Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 19:24 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 19:24

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619249 [3]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Verbal Chat Moderator
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Posts: 2001
Own Kudos [?]: 1614 [0]
Given Kudos: 1680
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2021
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 15 [0]
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: NUS '25 (A)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V32
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.48
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: The City Opera Company does not sell tickets to individual performance [#permalink]
Quick doubt - Option A looks like a classic trap and is not completely inferrable on the basis of increase in occupany + decrease in new pass sales. What if the retained pass holders remained the same or even decreased, but the subset of pass holders simply started showing up more frequently to the opera?

I interpreted option E as "net-net" interest increased (either from more retention or more retained folks actually showing up) enough to offset the decrease of new pass sales such that overall interest grew.

What's wrong with this approach and why is A inferrable?
Tutor
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 826
Own Kudos [?]: 1419 [2]
Given Kudos: 75
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Send PM
Re: The City Opera Company does not sell tickets to individual performance [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
 
Sk1003 wrote:
Quick doubt - Option A looks like a classic trap and is not completely inferrable on the basis of increase in occupany + decrease in new pass sales. What if the retained pass holders remained the same or even decreased, but the subset of pass holders simply started showing up more frequently to the opera?

I interpreted option E as "net-net" interest increased (either from more retention or more retained folks actually showing up) enough to offset the decrease of new pass sales such that overall interest grew.

What's wrong with this approach and why is A inferrable?

­(E) is about interest in opera in general, not just interest in the City Opera's performances.

At the same time, as you and someone else have pointed out, (A) is not inferable.

This question has no correct answer.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2024
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Send PM
Re: The City Opera Company does not sell tickets to individual performance [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Option E is also supported but is a broader inference about overall interest, which, while likely true given the data, is not as directly connected to the specifics of ticket sales and retention.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 46 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: The City Opera Company does not sell tickets to individual performance [#permalink]
MartyMurray wrote:
Sk1003 wrote:
Quick doubt - Option A looks like a classic trap and is not completely inferrable on the basis of increase in occupany + decrease in new pass sales. What if the retained pass holders remained the same or even decreased, but the subset of pass holders simply started showing up more frequently to the opera?

I interpreted option E as "net-net" interest increased (either from more retention or more retained folks actually showing up) enough to offset the decrease of new pass sales such that overall interest grew.

What's wrong with this approach and why is A inferrable?

­(E) is about interest in opera in general, not just interest in the City Opera's performances.

At the same time, as you and someone else have pointed out, (A) is not inferable.

This question has no correct answer.

­Aaah, you're right. I did not notice my mind filling in the blanks while reading option E there. It's too generalised.

Then I agree, this question has no right answer. Wonder what's the source on this, is it an official question..

Thanks for clarifying this. Although I was a bit taken aback on seeing 80% folks answering "correctly" as per the stats on this question. 

Anyway, I hope the GMAT doesn't throw such things our way
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2019
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The City Opera Company does not sell tickets to individual performance [#permalink]
I NEED TO UNDERSTAND, WHY WE CHOSE ANSWER A and NOT E
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The City Opera Company does not sell tickets to individual performance [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne