Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 22:05 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 22:05

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 143
Own Kudos [?]: 6427 [5]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11-23-2015
GPA: 3.6
WE:Science (Other)
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2015
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 45 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2015
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2018
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [0]
Given Kudos: 139
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Student: After the disappointingly uncompetitive volleyball matches of [#permalink]
Premise: Teacher resolved that the four star players from the winning team would no longer be able to play together.
Conclusion: The teacher split us up into four teams today, but my team does not have a star player on it.
Assumption: Some reason why though divided into 4 teams still a team did not get a star player.

A - Out of focus
B - Out of focus
C - Out of focus
D - Out of focus
E - Yes.
If this is true, explains why a team did not get a star player.
If this is false, premise fails.
So, correct choice is E.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V32
GPA: 4
WE:Sales (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Student: After the disappointingly uncompetitive volleyball matches of [#permalink]
apurva908 wrote:
Can some help, why D is wrong.


(D) To be satisfyingly competitive, gym class volleyball must feature more than four teams. --> This cannot be the assumption. If anything this weakens the conclusion. The number of teams must be less than or equal to 4 since there are 4 star players. Only then the conclusion holds. Secondly, To be satisfyingly competitive is outside information and is not a must be true condition.

Hope this helps.
Tutor
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 1315
Own Kudos [?]: 3136 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Send PM
Re: Student: After the disappointingly uncompetitive volleyball matches of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
WillGetIt wrote:
Student: After the disappointingly uncompetitive volleyball matches of yesterday's gym class, our teacher resolved that the four star players from the winning team would no longer be able to play together. This resolution has clearly not been followed: the teacher split us up into four teams today, but my team does not have a star player on it.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which the student's argument relies?


(A) For a team game to be fair, skill must be evenly distributed among the teams.

(B) A teacher who breaks his or her promises has failed to live up to his or her professional responsibilities.

(C) Volleyball stars are born, not made.

(D) To be satisfyingly competitive, gym class volleyball must feature more than four teams.

(E) All of yesterday's star players are in gym class again today.


Premise: After the class was split into four teams today, our team lacked a star player.
Conclusion: Our teacher broke her promise that yesterday's four star players would no longer be allowed to play together on team.

The conclusion is valid only if two or more of yesterday's star players are playing together on one of today's teams.

Apply the NEGATION TEST.
When the correct answer choice is negated, the conclusion will be invalidated.

E, negated:
Not all of yesterday's star players are in gym class today.
Here, at most three of yesterday's star players are in class today, with the result that the other three teams could each have exactly one star player (or even NO star players).
Thus, the argument cannot conclude that two or more star players are playing together on a team today and that the teacher broke her promise.
Since the negation of E invalidates the conclusion, E is an ASSUMPTION: a statement that MUST BE TRUE for the conclusion to hold.

The other options, negated:
(A) Skill does not need to be evenly distributed among the teams.
(B) A teacher who breaks his or her promises may still be living up to his or her professional responsibilities.
(C) Volleyball stars are made, not born.
(D) Gym class volleyball does not need to feature more than four teams.

None of these negations has any bearing on whether two or more players are playing together on a team today.

User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17224
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Student: After the disappointingly uncompetitive volleyball matches of [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Student: After the disappointingly uncompetitive volleyball matches of [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne