GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Feb 2019, 18:48

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• Free GMAT RC Webinar

February 23, 2019

February 23, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT
• FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

February 24, 2019

February 24, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 114
Location: India
GMAT Date: 03-15-2015
WE: Education (Education)

Show Tags

03 Feb 2019, 21:23
4
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (02:23) correct 54% (02:21) wrong based on 67 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.5% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the corresponding probability for all the children across the nation, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.52%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides a statement that the argument as a whole seeks to establish
B) The first describes the position that the argument as a whole seeks to establish; the second does not dispute that position
C) The first describes the evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion
D) The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.
E) The first and second both state observations that support jointly the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

_________________

Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 11
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2019, 23:46
1
Both first and second are the statements which support the conclusion of the argument.

I chose to go with option E

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 59
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Show Tags

04 Feb 2019, 00:41
4d wrote:
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, there is hardly any concrete data to back up their claims. Not only is the efficacy of the vaccines questionable but there are also possible chances that vaccines cause various illnesses such as autism. Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of 0.5% of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against while the corresponding probability for all the children across the nation, including the children who have not been vaccinated, is 0.52%. So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides a statement that the argument as a whole seeks to establish
B) The first describes the position that the argument as a whole seeks to establish; the second does not dispute that position
C) The first describes the evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion
D) The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.
E) The first and second both state observations that support jointly the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

IMO E.

The first bold statement is an opinion, position or observation rather than a circumstance or evidence. So options A and C are out.

Option B - Second statement is providing stats which are aligned to the first statement. Its not disputing but a more proper answer would demand how it is supporting first statement. Option B is out.

Option D - Argument is opposing benefits of vaccination not what's stated in the first statement rather first statement forms the first step towards the opposition.

Option E - First and second statements both can be regarded as observations and based on these observations the conclusion is derived that Vaccination hardly serves as an improvement for preventing diseases.
------------------------------------------------------
Manager
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 114
Location: India
GMAT Date: 03-15-2015
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Feb 2019, 05:18
In E
How is the second statement a observation ? Its a fact .

Whereas i dont find anything wrong with B
_________________

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 59
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Show Tags

04 Feb 2019, 06:16
4d wrote:
In E
How is the second statement a observation ? Its a fact .

Whereas i dont find anything wrong with B

In option B, it says, 'the second does not dispute that position. In more direct words, it can be interpreted as 'the second agrees with that position'.
So does it agree? No, the two statements can be seen as two separate premises not supporting each other but supporting the conclusion.

Even if you consider second as fact, it fits only in option E.

------------------------------------------------------
Manager
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 114
Location: India
GMAT Date: 03-15-2015
WE: Education (Education)
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Feb 2019, 08:33
GMATMBA5

the second does not dispute that position -- doesn't mean it agrees with that position
_________________

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 120
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Feb 2019, 21:43
4d wrote:
In E
How is the second statement a observation ? Its a fact .

Whereas i dont find anything wrong with B

Even I marked B for same reason

The second statement is like an evidence that there is data to claim that getting vaccinated is not of much use

First stmnt says there is no much data to claim that vaccinations are effective

So as per B stmnt 2 does not oppose the stmnt 1

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't stop when you are tired , stop when you are DONE .

Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children,   [#permalink] 04 Feb 2019, 21:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by