GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Sep 2018, 17:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Mar 2009
Posts: 16
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2010, 02:13
1
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

49% (01:51) correct 51% (01:28) wrong based on 153 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.
(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.
(C) Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant.
(D) The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2.
(E) The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years.

QA 8
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 197
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 05 Apr 2010, 00:00
tough one. between B and C I pick B.
It is difficult one for an explanation.

Originally posted by Indien on 04 Apr 2010, 03:07.
Last edited by Indien on 05 Apr 2010, 00:00, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 160
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2010, 07:07
1
clearly B

Argument says: % of serious accidents rose 20% but child fatality rose only 10%
so child fatality must have been reduced by safety gear

But what if the proportion of accidents invloving child fatalities itself decreased by lets say 90%,then the proportioante rise in death of children under 4 should have been somewhere around 2% which is far less than 10%.

Here the stimulus comes in to say that No,THE PRPORTION REMAINED SAME and clarifies that no such decrease took place and seals the argument.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1227
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2010, 20:34
will appreciate if someone can provide a more detailed explanation on this
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Location: Ukraine
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2010, 14:06
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.


I'm newbie in CR.
Maybe I undeerstood wrong all conception of the Strengthen questions.
I thought the answer is A.
We need to prove cause, and the cause here is 'increase of child fatalities'.
And the effect is "doubling children seates by children aged 4 and under".
so, answer A says "yes, increase of child fatalities was because seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5"
Can somebody explaine where my mistake is, please?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 178
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2010, 17:46
B is closer. We can rule out A since we are only looking at kids <= 4yrs of age and data pertaining to that. the key here in the question is that we have to focus on accident numbers of kids 4 yr and under....hope this helps
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 821
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2010, 01:09
IMO B.

The conclusion - It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred.

Best supporting premise: fatalities that otherwise would have occurred.

HAS PREVENTED is the catch here. If the safety seats has preveneted the fatalities for the 8 yrs then the use of safety seats is justified. Choice B is indicating this.

(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.

arghya05 wrote:
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.
(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.
(C) Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant.
(D) The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2.
(E) The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years.

QA 8

_________________

Want to improve your CR: http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1227
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2010, 13:22
can someone provide a detailed explanation on how (B) strengthens the argument?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 72
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2010, 08:06
When I encounter question that is too time consuming to understand, I just scan the keyword in each answer choice for POE:
(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.-Children over 5 is out of scope
(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.-proportion is usually related to %-keep this one
(C) Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant.- again out of scope
(D) The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2.-not pertaining to the subject matter
(E) The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years.- not pertaining to subject matter

Going back to B, I still cant understand how they are related, but since every other choice is out of scope, I would keep B , finger crossed of course
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2010
Posts: 4
Re: good cr please solve  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2010, 11:38
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.
(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.
(C) Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant.
(D) The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2.
(E) The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years.


Conclusion:The increase in the use of automobile safety has prevented child fatalities
Evidence :
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years.
The number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years
The total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.

Note ,how suttle the difference is ,the conclusion talks of preventing child fatalities and evidence talks of serious automobile accidents which can include children ,teenagers ,etc all age groups ,But if its given liek in (B)that the proportion of serious fatalities in children amongst this vast group remained same ,it definitedly strengthens the conclusion ,


For example let in 1900 ,the no of child accident =100,in 1908 it shall be 110 (10%more)

let total no of serious accidents in 1900=1000 ,in 1908 it shall be 1200 (20%more)but we know that child fatalities are fixed at 10% proportion ,so compared to other age group fatalities ,they have decreased if we are to assume that their proportion is fixed over the last 10 years ,a period during which serious accidents over other age groups rose over 20%.


I hope its now clear to all ,


Humble Regards ,


Amlan Dutta
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Posts: 404
Location: Europe
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2010, 11:53
I pick B.

I'm currently working on CR with the PowerScore bible, so I'll apply their techniques:

First find the conclusion (if any):
Quote:
It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred


Now we need to find answers that strengthen this conclusion. Well, except B they do not add any value to the conclusion, as they mostly bring in irrelevant information.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2010
Posts: 185
Location: Boston
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2010, 20:50
arghya05 wrote:
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.
(B) The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.
(C) Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant.
(D) The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2.
(E) The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years.

QA 8


The first thing I thought when I read the bolded part of the argument was, "The total number of serious automobile accidents does not specify the age of the people in the cars - what if that 20% increase was made up entirely of adults?" If that were true, then the argument that the increase in child fatalities is irrelevant would be false. So, if you want to strengthen the claim, look for a piece of information stating that the number of children in these accidents has increased as well. Answer (B) states exactly that - since the proportion of accidents involving children has remained constant, then any increase in ALL accidents means there's an increase in the RELEVANT accidents we care about. (B) is the answer.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 23
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.59
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2010, 01:38
It is B:

Assuming that the proportion of accidents involving children has remained constant, while the number of the serious accidents have increased clearly supports the conclusion that the use of safety seats decreased the fatality.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 383
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: good cr please slove  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2010, 11:00
B is the only one tht strengthens the argument
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TheLaptopSkinVault
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/LaptopSkinVault

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 53
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2016, 02:59
As per argument
8 yrs before no.of fatal accidents 100
Let say Children died is 10 which is 10% of total

In past 8yrs fatal accidents rose by 20% = 120
Children died increased by 10%, which is 11 in number which is 9% of 120.

Option B
The proportion of children involving in accidents is constant.
It means before 8yrs, it was 10% involvement, if it is constant, 10% of 120 is 12 which is more than 10% of deaths that mentioned in argument.

So this answer is Wrong.

====
Option C

More frequent trips means more chance of children involving in accidents, but still 10% fatality increase only due to child safety seat.

It could be wrong if they say children spent longer time in cars during the trip, and got involved in more % of accidents.

Please let me where I am going wrong.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2931
Premium Member
Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2018, 03:08
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

Re: The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and &nbs [#permalink] 03 Sep 2018, 03:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.