Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 04:49 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 04:49

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2017
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [8]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2017
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Nov 2016
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 63 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 325
Own Kudos [?]: 1664 [0]
Given Kudos: 348
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
Send PM
While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children [#permalink]
Conclusion: Vaccination is not any helpful
Reasoning: It increases the chances of Autism and slightly lower probability of getting the disease ( for which they have been vaccinated) than the general population)

Type: Weaken


A. A recent study investigating the possible causes of autism found out that the incidence of autism in children who have been vaccinated was slightly higher than children who have not been vaccinated. Strengthen the conclusion

B. Since vaccination was made compulsory for children to be eligible for medical aid, the national average for the incidence of such diseases has increased. Out Of Scope

C. A recent study concluded that before vaccination, a large majority of children who are now vaccinated possessed the immune system much weaker than that of those who are not. Correct as it shows the author is comparing the different set of population and vaccination is helpful as it increased the weak immune system of administered children

D. The original immune system on birth for the children who have been vaccinated and for the children who have not been vaccinated is, on average, of equal strength.Strengthen the conclusion


E. A number of states have made vaccination compulsory for the children.Out Of Scope


DM if you have any queries.I would love to help :)

Originally posted by AshutoshB on 16 May 2020, 22:52.
Last edited by AshutoshB on 25 May 2020, 10:10, edited 1 time in total.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7628 [0]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children [#permalink]
tejaswym95 wrote:
Hello experts, GMATNinja

Could you please explain, in option C, how does information before the vaccination help us undermine the conclusion? Rather it shouldve been that the children had much stronger immune system after vaccination.


Hi Tejaswy

Let me try to address your query.

The conclusion given in the stimulus is that "there is hardly any benefit derived from vaccinations", which we are asked to weaken. Therefore, we are looking for answer options that speak to the benefits of vaccination.

Option (C) states: "...before vaccination, a large majority of children who are now vaccinated possessed immune system much weaker than that of those who are not."

We also know from the stimulus that "Children who have been vaccinated have a probability of getting the diseases that they have been vaccinated against just slightly lower than national average of all children including the children who have not been vaccinated."

Hence, the complementary set ie; children who have not been vaccinated, must have a higher probability of getting these diseases than the children who have been vaccinated. Combining this with option (C), which says that pre-vaccination, these children had a much weaker immune system, we can reach the conclusion that the immune system of the vaccinated children became stronger post vaccination, providing a benefit of vaccination (that of strengthening the immune system). Therefore, this option weakens the argument.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17227
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: While proponents argue about the benefits of vaccination for children [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne