Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 15:33 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 15:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
akela
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Last visit: 23 May 2023
Posts: 1,230
Own Kudos:
5,220
 [6]
Given Kudos: 128
Products:
Posts: 1,230
Kudos: 5,220
 [6]
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ApocalyptoRishi
Joined: 24 Jul 2018
Last visit: 03 May 2019
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
taniad
Joined: 17 Mar 2018
Last visit: 11 Feb 2021
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Products:
Posts: 53
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
madhankumar666
Joined: 10 Jan 2018
Last visit: 04 May 2019
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Posts: 15
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ApocalyptoRishi
Akela
The giant Chicxulub crater in Mexico provides indisputable evidence that a huge asteroid, about six miles across, struck Earth around the time many of the last dinosaur species were becoming extinct. But this catastrophe was probably not responsible for most of these extinctions. Any major asteroid strike kills many organisms in or near the region of the impact, but there is little evidence that such a strike could have a worldwide effect. Indeed, some craters even larger than the Chicxulub crater were made during times in Earth’s history when there were no known extinctions.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?


(A) The vast majority of dinosaur species are known to have gone extinct well before the time of the asteroid impact that produced the Chicxulub crater.-Out of scope

(B) The size of a crater caused by an asteroid striking Earth generally depends on both the size of that asteroid and the force of its impact.-completely out of scope

(C) Fossils have been discovered of a number of dinosaurs that clearly died as a result of the asteroid impact that produced the Chicxulub crater.

(D) There is no evidence that any other asteroid of equal size struck Earth at the same time as the asteroid that produced the Chicxulub crater.-out of scope

(E) During the period immediately before the asteroid that produced the Chicxulub crater struck, most of the world’s dinosaurs lived in or near the region of the asteroid’s impending impact.


LSAT


Why is the answer E? It ratifies the author's argument that an asteroid impact cannot have a worldwide effect.
Because of this ambiguity of thought, I chose C.
The argument says that the asteroid was not the cause of extinction of dinosaurs
so, the answer choice should says there is a situation when asteroid may be the cause for extinction.
Choices A,B and D are completely out of scope.Choice A doesnot say anything about the asteroid and its effect on dinosaurs,Choice B doesn't say anything about dinosaur, Choice D does not say anything this asteroid, it open to debate that something else might have caused the extinction( to some extent it strengthen)
CHOICE C:provides evidence number of dinosaurs killed by asteroid. But it doesn't says that all dinosaurs have been killed by the asteroid.
whereas CHOICE E: Shows a scenario when asteroid effects where localised and yet it caused the extinction of dinosaurs.

SO, E undermines the conclusion.
Hence E is the correct answer
User avatar
MrudulaL
Joined: 17 Apr 2022
Last visit: 04 May 2023
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 475
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja can you pls explain why option C is incorrect
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 2,741
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 764
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,741
Kudos: 2,008
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The giant Chicxulub crater in Mexico provides indisputable evidence that a huge asteroid, about six miles across, struck Earth around the time many of the last dinosaur species were becoming extinct. But this catastrophe was probably not responsible for most of these extinctions. Any major asteroid strike kills many organisms in or near the region of the impact, but there is little evidence that such a strike could have a worldwide effect. Indeed, some craters even larger than the Chicxulub crater were made during times in Earth’s history when there were no known extinctions.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument?

(A) The vast majority of dinosaur species are known to have gone extinct well before the time of the asteroid impact that produced the Chicxulub crater. - WRONG. Irrelevant. No reason to passage further if this option is considered.

(B) The size of a crater caused by an asteroid striking Earth generally depends on both the size of that asteroid and the force of its impact. - WRONG. Then what!! Further assumption/s are required.

(C) Fossils have been discovered of a number of dinosaurs that clearly died as a result of the asteroid impact that produced the Chicxulub crater. - WRONG. No problem as such with this one except the fact that we don't know the scale of 'a number of dinosaurs'. Was that number significantly high during that time? OR Was it small? Choice goes in either direction.

(D) There is no evidence that any other asteroid of equal size struck Earth at the same time as the asteroid that produced the Chicxulub crater. - WRONG. Sort of a strengthener.

(E) During the period immediately before the asteroid that produced the Chicxulub crater struck, most of the world’s dinosaurs lived in or near the region of the asteroid’s impending impact. - CORRECT. Weakener.

Another weakener could have been when craters even larger than the Chicxulub crater were made during times in Earth’s history when there were no known extinctions, possibly there were no dinosaurs living on Earth or probably life was not there.

Answer E.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 7,153
Own Kudos:
66,092
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,870
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,153
Kudos: 66,092
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MrudulaL
GMATNinja can you pls explain why option C is incorrect
The author concludes that the asteroid "was probably not responsible for most [dinosaur] extinctions" at the time of its impact.

He/she reaches this conclusion by saying that "there is little evidence that such a strike could have a worldwide effect" -- so, even if the asteroid killed off a bunch of dinosaurs in the immediate area of the impact, how can we say that it was responsible for dinos dying in other areas of the globe?

The question asks us to weaken the argument. Here's (C):
Quote:
(C) Fossils have been discovered of a number of dinosaurs that clearly died as a result of the asteroid impact that produced the Chicxulub crater.
The author thinks it's totally reasonable that the asteroid killed off dinosaurs near the impact site. He/she just doesn't think that we can blame the asteroid for "most" of the dino deaths, because there's no evidence that the asteroid would kill off dinos far away from the impact.

(C) tells us that "a number of dinosaurs that clearly died as a result of the asteroid impact" -- but it doesn't tell us where these dinosaurs are. If they were close to the impact area, then (C) would not impact the author's argument at all. If they were really far away, then (C) would provide a nice counterpoint to the argument. But again, we just don't know where the fossils were found.

Because (C) doesn't tell us the location of the fossils, it doesn't weaken the argument.

(C) is out.

Here's (E):
Quote:
(E) During the period immediately before the asteroid that produced the Chicxulub crater struck, most of the world’s dinosaurs lived in or near the region of the asteroid’s impending impact.
Bingo. The author doesn't think we can say that "most" of the dinosaurs died because of the asteroid. But what if most of the dinos lived really close to the impact zone? That would kill the author's reasoning.

(D) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 17,991
Own Kudos:
Posts: 17,991
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts