($x – $2000) ≤ 4% of x
      o \($50 + \frac{10x}{100} - $200 ≤ \frac{4x}{100}\)
      o Implies, \(\frac{6x}{100} ≤ $150\)
      o Thus, x ≤ $2500

Therefore, the purchase value must be less than or equal to $2500

Hence, the correct answer is option A.

Answer: A

Current Student
Joined: 17 May 2019
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 170
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: For any purchase of less than $1000, a person doesnt need to pay any [#permalink]
Hi chetan2u

I used the same approach followed by you. However, I was wondering whether this question can be a little clearer because my first thought was that the 5% is applied on the entire amount that is in excess of $1000. For instance 5% of 1499 (if we plug-in answer option A). On top of this you have the "additional" tax for whatever is in excess of $2000.

Could you please share your thoughts on this reading?

chetan2u wrote:
EgmatQuantExpert wrote:
e-GMAT Question of the Week #12


For any purchase of less than $1000, a person doesn’t need to pay any tax. However, if the purchase value is between $1000 and $2000 included, then the tax is 5% of the excess value over $1000. Also, if the purchase value is more than $2000, then one needs to pay an additional tax of 10% on the excess value over $2000. Which of the following can be the possible purchase value, such that the total tax paid is not more than 4% of the total purchase value?

    A. 2499
    B. 2599
    C. 2699
    D. 2799
    E. 2801




Hi..

The question asks for the value and surely ONLY one value should fit in. It has to be the lowest given.
A
Say B is possible, then A<B so A will also be possible and we will have two answers.
So No calculations required and you can press A


Otherwise, if you were to find SAY " max possible integer amount such that the % remains below 4%"

0-1000....Nil
1001-2000...5%
Above 2000....10%
4%of X=5% of 1000 + 10% of (x-2000)
0.04x=50+(0.1x-200)......0.04x=50+0.1x-200.....0.1x-0.04x=150
0.06x=150......6x=15000.....X=2500
So 2499 will be just below 4%

A
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32688
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: For any purchase of less than $1000, a person doesnt need to pay any [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: For any purchase of less than $1000, a person doesnt need to pay any [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92948 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne