Last visit was: 01 May 2026, 16:31 It is currently 01 May 2026, 16:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 (Medium)|   Science|   Short Passage|                                    
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,448
Own Kudos:
79,469
 [1]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,448
Kudos: 79,469
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,448
Own Kudos:
79,469
 [2]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,448
Kudos: 79,469
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ag153
KarishmaB

1. Yes but that does not stop it from being a factor. As from the passage, we jsut need to determine the factor not say whether factor holds true as per passage or not?

2. Can you pls elaborate more on your point in C by relating to passage?

3. What do these 2 sentences mean? Pls explain the sentence by breaking the sentence structure up and what roles do they play in the passage or wat insight do they provide:
a. But such predation on a dominant or potentially dominant species occurs in systems that do as well as in systems that do not have species that play keystone roles.

b.Moreover, whereas P. ochraceus occupies an unambiguous keystone role on wave-exposed rocky headlands, in more wave-sheltered habitats the impact of P. ochraceus predation is weak or nonexistent, and at certain sites sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussels.--- Doesn't this imply that impact of P's predation is weak at both wave sheltered habits AND at sites where sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussells?


The passage MENTIONS ONLY "wave exposure" as a factor -
whereas P. ochraceus occupies an unambiguous keystone role on wave-exposed rocky headlands, in more wave-sheltered habitats the impact of P. ochraceus predation is weak or nonexistent, and (next is an independent clause joined with comma and 'and' so it doesn't have any connection to the previous clause)

P. ochraceus is keystone in wave exposed regions but in more wave sheltered, it isn't.

"at certain sites sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussels." only means that at some places, sand burial eliminated mussels. We don't even know whether P. ochraceus is present there or not, whether mussels ae dominant species there or not etc. We cannot assume anything.

Look at the sentences you mentioned in context. Here is the SIMPLIFIED PASSAGE:

The dominant species plays a crucial role in making an ecosystem what it is. Also, a keystone species (whose effect is much larger despite a relatively small population) play a crucial role too.
We can't remove the keystone species and then observe changes in ecosystem to establish that it is indeed a keystone species. So how do we come to know which species is keystone, if there is one?

Certain traits define a species as a keystone species e.g. P. ochraceus eliminates mussels which will become dominant without P. ochraceus. But that doesn't mean all predators of dominant or would be dominant species are keystone. Such predators exist in ecosystems that have keystone species as well as in ecosystems that do not have keystone species.
Also P. ochraceus is keystone on wave exposed rocks but not on wave sheltered. Also, there are other ways to eliminate mussels in other regions.

So what makes a species keystone? It depends on geography, community diversity, length of species interaction etc.
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 493
Kudos: 150
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Question 1


sagarsangani123
Dear Experts,

Though for question 1), the OA is (A), I am confused between (A) and (B). The passage mentions that: "whereas P. ochraceus occupies an unambiguous keystone role on wave-exposed rocky headlands, in more wave-sheltered habitats the impact of P. ochraceus predation is weak or nonexistent, and at certain sites sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussels". . Can't answer choice (B) be inferred from the boldfaced part?


1. The passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats?

(A) The degree to which the habitat is sheltered from waves

(B) The degree to which other animals within a habitat prey on mussels


Kindly help resolve.
Thanks!
First, it’s important to clearly identify what exactly question 1 is asking for. Take a closer look:

Quote:
1. The passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats?
The question does not ask us to find an answer choice that can be inferred on the basis of the passage. Rather, it asks for an answer choice that is mentioned in the passage. This subtle, but important, distinction means that we’re looking for an answer choice that is explicitly mentioned in the passage.

With that in mind, here’s (B):

Quote:
(B) The degree to which other animals within a habitat prey on mussels
The quote you referenced from the passage indicates that “at certain sites sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussels.” But sand burial is not an animal. So, while we could infer that in certain habitats the degree to which other animals prey on mussels affects whether or not P. ochraceus is a keystone species, that is not mentioned in the passage. Eliminate (B).

I hope that helps!

GMATNinja

Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have a few follow-up questions below after reading through your explanations.

For question 576 (the passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats), can someone please further clarify why Choice B is incorrect? I see why Choice C is correct. However, the passage does mention Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species." So, P. ochraceus does seem to depend on the degree to which other animals prey on mussels (based on its relation to when starfish are present or absent). What am I missing?

For question 578 (which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage (lines 24-31), why doesn't Choice A fall under "community diversity" in that bats managing the size of the insect population and the size of the insect population manages the bird population? 

Thank you so much again for all of your time, help, and dedication.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,843
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,843
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 1


woohoo921


Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have a few follow-up questions below after reading through your explanations.

For question 576 (the passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats), can someone please further clarify why Choice B is incorrect? I see why Choice C is correct. However, the passage does mention Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species." So, P. ochraceus does seem to depend on the degree to which other animals prey on mussels (based on its relation to when starfish are present or absent). What am I missing?

For question 578 (which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage (lines 24-31), why doesn't Choice A fall under "community diversity" in that bats managing the size of the insect population and the size of the insect population manages the bird population? 

Thank you so much again for all of your time, help, and dedication.
Take another look t that line of the passage: "Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species."

"This starfish" refers to P. ochraceus. In other words, P. ochraceus IS the starfish. So, there's no interaction between P. ochraceus and other starfish. Eliminate (B) for question 1.

Question 3


The hypothesis in the last line of the passage states that context is important for determining keystone status. For example, a change in species diversity could strip a species of its keystone status, or thrusts a non-keystone species into a keystone role.

Answer choice (A) really doesn't tell us anything about species diversity. Sure, we've got bats, birds, and insects, but is that a diverse ecosystem? There's no way of knowing. Also, it really doesn't capture the idea that a change in species diversity could change keystone status. It could be that these animals have existed just like this for a long time, and the keystone species have also remained the same (instead of shifting when the context changes). Because (A) doesn't support the hypothesis that keystone status is dependent on context, you can eliminate (A).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 493
Kudos: 150
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Question 1


woohoo921


Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have a few follow-up questions below after reading through your explanations.

For question 576 (the passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats), can someone please further clarify why Choice B is incorrect? I see why Choice C is correct. However, the passage does mention Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species." So, P. ochraceus does seem to depend on the degree to which other animals prey on mussels (based on its relation to when starfish are present or absent). What am I missing?

For question 578 (which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage (lines 24-31), why doesn't Choice A fall under "community diversity" in that bats managing the size of the insect population and the size of the insect population manages the bird population? 

Thank you so much again for all of your time, help, and dedication.
Take another look t that line of the passage: "Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species."

"This starfish" refers to P. ochraceus. In other words, P. ochraceus IS the starfish. So, there's no interaction between P. ochraceus and other starfish. Eliminate (B) for question 1.

Question 3


The hypothesis in the last line of the passage states that context is important for determining keystone status. For example, a change in species diversity could strip a species of its keystone status, or thrusts a non-keystone species into a keystone role.

Answer choice (A) really doesn't tell us anything about species diversity. Sure, we've got bats, birds, and insects, but is that a diverse ecosystem? There's no way of knowing. Also, it really doesn't capture the idea that a change in species diversity could change keystone status. It could be that these animals have existed just like this for a long time, and the keystone species have also remained the same (instead of shifting when the context changes). Because (A) doesn't support the hypothesis that keystone status is dependent on context, you can eliminate (A).

I hope that helps!

GMATNinja
Thank you!
I have one follow-up question. For question 3, you noted the importance of "change" in community diversity.

For future passages, should the takeaway be that it is important to read what is in the parenthesis, as community diversity is qualified to be essentially a change in community diversity... and not broadly speaking diversity (how I understood it)? I thought that was in the parentheses after community diversity was just an example. Thank you again.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,843
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
GMATNinja

Question 1


woohoo921


Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have a few follow-up questions below after reading through your explanations.

For question 576 (the passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats), can someone please further clarify why Choice B is incorrect? I see why Choice C is correct. However, the passage does mention Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species." So, P. ochraceus does seem to depend on the degree to which other animals prey on mussels (based on its relation to when starfish are present or absent). What am I missing?

For question 578 (which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage (lines 24-31), why doesn't Choice A fall under "community diversity" in that bats managing the size of the insect population and the size of the insect population manages the bird population? 

Thank you so much again for all of your time, help, and dedication.
Take another look t that line of the passage: "Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species."

"This starfish" refers to P. ochraceus. In other words, P. ochraceus IS the starfish. So, there's no interaction between P. ochraceus and other starfish. Eliminate (B) for question 1.

Question 3


The hypothesis in the last line of the passage states that context is important for determining keystone status. For example, a change in species diversity could strip a species of its keystone status, or thrusts a non-keystone species into a keystone role.

Answer choice (A) really doesn't tell us anything about species diversity. Sure, we've got bats, birds, and insects, but is that a diverse ecosystem? There's no way of knowing. Also, it really doesn't capture the idea that a change in species diversity could change keystone status. It could be that these animals have existed just like this for a long time, and the keystone species have also remained the same (instead of shifting when the context changes). Because (A) doesn't support the hypothesis that keystone status is dependent on context, you can eliminate (A).

I hope that helps!

GMATNinja
Thank you!
I have one follow-up question. For question 3, you noted the importance of "change" in community diversity.

For future passages, should the takeaway be that it is important to read what is in the parenthesis, as community diversity is qualified to be essentially a change in community diversity... and not broadly speaking diversity (how I understood it)? I thought that was in the parentheses after community diversity was just an example. Thank you again.
You're right that the author uses "a reduction in species diversity" as an example. But what does this example support? It supports the hypothesis that keystone status depends on context. The example supports this hypothesis because as species diversity changes (i.e., the context changes), keystone status changes.

So, it's not enough just to connect to species diversity -- you have to connect to the actual hypothesis about context impacting keystone status.

In terms of takeaways for future passages: it's important to read every word of the passage, even the bits in parentheses. Even if you don't memorize the details on your first read though (and you absolutely should not do that!), you should definitely know why the author has included the example -- in this case, to support the hypothesis about context. Then, when you get to something like question 1, go back to the relevant piece of the passage and really investigate the details before diving into the answer choices.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 522
Location: India
Posts: 294
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB GMATNinja

For Q1, why E is incorrect?
(E) The fact that there is great species diversity within some habitats occupied by P. ochraceus
Author has mentioned in the last sentence that species diversity could impact the keystone species status. Why E is incorrect then. I agree that community diversity could affect when a reduction in species diversity occur but in broader terms, diversity in general could affect.

In Q4, why C is incorrect?
(C) Such an identification is likely to be less reliable as an ecosystem becomes less diverse.
Acc to last line, identification depends on a diverse environment. So a less diverse environment could affect keystone status. Why can't we infer C from this sentence.

Thank you for your time :)
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,843
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,843
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 1


Sneha2021
url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=KarishmaB]KarishmaB[/url] url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja]GMATNinja[/url]

For Q1, why E is incorrect?
(E) The fact that there is great species diversity within some habitats occupied by P. ochraceus
Author has mentioned in the last sentence that species diversity could impact the keystone species status. Why E is incorrect then. I agree that community diversity could affect when a reduction in species diversity occur but in broader terms, diversity in general could affect.
Question 1 asks us which answer is specifically mentioned in the passage regarding P. ochraceus.

In that last sentence, the author isn't talking specifically about P. ochraceus any more. Instead, he/she is talking generally about what might keystone status for any species.

So, could great species diversity within some habitats occupied by P. ochraceus impact its keystone status? Sure! But the author doesn't mention that species diversity ACTUALLY impacts P. ochraceus's status. By contrast, the author DOES specifically mention that P. ochraceus's role is impacted by the degree to which its habitat is sheltered from waves.

(E) is out and (A) is the correct answer for question 1.

Question 4


Sneha2021
url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=KarishmaB]KarishmaB[/url] url=[https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja]GMATNinja[/url]

In Q4, why C is incorrect?
(C) Such an identification is likely to be less reliable as an ecosystem becomes less diverse.
Acc to last line, identification depends on a diverse environment. So a less diverse environment could affect keystone status. Why can't we infer C from this sentence.

Thank you for your time :)
Here's the exact language of question 4:
Quote:
4. The passage suggests which of the following about the identification of a species as a keystone species?
(C) then says that "such an identification is likely to be less reliable as an ecosystem becomes less diverse."

Hmm. (C) isn't directly talking about how to tell whether something is a keystone species (and your'e absolutely right that a less diverse environment could affect keystone status). This is talking about how reliable the identification is. In other words, how sure are you that a certain species is or is not a keystone?

There's nothing in the passage implying that this identification is more or less reliable in one situation or another. You could be very confident about whether something is a keystone in a very diverse environment, and equally confident about whether its a keystone in a non-diverse environment.

We can eliminate (C) for question 4 because there's nothing implying that one situation makes identifying keystone species less reliable than another.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Yuki2202
Joined: 09 Jan 2024
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 12
Given Kudos: 63
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 600 Q37 V37
GMAT 1: 600 Q37 V37
Posts: 12
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

Question 1


woohoo921


Thank you for your thorough explanation. I have a few follow-up questions below after reading through your explanations.

For question 576 (the passage mentions which of the following as a factor that affects the role of P. ochraceus as a keystone species within different habitats), can someone please further clarify why Choice B is incorrect? I see why Choice C is correct. However, the passage does mention Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species." So, P. ochraceus does seem to depend on the degree to which other animals prey on mussels (based on its relation to when starfish are present or absent). What am I missing?

For question 578 (which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage (lines 24-31), why doesn't Choice A fall under "community diversity" in that bats managing the size of the insect population and the size of the insect population manages the bird population? 

Thank you so much again for all of your time, help, and dedication.
Take another look t that line of the passage: "Pisaster ochraceus is often a keystone predator because it consumes and suppresses mussel populations, which in the absence of this starfish can be a dominant species."

"This starfish" refers to P. ochraceus. In other words, P. ochraceus IS the starfish. So, there's no interaction between P. ochraceus and other starfish. Eliminate (B) for question 1.

Question 3


The hypothesis in the last line of the passage states that context is important for determining keystone status. For example, a change in species diversity could strip a species of its keystone status, or thrusts a non-keystone species into a keystone role.

Answer choice (A) really doesn't tell us anything about species diversity. Sure, we've got bats, birds, and insects, but is that a diverse ecosystem? There's no way of knowing. Also, it really doesn't capture the idea that a change in species diversity could change keystone status. It could be that these animals have existed just like this for a long time, and the keystone species have also remained the same (instead of shifting when the context changes). Because (A) doesn't support the hypothesis that keystone status is dependent on context, you can eliminate (A).

I hope that helps!
­Dear GMAT Ninja, for Q3, in the paragraph, the author said that Keystone status appears to depend on context, whether of particular geography or of such factors as community diversity (for example, a reduction in species diversity may thrust more of the remaining species into keystone roles), so how about "A species of bat is primarily responsible for keeping insect populations within an ecosystem low", can we infer that this is also support for determining bad is the keystone species? 
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,843
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


Yuki2202
Dear GMAT Ninja, for Q3, in the paragraph, the author said that Keystone status appears to depend on context, whether of particular geography or of such factors as community diversity (for example, a reduction in species diversity may thrust more of the remaining species into keystone roles), so how about "A species of bat is primarily responsible for keeping insect populations within an ecosystem low", can we infer that this is also support for determining bad is the keystone species? 
­Choice (B) works because it's evidence that context matters: in one geography, the iguana is a keystone species, but in another geography, it isn't.

Choice (A), on the other hand, does not illustrate how context matters. And keeping insect populations low is not the same as reducing species diversity. If you start with, say, 50 species and then reduce all of their populations, you'd still have 50 species -- so there would be no change in the species diversity.

If we were told that the bat became a keystone species ONLY AFTER there was a reduction in species diversity, then we'd have some support for the last sentence. But that's not what we get in choice (A).

For more on (A) vs (B), check out this post: https://gmatclub.com/forum/while-the-mo ... l#p2708389.
User avatar
teneturassumenda
Joined: 04 Feb 2026
Last visit: 30 Apr 2026
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Human Resources
GPA: 7.57
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is D not the correct answer for #3?
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 1,055
Own Kudos:
11,489
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,055
Kudos: 11,489
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
teneturassumenda
Why is D not the correct answer for #3?
Question 3:

Because (D) does not support the last sentence’s claim that keystone status depends on context (geography, diversity, or length of interaction). It only says within the same context, if that bee becomes more abundant, its effect grows. That is just “more individuals, bigger impact,” not “same species is keystone here but not there because conditions differ.”
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 1,055
Own Kudos:
11,489
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,055
Kudos: 11,489
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3. Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the argument about keystone status advanced in the last sentence of the passage?

The last sentence says keystone status depends on context, including geography, community diversity (lower diversity can push more remaining species into keystone roles), and how long species have been interacting (new arrivals can have big effects). So the best support should show the same species being keystone in one context but not in another due to those factors.

(A) A bat keeps insects low, which affects birds.

This describes a strong ecological effect, but it does not show context dependence. It could be keystone, but it does not support the “depends on diversity/geography/time” claim.

(B) An iguana is keystone on certain islands but not on adjacent islands with more animal species.

This directly supports context dependence tied to community diversity: more diverse islands do not give the iguana a keystone role, while less diverse ones do. That matches the last sentence most clearly.

(C) More species occupy keystone roles than previously believed.

This is about undercounting keystone roles, not about why keystone status depends on context.

(D) As a keystone bee becomes more abundant it has a larger effect.

That is about abundance scaling, not context dependence.

(E) A keystone moth develops camouflage.

That is about an evolutionary trait, not about context dependence of keystone status.

Answer: (B)
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
513 posts
363 posts