Question 1
woohoo921
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have a few follow-up questions below after reading through your explanations.
For question 576 (the passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats), can someone please further clarify why Choice B is incorrect? I see why Choice C is correct. However, the passage does mention Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species." So, P. ochraceus does seem to depend on the degree to which other animals prey on mussels (based on its relation to when starfish are present or absent). What am I missing?
For question 578 (which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage (lines 24-31), why doesn't Choice A fall under "community diversity" in that bats managing the size of the insect population and the size of the insect population manages the bird population?
Thank you so much again for all of your time, help, and dedication.
Take another look t that line of the passage: "Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of
this starfish can be a dominant species."
"
This starfish" refers to P. ochraceus. In other words, P. ochraceus IS the starfish. So, there's no interaction between P. ochraceus and other starfish. Eliminate (B) for question 1.
Question 3
The hypothesis in the last line of the passage states that
context is important for determining keystone status. For example, a
change in species diversity could strip a species of its keystone status, or thrusts a non-keystone species into a keystone role.
Answer choice (A) really doesn't tell us anything about species diversity. Sure, we've got bats, birds, and insects, but is that a diverse ecosystem? There's no way of knowing. Also, it really doesn't capture the idea that a
change in species diversity could change keystone status. It could be that these animals have existed just like this for a long time, and the keystone species have also remained the same (instead of shifting when the context changes). Because (A) doesn't support the hypothesis that keystone status is dependent on context, you can eliminate (A).
I hope that helps!
I have one follow-up question. For question 3, you noted the importance of "change" in community diversity.
For future passages, should the takeaway be that it is important to read what is in the parenthesis, as community diversity is qualified to be essentially a change in community diversity... and not broadly speaking diversity (how I understood it)? I thought that was in the parentheses after community diversity was just an example. Thank you again.