Last visit was: 17 May 2024, 20:45 It is currently 17 May 2024, 20:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 140
Own Kudos [?]: 2430 [37]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4382
Own Kudos [?]: 30907 [5]
Given Kudos: 639
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 343 [5]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 92
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
1
Kudos
abhi758 wrote:
The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit package of the state and local workers during their employment, but it does allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governor’s veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

(A) The governor wants to reduce the benefit of the package
(B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit package
(C) The legislature supports the new pension program
(D) The governor will probably veto the new pension program
(E) The State Constitution permits the governor to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment

Kindly justify the option you choose.. OA will be posted shortly..


I think it should be C.
The paragraph states that the governor's veto power remains as the ONLY possible obstacle, hence it assumes that the legislature supports the new pension program.
I think it's not D because the statement says that the governor's veto power remains as the only POSSIBLE obstacle. It doesn't assume that the governor probably will.

What's the OA please?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
I would go with C. "Possible obstacle" is the key phrase here. The author is not implying that the program will be vetoed. All he is saying is that the program "could" be vetoed by the governor. He is assuming that everything else is in favor of the program. That legislature is in favor of the program. If this were not the case then, the author would not say "ONLY possible obstacle".
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 633
Own Kudos [?]: 3227 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
it is C

state prohibits the law-makers from reducing the benefit package.
state allows improvment of benefit package.
governer's veto power (prohibiting power) is the only obtsacle to new pension enhancement program (governer is the only one prohibiting the new pension enhancement program)...which means Legislature is supporting the new pension enhancement program (option C).

E is irrelevant.

The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit package of the state and local workers during their employment, but it does allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governor’s veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

(A) The governor wants to reduce the benefit of the package
(B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit package
(C) The legislature supports the new pension program
(D) The governor will probably veto the new pension program
(E) The State Constitution permits the governor to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
1
Kudos
My answer is C.

The way I got there was using one of my lessons learned from: kaplan-cr-pension-program-34270.html#p235493.

Lesson 1: An extreme conclusion requires an extreme premise or assumption. For example, if the conclusion claims something to be the best, then all others must be inferior.

The conclusion is stating the veto power is the ONLY way the program can be rejected. Therefore, the appropriate assumption is that ALL OTHER ways to reject the program are not applicable.

Looks like the OA is C: kaplan-cr-pension-program-34270.html#p235493
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 324
Own Kudos [?]: 2478 [0]
Given Kudos: 185
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
Answer (C) is the correct choice. Legislature support means it is not the obstacle for the pension program. That leaves governor as probable obstacle for the pension program.
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 588
Own Kudos [?]: 1530 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
Expert Reply
abhi758 wrote:
The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit package of the state and local workers during their employment, but it does allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governor’s veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

(A) The governor wants to reduce the benefit of the package
(B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit package
(C) The legislature supports the new pension program
(D) The governor will probably veto the new pension program
(E) The State Constitution permits the governor to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment

Kindly justify the option you choose.. OA will be posted shortly..


When an assumption is needed there is something that doesn't logically follow from the argument. But to make the argument valid something has to be considered true or in other words we make an assumption

The clue to answering this question is in the words "remains as the only possible obstacle". It is something that doesn't follow from the argument but it has to be consistent with the argument. So you include the assumption which in this case is given by choice C. Only when the author assumes that the legislature supports the program can he say that the only possible obstacle to the program is the governor's veto power.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2012
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Said (D)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE:Sales (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
Quote:
The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit package of the state and local workers during their employment, but it does allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governor’s veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

(A) The governor wants to reduce the benefit of the package
Wrong Out of scope since we talk about an improvement of the benefits.
(B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit package
Wrong The author assumes that the package is part of the benefit package. Otherwise the first sentence would make no sense.
(C) The legislature supports the new pension program
Correct If the legislature would not support the programm it would the other obstacle besides the possible veto of the governor. The latter would thus not be the ONLY obstacle.
(D) The governor will probably veto the new pension program
Wrong There has to be the possibility that the govenor vetos the upgrade. "Possible" inferes a liklehood which is irellevant. Further there could be other obstacles, like the rest of the legislature.
(E) The State Constitution permits the governor to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment
Wrong Out of scope since we are talking about an enhancement and not an reduction of benefits.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 70
Own Kudos [?]: 286 [1]
Given Kudos: 137
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q41 V31
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I couldn't get the right answer in the first time. But after knowing that OA is C, it makes sense.

As per the argument,the SC bans L from 'reducing' some benefits package. But improvements (or enhancements) are allowed.
We have 2 powerful bodies in the argument.
1. Legislature
2. Governed
Since, argument mentions that Governor is the only bad guy, implies Legislature favors the 'improvement' or enhancement. This piece was however not stated and must be the assumption.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you answer choice C!

+Kudos, if this helped!! :)
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Ans is c. If legislature is not supporting , then governor is not the only one obstacle.
User avatar
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 656 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
"C" says the legislature supports the new pension program which leaves us with only one option that the Governor's veto power is the only obstacle.If we negate this that the legislature does not support then the negated answer choice goes against the conclusion.In "B" even if its not part of the benefit package still the governor's veto power can be an obstacle.Moreover "b" is not a necessary assumption.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 52
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
(C) The legislature supports the new pension program
The governor's veto is the ONLY obstacle as per the argument, so legislature obviously supports it.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 108
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 129
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
I go with C

Conclusion is only governor can stop the pension plan.
Only c states why governor has to stop it .. Since the legislation is planing to implement, governor's veto power is needed to stop that plan.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93334
Own Kudos [?]: 624552 [0]
Given Kudos: 81898
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Rajeet123 wrote:
what is the answer?


____________________________
The OA is C.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Posts: 201
Own Kudos [?]: 50 [0]
Given Kudos: 368
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Send PM
The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
abhi758 wrote:
The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit package of the state and local workers during their employment, but it does allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governor’s veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?


(A) The governor wants to reduce the benefit of the package

(B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit package

(C) The legislature supports the new pension program

(D) The governor will probably veto the new pension program

(E) The State Constitution permits the governor to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment


Can't option B be right? What if the pension program is part of the benefit package. And we know that legislature can very well do the improvements to the package. As part of improvement, can't the legislature introduce a new pensions scheme for recently hired public school teachers?

Experts please help.
Bunuel
GMATNinja
VeritasKarishma
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2021
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 64
Location: India
Send PM
The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
swanidhi wrote:
I couldn't get the right answer in the first time. But after knowing that OA is C, it makes sense.

As per the argument,the SC bans L from 'reducing' some benefits package. But improvements (or enhancements) are allowed.
We have 2 powerful bodies in the argument.
1. Legislature
2. Governed
Since, argument mentions that Governor is the only bad guy, implies Legislature favors the 'improvement' or enhancement. This piece was however not stated and must be the assumption.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you answer choice C!

+Kudos, if this helped!! :)



You're the only one with accurate reasoning.
"Enhancement" is the key word.

Posted from my mobile device
ISB & IIM Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Posts: 287
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [0]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
Can anyone please explain me why option E is wrong?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17311
Own Kudos [?]: 851 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing the benefit [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6929 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts