It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 05:52

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

There is relativley little room for growth in the overall

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 9

There is relativley little room for growth in the overall [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 01:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

There is relativley little room for growth in the overall carpet market, which is tied to the size of the population. Most who purchase carpet do so only once or twice, first in their twenties ot thirties, and then perhaps again in their fifties or sixties. Thus as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share in the carpet market only through purchasing competitors, and not through more agressive marketing.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

(A) Most of the major carpet producers market other floor coverings as well.
(B) Most established carpet producers market several different brand names and varieties, and there is no remaining niche in the market for new brands to fill.
(C) Two of the three mergers in the industry's last ten years led to a decline in profits and revenues for the the newly merged companies.
(D) Price reductions, achieved by cost-cutting in production, by some of the dominant firms in the carpet market are causing other producers to leave the market altogether.
(E) The carpet market is unlike most markets in that consumers are becoming increasingly resistant to new patterns and styles.

NOTE: although it has been previosly discussed on the forum, im still not clear with the options

i went for B

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2008
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Location: Buffalo, NY
Schools: Simon '11
Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 05:27
I agree with B. If there is no additional market for other kinds of carpet, then the only way to gain market share would be to acquire another manufacturer's share.

This is my logic for the incorrect answers:

A) Out of scope. The author is talking about market share for carpeting, other floor covers are not applicable to this question.

C) Again, out of scope. The author is talking about market share. The concept of revenue is never addressed.

D) This is focused on something that would prevent a manufacturer from entering the market, not for a company searching to increase their market share.

E) This would actually support the author's conclusion that it would be impossible to innovate.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 541

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 92

WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 05:33
I went with B too

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 92

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 07:26
B for me.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 47 [2], given: 3

Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 09:28
2
This post received
KUDOS
The question asks to find out a premise which casts most doubt on the conclusion that the only way to increase the market share is to buy competitors...

But the option B supports the conclusion that buying the competitors.

BUT ISNT this wrong.

I will go with option D as it suggests that there are other ways to capture the market share and that way is price reductions.

Kudos [?]: 47 [2], given: 3

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 9

Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 22:17
i think ur right...this is what was confusing me...thanks a tonne...option D for me :)

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 9

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 785

Kudos [?]: 884 [0], given: 56

Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2009, 23:19
B is strengthening the argument, whereas we have been asked to select an option which weakens the argument.

Correct answer is D

(A) Most of the major carpet producers market other floor coverings as well. -Out of scope
(B) Most established carpet producers market several different brand names and varieties, and there is no remaining niche in the market for new brands to fill. -by saying "there is no remaining niche in the market for new brands" its strengthening the conclusion that there is no other way to increase market share
(C) Two of the three mergers in the industry's last ten years led to a decline in profits and revenues for the the newly merged companies. -Argument talking about market share, not profits and revenues.
(D) Price reductions, achieved by cost-cutting in production, by some of the dominant firms in the carpet market are causing other producers to leave the market altogether. -Correct. Weakens the conclusion that there is no other way to increase market share. If other producers are leaving due to some other reason, then automatically market share for the existing ones will increase
(E) The carpet market is unlike most markets in that consumers are becoming increasingly resistant to new patterns and styles. -Strengthening the argument. This means producers cannot increase market share by creating new patterns or designs
_________________

ISB 2011-12 thread | Ask ISB Alumni @ ThinkISB
All information related to Indian candidates and B-schools | Indian B-schools accepting GMAT scores
Self evaluation for Why MBA?

Kudos [?]: 884 [0], given: 56

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 3

Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2009, 18:42
arvs212 wrote:
There is relativley little room for growth in the overall carpet market, which is tied to the size of the population. Most who purchase carpet do so only once or twice, first in their twenties ot thirties, and then perhaps again in their fifties or sixties. Thus as the population ages, companies producing carpet will be able to gain market share in the carpet market only through purchasing competitors, and not through more agressive marketing.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

(A) Most of the major carpet producers market other floor coverings as well.
(B) Most established carpet producers market several different brand names and varieties, and there is no remaining niche in the market for new brands to fill.
(C) Two of the three mergers in the industry's last ten years led to a decline in profits and revenues for the the newly merged companies.
(D) Price reductions, achieved by cost-cutting in production, by some of the dominant firms in the carpet market are causing other producers to leave the market altogether.
(E) The carpet market is unlike most markets in that consumers are becoming increasingly resistant to new patterns and styles.


Conclusion: the ONLY WAY to gain market share is to purchase competing companies, not by more aggressive marketing.
I think (D) undermines this conclusion, it demonstrates ways other than mergers (namely cost-cutting & price reduction) by which companies can gain market share. I know this does not undermine the second part of the conclusion, which is that "aggressive marketing cannot increase market share", but I think (D) is still the best of the available choices.

A - Irrelevant, does not strengthen or weaken.
B - This seems to strengthen, rather than weaken the conclusion. It reinforces the conclusion that "there is NO OTHER WAY" by eliminating a possible method of competition (i.e. exploiting niche markets).
C - This weakens somewhat, it gives examples of failures of the current method (namely, buying out the competition), but it does not undermine the conclusion that buy-outs are the ONLY WAY.
E - This seems to strengthen the conclusion due to the same reason as B, it eliminates a course of action, which, if successful, might weaken the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 3

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 11

Re: carpet indstry [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2009, 09:35
D for me tooo.

When most of the guys are leaving the market there wont be any company to overtake.

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 11

Re: carpet indstry   [#permalink] 26 Jun 2009, 09:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Some statisticians claim that the surest way to increase the overall rs47 0 02 Oct 2016, 11:52
When the economy is in a recession, overall demand for goods vaivish1723 2 21 Jul 2009, 03:26
There is little point in looking to artists for nahid78 0 03 Apr 2017, 06:31
There is relatively little room for growth in the overall sperinko 6 21 Feb 2008, 07:25
There is relativley little room for growth in the overall bigtreezl 12 12 Nov 2009, 22:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

There is relativley little room for growth in the overall

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.