Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In Episode 4 of our GMAT Ninja CR series, we tackle the most intimidating CR question type: Boldface & "Legalese" questions. If you've ever stared at an answer choice that reads, "The first is a consideration introduced to counter a position that...
Most GMAT test-takers are intimidated by the hardest GMAT Verbal questions. In this session, Target Test Prep GMAT instructor Erika Tyler-John, a 100th percentile GMAT scorer, will show you how top scorers break down challenging Verbal questions..
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(01:33)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 2
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
An Excellent Question:
According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly, largely because of the burning of fossil fuels, that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century.
(A) that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison
(B) should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison
(C) should the present rate of buildup be continued, the global concentration of this poison
(D) the global concentration of this poison, were the present rate of buildup continue,
(E) that the global concentration of this poison, if the present rate of buildup did continue,
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I'll go with (E) on this one. The phrase "if the present rate of buildup did continue" serves to modify 'concentration of this poison'. Removing the second phrase, will make the original sentence:
According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly, largely because of the burning of fossil fuels, that the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century
I did not find 'did' offending. In hypothetical situations, it is common to use a past tense. E.g. "If I were rich, I would ..."
I'll go with (E) on this one. The phrase "if the present rate of buildup did continue" serves to modify 'concentration of this poison'. Removing the second phrase, will make the original sentence:
According to some experts, carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere so rapidly, largely because of the burning of fossil fuels, that the global concentration of this poison will double by the end of the next century
I did not find 'did' offending. In hypothetical situations, it is common to use a past tense. E.g. "If I were rich, I would ..."
Show more
IMO E would have been correct if it were "if the present rate of buildup does continue" or better still "if the present rate of buildup continues"
you can never jump two tenses (past to future) in conditionals
(A) that should the present rate of buildup continue, the global concentration of this poison should...will... is idiomatic
(E) that the global concentration of this poison, if the present rate of buildup did continue, did makes this sentence wrong (if....were...to continue is correct)
When I was attempting this question, I picked (E). I was racing against time and as soon as I saw "should", I eliminated it thinking that we need an Independent clause (Not any dependent Clause or sth else). I did not bother to read the whole sentence.
While revising, I observed that portion after "should" is an Independent Clause. It is an Subject-Verb Inversion. This question befooled me successfully .
IMO E would have been correct if it were "if the present rate of buildup does continue" or better still "if the present rate of buildup continues"
you can never jump two tenses (past to future) in conditionals
Show more
What is the "tense" for "would"? Isnt it future tense, no? Or is it only used to describe "hypothetical situations"? But every verb/participle should have a tense, right? So wouldnt "would" be future tense?
If i were [past tense] you, I would [future tense???] take the job offer?
IMO E would have been correct if it were "if the present rate of buildup does continue" or better still "if the present rate of buildup continues"
you can never jump two tenses (past to future) in conditionals
What is the "tense" for "would"? Isnt it future tense, no? Or is it only used to describe "hypothetical situations"? But every verb/participle should have a tense, right? So wouldnt "would" be future tense?
If i were [past tense] you, I would [future tense???] take the job offer?
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.