Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 23:55 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 23:55

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 1490
Own Kudos [?]: 1133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 Q50  V34
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 257 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: USA
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 240
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Chicago
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 468 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Total contribution by individuals to political parties were [#permalink]
I would choose E.
The point to focus here is not about the amount of contribution but about the active involvement of the people.
E clearly says that the number of people during this election was less. Irrespective of the amount of contribution, if people are less, they are more apathetic and not less.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 240
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Chicago
Send PM
Re: Total contribution by individuals to political parties were [#permalink]
[quote="JAI HIND"]I would choose E.
The point to focus here is not about the amount of contribution but about the active involvement of the people.
E clearly says that the number of people during this election was less. Irrespective of the amount of contribution, if people are less, they are more apathetic and not less.[/quote]

But in the question stem- the author is trying to conclude that "people are apathetic" based on the evidence that "less money is being spent". So shouldn't our answer also have that "money part" reflected in it?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 132
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Total contribution by individuals to political parties were [#permalink]
should be A !

A. HITS THE NAIL ---- The average contribution per individual actually declined during the same four year period. ie the electorate increased.

B. 15% Indicates some improvement in contribution but less than the rate of increase of contribution

C. Out of scope

D. Out of scope

E. Out of Scope
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: London
Send PM
Re: Total contribution by individuals to political parties were [#permalink]
IMO it should be E.


B C D, OUT OF SCOPE

[quote="ps_dahiya"]Total contribution by individuals to political parties were up 25 percent in this most recent presidential election over those of four years earlier. Hence, it is abvious that people are no longer as apathetic as they were, but they are taking a greater interest in politics.

Which of the following, if true, would most considerably weaken the preceding argument?

A. The average contribution per individual actually declined during the same four year period.

this means that more people are contributing, that results in a 25% increase in the contibution.
This does not mean greater interest in politics, it could mean that large number of people are taking interest in politics.


B. Per capita income of the polulation increased by 15 percent udring the four years in question.

C. Public leaders continue to warn citizens against the dangers of political apathy.

D. Contributions made by large corporations to political parties declined during the four year period.

E. Fewer people voted in the most recent presidential election than in the one four years earlier.

E. suggests people are less interested in politics and therfore they do not vote.
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 1490
Own Kudos [?]: 1133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 Q50  V34
Send PM
Re: Total contribution by individuals to political parties were [#permalink]
JAI HIND wrote:
I would choose E.
The point to focus here is not about the amount of contribution but about the active involvement of the people.
E clearly says that the number of people during this election was less. Irrespective of the amount of contribution, if people are less, they are more apathetic and not less.


OA is E and OE is above. The main point is "The point to focus here is not about the amount of contribution but about the active involvement of the people." as described by JAI HIND
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 109 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Chicago, IL
Send PM
Re: Total contribution by individuals to political parties were [#permalink]
straight E.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Total contribution by individuals to political parties were [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne