Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 20:01 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 20:01

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools: NYU-R1 wait-list w/iv , Wharton-R2 (summer-waitlist; fall2010), INSEAD R2 (jan'11), CBS fall 2011 ED
 Q49  V38
Send PM
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: NYC
Schools:Wharton - Class of 2013
 Q50  V47
GPA: 3.4 princeton
WE 1: 2y bb ib
WE 2: 2y Mid market PE
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Schools: NYU-R1 wait-list w/iv , Wharton-R2 (summer-waitlist; fall2010), INSEAD R2 (jan'11), CBS fall 2011 ED
 Q49  V38
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Status:Darden Class of 2013
Posts: 1768
Own Kudos [?]: 1227 [0]
Given Kudos: 37
Schools:University of Virginia
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
lol. You guys are awesome.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 141
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
adalfu wrote:
My theme is also about "history never repeats, but it surely rhymes."

Oh man I used a line in my essay that is almost exactly like that. Bummer. Doubt that will change anything but looks like our essays aren't as "unique" as we'd hoped.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: NYC
Schools:Wharton - Class of 2013
 Q50  V47
GPA: 3.4 princeton
WE 1: 2y bb ib
WE 2: 2y Mid market PE
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
RFMBA2 wrote:
adalfu wrote:
My theme is also about "history never repeats, but it surely rhymes."

Oh man I used a line in my essay that is almost exactly like that. Bummer. Doubt that will change anything but looks like our essays aren't as "unique" as we'd hoped.


pet peeve of mine....unique is binary. something's unique or it's not. you can't be sorta one-of-a-kind....
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 141
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Wharton Applicant Grammar Discussion [#permalink]
Jmw125 wrote:
RFMBA2 wrote:
adalfu wrote:
My theme is also about "history never repeats, but it surely rhymes."

Oh man I used a line in my essay that is almost exactly like that. Bummer. Doubt that will change anything but looks like our essays aren't as "unique" as we'd hoped.


pet peeve of mine....unique is binary. something's unique or it's not. you can't be sorta one-of-a-kind....

That's exactly what I am saying. If unique is binary than our essays are no longer unique because there will be more than one with that line.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: NYC
Schools:Wharton - Class of 2013
 Q50  V47
GPA: 3.4 princeton
WE 1: 2y bb ib
WE 2: 2y Mid market PE
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
RFMBA2 wrote:
Jmw125 wrote:
RFMBA2 wrote:
Oh man I used a line in my essay that is almost exactly like that. Bummer. Doubt that will change anything but looks like our essays aren't as "unique" as we'd hoped.


pet peeve of mine....unique is binary. something's unique or it's not. you can't be sorta one-of-a-kind....

That's exactly what I am saying. If unique is binary than our essays are no longer unique because there will be more than one with that line.


I already got into an argument with someone about what qualifies as a haiku so don't want to argue over a definition, but.....

you said "as 'unique'" meaning that it still had some degree of unique-ness....
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 141
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
Jmw125 wrote:

I already got into an argument with someone about what qualifies as a haiku so don't want to argue over a definition, but.....

you said "as 'unique'" meaning that it still had some degree of unique-ness....

Either way it is a waste of time to argue about the word "unique." Bottom line is you know what I was trying to say, so if I offended you, sorry.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
1
Kudos
RFMBA2 wrote:
Jmw125 wrote:

I already got into an argument with someone about what qualifies as a haiku so don't want to argue over a definition, but.....

you said "as 'unique'" meaning that it still had some degree of unique-ness....

Either way it is a waste of time to argue about the word "unique." Bottom line is you know what I was trying to say, so if I offended you, sorry.


I wouldn't lose any sleep. He dropped his unique binary bomb on someone in the Harvard forum too.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: NYC
Schools:Wharton - Class of 2013
 Q50  V47
GPA: 3.4 princeton
WE 1: 2y bb ib
WE 2: 2y Mid market PE
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
bpenn wrote:
RFMBA2 wrote:
Jmw125 wrote:

I already got into an argument with someone about what qualifies as a haiku so don't want to argue over a definition, but.....

you said "as 'unique'" meaning that it still had some degree of unique-ness....

Either way it is a waste of time to argue about the word "unique." Bottom line is you know what I was trying to say, so if I offended you, sorry.


I wouldn't lose any sleep. He dropped his unique binary bomb on someone in the Harvard forum too.


haha...that's why i said it's a pet peeve....
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
lol you grammar nazi.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2010
Status:Applicant
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Stanford, Booth, Wharton, Harvard, Kellogg, Sloan
GPA: 3.68
WE 1: 2 Years Consulting
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
Quote:
pet peeve of mine....unique is binary. something's unique or it's not. you can't be sorta one-of-a-kind....


SO WRONG! Let's say a widget has 10 attributes. Widget a, attribute 1 is unique. Widget b, attributes 1, 2, and 3 are unique. Widget b is "more unique" than widget a.

Likewise with their essays. In so far as their shared quote is concerned, they are now each less unique, ie, less of the essay is unique. I am sure each essay still has unique components. But they are less unique.

Anyways dude, sounds like you belong in law school, not an mba program. :wink:
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: NYC
Schools:Wharton - Class of 2013
 Q50  V47
GPA: 3.4 princeton
WE 1: 2y bb ib
WE 2: 2y Mid market PE
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
dundundun wrote:
Quote:
pet peeve of mine....unique is binary. something's unique or it's not. you can't be sorta one-of-a-kind....


SO WRONG! Let's say a widget has 10 attributes. Widget a, attribute 1 is unique. Widget b, attributes 1, 2, and 3 are unique. Widget b is "more unique" than widget a.

Likewise with their essays. In so far as their shared quote is concerned, they are now each less unique, ie, less of the essay is unique. I am sure each essay still has unique components. But they are less unique.

Anyways dude, sounds like you belong in law school, not an mba program. :wink:


"Anyways dude, sounds like you belong in law school, not an mba program"...pot calling the kettle black?

Definition of unique:
–adjective
1.
existing as the only one or as the sole example; single; solitary in type or characteristics: a unique copy of an ancient manuscript.
2.
having no like or equal; unparalleled; incomparable: Bach was unique in his handling of counterpoint.
3.
limited in occurrence to a given class, situation, or area: a species unique to Australia.
4.
limited to a single outcome or result; without alternative possibilities: Certain types of problems have unique solutions

it's not additive
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2010
Status:Applicant
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Stanford, Booth, Wharton, Harvard, Kellogg, Sloan
GPA: 3.68
WE 1: 2 Years Consulting
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
Jmw125 wrote:
dundundun wrote:
Quote:
pet peeve of mine....unique is binary. something's unique or it's not. you can't be sorta one-of-a-kind....


SO WRONG! Let's say a widget has 10 attributes. Widget a, attribute 1 is unique. Widget b, attributes 1, 2, and 3 are unique. Widget b is "more unique" than widget a.

Likewise with their essays. In so far as their shared quote is concerned, they are now each less unique, ie, less of the essay is unique. I am sure each essay still has unique components. But they are less unique.

Anyways dude, sounds like you belong in law school, not an mba program. :wink:


"Anyways dude, sounds like you belong in law school, not an mba program"...pot calling the kettle black?

Definition of unique:
–adjective
1.
existing as the only one or as the sole example; single; solitary in type or characteristics: a unique copy of an ancient manuscript.
2.
having no like or equal; unparalleled; incomparable: Bach was unique in his handling of counterpoint.
3.
limited in occurrence to a given class, situation, or area: a species unique to Australia.
4.
limited to a single outcome or result; without alternative possibilities: Certain types of problems have unique solutions

it's not additive


Wow, if you are going to just google "unique" and copy-paste the first definition you find, YOU PROBABLY DON'T WANT TO EXCLUDE THE FIFTH BULLET THAT DISPROVES YOUR POINT.

–adjective
1.
existing as the only one or as the sole example; single; solitary in type or characteristics: a unique copy of an ancient manuscript.
2.
having no like or equal; unparalleled; incomparable: Bach was unique in his handling of counterpoint.
3.
limited in occurrence to a given class, situation, or area: a species unique to Australia.
4.
limited to a single outcome or result; without alternative possibilities: Certain types of problems have unique solutions.
5.
not typical; unusual: She has a very unique smile.
Current Student
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 302
Own Kudos [?]: 75 [1]
Given Kudos: 288
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Alright you guys, let's not crowd this thread with grammar wars. Let's keep it relevant to Wharton application.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 224 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
dundundun wrote:
5.
not typical; unusual: She has a very unique smile.


good counter. QED (?) :wink:

Anyways, please refer to Garner's Modern American Usage for the correct usage. This book is the authority on grammar and style. (I don't have a hard copy with me at work, but I believe it's perfectly okay to say "as unique" or "more unique" etc.) Style is always evolving, so it might be fine with that usage.

An example is the word "enthused." According to Shrunk & White, you should NEVER use that verb... instead use the more appropriate form with the adj "enthusiastic." But in today's world, I see that verb all the time!
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 594
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [1]
Given Kudos: 295
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
1
Kudos
w103psp wrote:
Alright you guys, let's not crowd this thread with grammar wars. Let's keep it relevant to Wharton application.


Agreed with w103psp. It's all subjective semantics. Let's keep the grammar pissing contest elsewhere please and discuss Wharton-relevant topics.
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Posts: 495
Own Kudos [?]: 373 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Concentration: Finance & Strategic Management
Schools:Wharton/Lauder Class of 2013
 Q50  V41
GPA: 3.6
WE 1: Big Four Advisory
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
Quote:
Many authors of usage guides, editors, teachers, and others feel strongly that such “absolute” words as complete, equal, perfect, and especially unique cannot be compared because of their “meaning”: a word that denotes an absolute condition cannot be described as denoting more or less than that absolute condition. However, all such words have undergone semantic development and are used in a number of senses, some of which can be compared by words like more, very, most, absolutely, somewhat, and totally and some of which cannot.
The earliest meanings of unique when it entered English around the beginning of the 17th century were “single, sole” and “having no equal.” By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared: The foliage on the late-blooming plants is more unique than that on the earlier varieties. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.


Welcome to the 21st century, Jmw125! :)
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Oct 2010
Posts: 332
Own Kudos [?]: 62 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: NYC
Schools:Wharton - Class of 2013
 Q50  V47
GPA: 3.4 princeton
WE 1: 2y bb ib
WE 2: 2y Mid market PE
Send PM
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
staind wrote:
Quote:
Many authors of usage guides, editors, teachers, and others feel strongly that such “absolute” words as complete, equal, perfect, and especially unique cannot be compared because of their “meaning”: a word that denotes an absolute condition cannot be described as denoting more or less than that absolute condition. However, all such words have undergone semantic development and are used in a number of senses, some of which can be compared by words like more, very, most, absolutely, somewhat, and totally and some of which cannot.
The earliest meanings of unique when it entered English around the beginning of the 17th century were “single, sole” and “having no equal.” By the mid-19th century unique had developed a wider meaning, “not typical, unusual,” and it is in this wider sense that it is compared: The foliage on the late-blooming plants is more unique than that on the earlier varieties. The comparison of so-called absolutes in senses that are not absolute is standard in all varieties of speech and writing.


Welcome to the 21st century, Jmw125! :)


guess i'm old fashioned....
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Calling all Wharton 2011 Applicants [#permalink]
 1   2   

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne