Kestone BunuelWhich of the following most logically completes the argument below?
When malaria rates in a tropical country are high, drug companies reduce the cost of many kinds of anti-parasite medications. The reason is that drug companies want to take in as much money as possible in medication sales so that they can invest the money into research for more profitable drugs. Anti-parasite drug cost reductions are likely to achieve this objective since __________.
(A) when prices decrease, more companies enter the market with competing anti-parasite drugs--->
This will weaken the argument and can not logically complete it.(B) drug companies that spend a smaller percentage of revenues on research are unable to take advantage of anti-parasite drug cost reductions for this reason--->
The argument should logically complete with the argument with more sales of the drug. It is irrelevant with a smaller percentage of research etc.(C) many more people will purchase anti-parasite medications if the price is lower than if the price remained the same--->
Logically correct. The more the sales the more money the company can make(D) an increase in the number of anti-parasite drugs sold raises the likelihood that some species of parasite will mutate so that the drug is not effective against it--->
Totally out of context(E) resulting research is unlikely to result in a malaria vaccine
Malaria vaccine is an alien word so out of context