Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 100%
(00:54)
wrong
based on 2
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
We may say for a book, for example, that it has been very much praised, very much criticized, very much applauded, and so on, but not that it have been very praised, very criticized, or very applauded.
(A) for a book, for example, that it has been very much praised, very
much criticized, very much applauded, and so on, but not that it have
been very praised, very criticized, or
(B) of a book, for example, that it has been very much praised, very
much criticized, very much applauded, and so on, but not that it have
been very praised, very criticized, or
(C) of a book, for example, that it has been very much praised, very
much criticized, very much applauded, and so on, but not that it has been
very praised, very criticized, or
(D) of a book, for example, that it has been very much praised, very
much criticized, very much applauded, and so on, but not that it has been
very praised, very criticized, and
(E) of a book, for example, that it has been very much praised, very
much criticized, very much applauded, and so on, and not that it has been
very praised, very criticized, and
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
will go with D.
A & B make a mistake of using "have" for singular book.
"or" at the end of C and connecting that clauses by "and" in E seem to be wrong.
-vicks
ps: stolyar u may can easily get a job with ETS for setting such intimidating questions.
I think something cannot be VERY praised/applauded OR VERY criticize at the same time.
C will work for me.
Stolyar can get a ETS job, but he should know that "VERY" is not particularly preferred by ETS
Also, In long SC's, incorrect ETS sentences will have more than one error.
Thanks Praetorian
Show more
C is correct. The initial sentence is taken from a dictionary article discussing VERY. IMHO: Something CAN BE very praised OR very criticized at the same time (either praised or criticized). Something CANNOT BE very praised AND very criticized at the same time. So, the logic of the sentence seems OK.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.