Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 01:47 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 01:47

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 362 [12]
Given Kudos: 44
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 11
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 188 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 362 [0]
Given Kudos: 44
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
In E
How is the second statement a observation ? Its a fact .

Whereas i dont find anything wrong with B
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 188 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
4d wrote:
In E
How is the second statement a observation ? Its a fact .

Whereas i dont find anything wrong with B


In option B, it says, 'the second does not dispute that position. In more direct words, it can be interpreted as 'the second agrees with that position'.
So does it agree? No, the two statements can be seen as two separate premises not supporting each other but supporting the conclusion.

Even if you consider second as fact, it fits only in option E.

------------------------------------------------------
Kudos if helpful!
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 362 [0]
Given Kudos: 44
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V37
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
GMATMBA5

the second does not dispute that position -- doesn't mean it agrees with that position
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 104 [0]
Given Kudos: 105
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
4d wrote:
In E
How is the second statement a observation ? Its a fact .

Whereas i dont find anything wrong with B


Even I marked B for same reason

The second statement is like an evidence that there is data to claim that getting vaccinated is not of much use

First stmnt says there is no much data to claim that vaccinations are effective

So as per B stmnt 2 does not oppose the stmnt 1

Experts please help

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 168 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
Hey akshata19 not an expert but here are my two cents

In option B BF1 is not the position the argument as a whole seeks to establish (this line states that BF1 is the main conclusion of the argument) It is not the main conclusion of the argument. This is the main conclusion : So, there is hardly any improvement in the prevention rate because of vaccination..

As for BF2 : the second does not dispute that position : this part is correct

the option is wrong cause of BF1
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 168 [0]
Given Kudos: 77
Location: India
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
A) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides a statement that the argument as a whole seeks to establish.

The first describes the circumstance
Yes. We can call it a current situation or circumstance.
that the argument as a whole seeks to explain;
No. The purpose of the argument is not to explain why there is hardly any data available.
the second provides a statement
Yes.
that the argument as a whole seeks to establish.
No. The second boldface is a fact. The argument cannot establish a fact. The fact is being used to establish the main conclusion.


Thus, this is not the correct answer choice.


B) The first describes the position that the argument as a whole seeks to establish; the second does not dispute that position.

The first describes the position
No. It states an observation and not a conclusion or position taken by someone.
that the argument as a whole seeks to establish;
No. This is not the main conclusion of the argument.
the second does not dispute that position.
Yes. BF2 does not go against BF1 although it is not a conclusion.


Thus, this is not the correct answer choice.


C) The first describes the evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.

The first describes the evidence
Yes. Since this fact or observation has been used to support a conclusion, we can call it evidence.
in support of the main conclusion of the argument;
Yes.
the second states that conclusion.
No. BF2 is a fact and not the main conclusion.


Thus, this is not the correct answer choice.


D) The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.

The first is the position
No. It is an observation, not a conclusion and so cannot be called a position.
that the argument as a whole opposes;
No. The argument does not go against this observation.
the second provides evidence
Yes. Since this fact or observation has been used to support a conclusion, we can call it evidence.
against the position being opposed.
No. BF2 does not go against BF1.

Thus, this is not the correct answer choice.


E) The first and second both state observations that support jointly the conclusion of the argument as a whole.

The first and second both state observations
Yes. They are facts observed by the author.
that support jointly the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
Yes. They support the main conclusion.


Thus, this is the correct answer choice.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 178 [0]
Given Kudos: 186
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
How can the lack of any claim implies that there is no improvement?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17227
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children, [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne