Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:07 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,292
 [29]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
 [29]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
26
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,292
 [5]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
horrorslive
Joined: 28 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 91
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
harsha51
Joined: 12 Mar 2023
Last visit: 25 Apr 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
8
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
Posts: 1
Kudos: 8
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
horrorslive
in the 2nd question how did you get 345%?

Yet investors have become jittery recently, fearing that widget sales will decline—as gizmo sales did last year—and knocked Next Widget’s stock price down 33% from its peak of $113.17 in late 2011.

From this line we can infer that recently on the day of the first analyst’s report Next Widget’s stock price decreased by 33% from $113.17. This gives us Next Widget’s stock price to be $75.82.

Also from second analyst's report we can get stock price at its initial public offering to be $21.97 (from this line $113.17 per share on December 19, 2011—a 415% increase over its initial public offering share price in 2002)

So $75.82 is approximately 345% of $21.97
User avatar
Deepa444
Joined: 12 Feb 2024
Last visit: 12 Nov 2024
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 28
Kudos: 9
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994 can u post the official solution for the first 3 sub questions?­
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,292
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Deepa444
Sajjad1994 can u post the official solution for the first 3 sub questions?­
­
Official Explanation

­
1. For each of the following statements, select Inferable if the statement is reasonably inferable from the information provided. Otherwise, select Not inferable.

Explanation

Step 1: Begin with the big picture.


This prompt presents two sources of information, reports by two analysts about the company Next Widget. The first analyst believes the company’s stock is worth buying, whereas the second one disagrees. The first analyst supports his opinion by saying that Next Widget is a very successful company, has many popular products, and should increase its revenues due to its expansion in South America. The analyst also expects that the widget industry in general stands to gain from softness in the gizmo industry. Note also the figures: the share price is down in 2012, having reached its high late in 2011. (Don’t worry about the exact numbers at this stage; just take note that they’re there, and you can come back to them if you need to when you look at the questions.) The second analyst acknowledges that Next Widget has been very successful to date, but sees reason for concern. In support of her argument, she cites the declining rate of increase in the company’s revenues in 2010 and 2011 and increased domestic competition from another company. She is also not enthusiastic about the South American expansion, forecasting a loss at first for the company. This analyst quotes more figures than the first one. In addition to the declining rate of revenue increase, she also mentions the percent increase in the share price since the IPO and quotes the same high price as the one the first analyst mentions. Make a mental note and move on to the first question.

Step 2: Size up the question.

This is a yes/no question asking you to determine whether you can infer certain statements based on the two analyst reports. The statements appear to be self-contained to one tab per statement: that is, in this case you need to look only in the first tab for statements referring to the first analyst, and only in the second tab for statements referring to the second analyst.

Step 3: Answer the question:

Answer for Statement 1: Does the first analyst say anything about profits in South America? No, he expects a boost in revenues, but that’s about it. Therefore, you cannot infer that he expects Next Widget to make a profit in South America in the coming year.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 2: The second analyst mentions Widgitainers as an up-and-coming company that should give Next Widget increased competition in the future. However, the analyst makes no mention of Widgitainers’ stock.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 3: The second analyst says that Next Widget’s revenue increases of $210 million in 2010 and $193 million in 2011 were the smallest of the past decade, and that this trend will likely continue in 2012. What trend is this? If these two figures were the smallest in a decade, then the revenue increase in 2009 must have been greater than (or possibly equal to) the revenue increase in 2010.

Furthermore, the revenue increase in 2011 is smaller than that in 2010, so the trend the analyst mentions is that of a declining rate of revenue increase at least for the years 2009–2011. She expects this trend to continue, so she believes Next Widget will either not increase its revenues in 2012, or it will increase them by less than (or at least no more than) the 2011 figure: $193 million.

The correct answer is “Inferable.”­
User avatar
manavrajj
Joined: 01 Oct 2024
Last visit: 04 Sep 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
hey is it advisable to use the calculator for the second question?
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manavrajj
Sajjad1994
hey is it advisable to use the calculator for the second question?
You can use calculator in any DI question as far as it is productive and time efficient.
User avatar
OZLEMOZTURK526
Joined: 31 Mar 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 7
Products:
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The third statement says that the analyst doesn't expect the profits to go up by more than 193 million, not the revenues. How did the official solution arrive at a conclusion about profits based on a statement about revenues?
Sajjad1994

Deepa444
Sajjad1994 can u post the official solution for the first 3 sub questions?­
­
Official Explanation

­
1. For each of the following statements, select Inferable if the statement is reasonably inferable from the information provided. Otherwise, select Not inferable.

Explanation

Step 1: Begin with the big picture.


This prompt presents two sources of information, reports by two analysts about the company Next Widget. The first analyst believes the company’s stock is worth buying, whereas the second one disagrees. The first analyst supports his opinion by saying that Next Widget is a very successful company, has many popular products, and should increase its revenues due to its expansion in South America. The analyst also expects that the widget industry in general stands to gain from softness in the gizmo industry. Note also the figures: the share price is down in 2012, having reached its high late in 2011. (Don’t worry about the exact numbers at this stage; just take note that they’re there, and you can come back to them if you need to when you look at the questions.) The second analyst acknowledges that Next Widget has been very successful to date, but sees reason for concern. In support of her argument, she cites the declining rate of increase in the company’s revenues in 2010 and 2011 and increased domestic competition from another company. She is also not enthusiastic about the South American expansion, forecasting a loss at first for the company. This analyst quotes more figures than the first one. In addition to the declining rate of revenue increase, she also mentions the percent increase in the share price since the IPO and quotes the same high price as the one the first analyst mentions. Make a mental note and move on to the first question.

Step 2: Size up the question.

This is a yes/no question asking you to determine whether you can infer certain statements based on the two analyst reports. The statements appear to be self-contained to one tab per statement: that is, in this case you need to look only in the first tab for statements referring to the first analyst, and only in the second tab for statements referring to the second analyst.

Step 3: Answer the question:

Answer for Statement 1: Does the first analyst say anything about profits in South America? No, he expects a boost in revenues, but that’s about it. Therefore, you cannot infer that he expects Next Widget to make a profit in South America in the coming year.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 2: The second analyst mentions Widgitainers as an up-and-coming company that should give Next Widget increased competition in the future. However, the analyst makes no mention of Widgitainers’ stock.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 3: The second analyst says that Next Widget’s revenue increases of $210 million in 2010 and $193 million in 2011 were the smallest of the past decade, and that this trend will likely continue in 2012. What trend is this? If these two figures were the smallest in a decade, then the revenue increase in 2009 must have been greater than (or possibly equal to) the revenue increase in 2010.

Furthermore, the revenue increase in 2011 is smaller than that in 2010, so the trend the analyst mentions is that of a declining rate of revenue increase at least for the years 2009–2011. She expects this trend to continue, so she believes Next Widget will either not increase its revenues in 2012, or it will increase them by less than (or at least no more than) the 2011 figure: $193 million.

The correct answer is “Inferable.”­
User avatar
Yosemite98
Joined: 28 Jan 2025
Last visit: 25 Jul 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Location: Spain
Concentration: Technology
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q86 V82 DI79
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q86 V82 DI79
Posts: 56
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OZLEMOZTURK526
The third statement says that the analyst doesn't expect the profits to go up by more than 193 million, not the revenues. How did the official solution arrive at a conclusion about profits based on a statement about revenues?
Sajjad1994

Deepa444
Sajjad1994 can u post the official solution for the first 3 sub questions?­
­
Official Explanation

­
1. For each of the following statements, select Inferable if the statement is reasonably inferable from the information provided. Otherwise, select Not inferable.

Explanation

Step 1: Begin with the big picture.


This prompt presents two sources of information, reports by two analysts about the company Next Widget. The first analyst believes the company’s stock is worth buying, whereas the second one disagrees. The first analyst supports his opinion by saying that Next Widget is a very successful company, has many popular products, and should increase its revenues due to its expansion in South America. The analyst also expects that the widget industry in general stands to gain from softness in the gizmo industry. Note also the figures: the share price is down in 2012, having reached its high late in 2011. (Don’t worry about the exact numbers at this stage; just take note that they’re there, and you can come back to them if you need to when you look at the questions.) The second analyst acknowledges that Next Widget has been very successful to date, but sees reason for concern. In support of her argument, she cites the declining rate of increase in the company’s revenues in 2010 and 2011 and increased domestic competition from another company. She is also not enthusiastic about the South American expansion, forecasting a loss at first for the company. This analyst quotes more figures than the first one. In addition to the declining rate of revenue increase, she also mentions the percent increase in the share price since the IPO and quotes the same high price as the one the first analyst mentions. Make a mental note and move on to the first question.

Step 2: Size up the question.

This is a yes/no question asking you to determine whether you can infer certain statements based on the two analyst reports. The statements appear to be self-contained to one tab per statement: that is, in this case you need to look only in the first tab for statements referring to the first analyst, and only in the second tab for statements referring to the second analyst.

Step 3: Answer the question:

Answer for Statement 1: Does the first analyst say anything about profits in South America? No, he expects a boost in revenues, but that’s about it. Therefore, you cannot infer that he expects Next Widget to make a profit in South America in the coming year.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 2: The second analyst mentions Widgitainers as an up-and-coming company that should give Next Widget increased competition in the future. However, the analyst makes no mention of Widgitainers’ stock.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 3: The second analyst says that Next Widget’s revenue increases of $210 million in 2010 and $193 million in 2011 were the smallest of the past decade, and that this trend will likely continue in 2012. What trend is this? If these two figures were the smallest in a decade, then the revenue increase in 2009 must have been greater than (or possibly equal to) the revenue increase in 2010.

Furthermore, the revenue increase in 2011 is smaller than that in 2010, so the trend the analyst mentions is that of a declining rate of revenue increase at least for the years 2009–2011. She expects this trend to continue, so she believes Next Widget will either not increase its revenues in 2012, or it will increase them by less than (or at least no more than) the 2011 figure: $193 million.

The correct answer is “Inferable.”­
I had the same doubt. But it can be inferred as Profits = Revenue - Costs, thus profits will always be less or equal to revenues (depending on the cost value), thus for sure profits will increase by less than $193MM.

Hope it helps!
User avatar
srishti1702
Joined: 17 Apr 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
By that logic, shouldn't statement 1 also be correct then? Since the passage gives information about revenues, so we should be able to infer information related to the profits.
Yosemite98

I had the same doubt. But it can be inferred as Profits = Revenue - Costs, thus profits will always be less or equal to revenues (depending on the cost value), thus for sure profits will increase by less than $193MM.

Hope it helps!
User avatar
Yosemite98
Joined: 28 Jan 2025
Last visit: 25 Jul 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
27
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: Spain
Concentration: Technology
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q86 V82 DI79
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q86 V82 DI79
Posts: 56
Kudos: 27
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
srishti1702
By that logic, shouldn't statement 1 also be correct then? Since the passage gives information about revenues, so we should be able to infer information related to the profits.
Yosemite98

I had the same doubt. But it can be inferred as Profits = Revenue - Costs, thus profits will always be less or equal to revenues (depending on the cost value), thus for sure profits will increase by less than $193MM.

Hope it helps!

No they are different. "to make a profit" means that profit is > 0 or that revenue > costs. We do not know if profit will be positive or negative, we know that profit will be less than revenue but not the sign of it.

I hope it is clear!
User avatar
wArrior902
Joined: 19 Jan 2023
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Posts: 20
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's true that profit will be less than revenue, but it's not true that the increase in profits will always be less than the increase in revenue. Let's take revenues increased by 190 million, and costs decreased by 10 million. Then profits will be increased by 200 million in this case.
Yosemite98
I had the same doubt. But it can be inferred as Profits = Revenue - Costs, thus profits will always be less or equal to revenues (depending on the cost value), thus for sure profits will increase by less than $193MM.

Hope it helps!
User avatar
RiyaJ0032
Joined: 13 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 200
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for statement 1c, can we consider a company's top line as company's profits?

No right

top line refers to sales

C is asking us about profits

while second analyst would hold the belief about company's top line

we cannot infer anything about profits

Can some expert please clarify?

KarishmaB
egmat
@Napolean97287
Sajjad1994

Deepa444
Sajjad1994 can u post the official solution for the first 3 sub questions?­
­
Official Explanation

­
1. For each of the following statements, select Inferable if the statement is reasonably inferable from the information provided. Otherwise, select Not inferable.

Explanation

Step 1: Begin with the big picture.


This prompt presents two sources of information, reports by two analysts about the company Next Widget. The first analyst believes the company’s stock is worth buying, whereas the second one disagrees. The first analyst supports his opinion by saying that Next Widget is a very successful company, has many popular products, and should increase its revenues due to its expansion in South America. The analyst also expects that the widget industry in general stands to gain from softness in the gizmo industry. Note also the figures: the share price is down in 2012, having reached its high late in 2011. (Don’t worry about the exact numbers at this stage; just take note that they’re there, and you can come back to them if you need to when you look at the questions.) The second analyst acknowledges that Next Widget has been very successful to date, but sees reason for concern. In support of her argument, she cites the declining rate of increase in the company’s revenues in 2010 and 2011 and increased domestic competition from another company. She is also not enthusiastic about the South American expansion, forecasting a loss at first for the company. This analyst quotes more figures than the first one. In addition to the declining rate of revenue increase, she also mentions the percent increase in the share price since the IPO and quotes the same high price as the one the first analyst mentions. Make a mental note and move on to the first question.

Step 2: Size up the question.

This is a yes/no question asking you to determine whether you can infer certain statements based on the two analyst reports. The statements appear to be self-contained to one tab per statement: that is, in this case you need to look only in the first tab for statements referring to the first analyst, and only in the second tab for statements referring to the second analyst.

Step 3: Answer the question:

Answer for Statement 1: Does the first analyst say anything about profits in South America? No, he expects a boost in revenues, but that’s about it. Therefore, you cannot infer that he expects Next Widget to make a profit in South America in the coming year.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 2: The second analyst mentions Widgitainers as an up-and-coming company that should give Next Widget increased competition in the future. However, the analyst makes no mention of Widgitainers’ stock.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 3: The second analyst says that Next Widget’s revenue increases of $210 million in 2010 and $193 million in 2011 were the smallest of the past decade, and that this trend will likely continue in 2012. What trend is this? If these two figures were the smallest in a decade, then the revenue increase in 2009 must have been greater than (or possibly equal to) the revenue increase in 2010.

Furthermore, the revenue increase in 2011 is smaller than that in 2010, so the trend the analyst mentions is that of a declining rate of revenue increase at least for the years 2009–2011. She expects this trend to continue, so she believes Next Widget will either not increase its revenues in 2012, or it will increase them by less than (or at least no more than) the 2011 figure: $193 million.

The correct answer is “Inferable.”­
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
No, top line is not profit but if the top line increases by 193 mil, we can expect the profit to increase by something less than that. Typically an increase in top line comes with an increase in cost too. Even if the cost stays the same, the increase in profit would be at most the increase in revenue. Cost cutting measures will invariably lead to lower revenue in the long run except in cases where only wastage is cut. Hence one can reasonably infer that if top line increases by about 193 million, the increase in profit will not exceed it.



RiyaJ0032
for statement 1c, can we consider a company's top line as company's profits?

No right

top line refers to sales

C is asking us about profits

while second analyst would hold the belief about company's top line

we cannot infer anything about profits

Can some expert please clarify?

KarishmaB
egmat
@Napolean97287
Sajjad1994

Deepa444
Sajjad1994 can u post the official solution for the first 3 sub questions?­
­
Official Explanation

­
1. For each of the following statements, select Inferable if the statement is reasonably inferable from the information provided. Otherwise, select Not inferable.

Explanation

Step 1: Begin with the big picture.


This prompt presents two sources of information, reports by two analysts about the company Next Widget. The first analyst believes the company’s stock is worth buying, whereas the second one disagrees. The first analyst supports his opinion by saying that Next Widget is a very successful company, has many popular products, and should increase its revenues due to its expansion in South America. The analyst also expects that the widget industry in general stands to gain from softness in the gizmo industry. Note also the figures: the share price is down in 2012, having reached its high late in 2011. (Don’t worry about the exact numbers at this stage; just take note that they’re there, and you can come back to them if you need to when you look at the questions.) The second analyst acknowledges that Next Widget has been very successful to date, but sees reason for concern. In support of her argument, she cites the declining rate of increase in the company’s revenues in 2010 and 2011 and increased domestic competition from another company. She is also not enthusiastic about the South American expansion, forecasting a loss at first for the company. This analyst quotes more figures than the first one. In addition to the declining rate of revenue increase, she also mentions the percent increase in the share price since the IPO and quotes the same high price as the one the first analyst mentions. Make a mental note and move on to the first question.

Step 2: Size up the question.

This is a yes/no question asking you to determine whether you can infer certain statements based on the two analyst reports. The statements appear to be self-contained to one tab per statement: that is, in this case you need to look only in the first tab for statements referring to the first analyst, and only in the second tab for statements referring to the second analyst.

Step 3: Answer the question:

Answer for Statement 1: Does the first analyst say anything about profits in South America? No, he expects a boost in revenues, but that’s about it. Therefore, you cannot infer that he expects Next Widget to make a profit in South America in the coming year.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 2: The second analyst mentions Widgitainers as an up-and-coming company that should give Next Widget increased competition in the future. However, the analyst makes no mention of Widgitainers’ stock.

The correct answer is “Not inferable.”

Answer for Statement 3: The second analyst says that Next Widget’s revenue increases of $210 million in 2010 and $193 million in 2011 were the smallest of the past decade, and that this trend will likely continue in 2012. What trend is this? If these two figures were the smallest in a decade, then the revenue increase in 2009 must have been greater than (or possibly equal to) the revenue increase in 2010.

Furthermore, the revenue increase in 2011 is smaller than that in 2010, so the trend the analyst mentions is that of a declining rate of revenue increase at least for the years 2009–2011. She expects this trend to continue, so she believes Next Widget will either not increase its revenues in 2012, or it will increase them by less than (or at least no more than) the 2011 figure: $193 million.

The correct answer is “Inferable.”­
User avatar
Dream009
Joined: 05 Nov 2024
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GPA: 84
WE:General Management (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 200
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB

Word 193 and 2012 is not in the same context. It saus 2011 revenue is 193 = and that 2012 sales uplift will continue in the next year. If it's not saying about profits - this should not be inferable.
KarishmaB
No, top line is not profit but if the top line increases by 193 mil, we can expect the profit to increase by something less than that. Typically an increase in top line comes with an increase in cost too. Even if the cost stays the same, the increase in profit would be at most the increase in revenue. Cost cutting measures will invariably lead to lower revenue in the long run except in cases where only wastage is cut. Hence one can reasonably infer that if top line increases by about 193 million, the increase in profit will not exceed it.




User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It is reasonably inferable.

This is what you need to reasonably infer:
The second analyst expects that Next Widget’s profits will not increase by more than $193 million in 2012.

This is what is given:
The revenue gains came mostly prior to 2009: The increases in the company’s top line of $210 million and $193 million in 2010 and 2011, respectively, were the smallest of the past decade. This trend is likely to continue in 2012, at least in the domestic market, given increased competition from the up-and-coming Widgitainers, Inc.

Furthermore, Next Widget’s planned expansion into South America may be trickier than expected. Even if successful in the long term, it will certainly contribute a loss in the near term, thus putting a strain on the company’s operating margins.

Now is a good time to sell your Next Widget stock.



Seeing how the second analyst has a dim view of the company, how the top line increase is 193 mil in 2011 and he expects the trend of decreasing "top line increases" to continue, he does not expect the company to increase profit by more than 193 mil in 2012.



Dream009
KarishmaB

Word 193 and 2012 is not in the same context. It saus 2011 revenue is 193 = and that 2012 sales uplift will continue in the next year. If it's not saying about profits - this should not be inferable.

Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts