do test makers expect us to argue like kids?
question 4 asks us to undermine the last sentence, which focuses on "disregard" supposedly advocated by john locke and his fellows.
Quote:
The labor theory of value systematically disregards the productive contribution of capital goods
but the OA indicates that the fact is not those guys disregarded the contribution of capital goods, but there was no such contribution at all.
it's just like two kids arguing: one said "you are wrong" and another fought back "no, you are wrong"
that's ridiculous for a gmat question.
the only thing justifying this question, "if true" at this point, is funny too.
Quote:
Which of the following statements, if true, would most effectively counter the author's criticism of Locke at the end of the passage?
(C) During Locke's lifetime, capital goods did not make a significant productive contribution to the economy.
because such claim has never been true.
capital investment, labor force, intellectual property, and land tenure are essential factors making contribution to the economy, even in locke's era.
the fact that john locke and his fellows solely praised labor force can only tell us that they rejected other factors arbitrarily.