Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 19:28

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# You got 2 minutes. Go!! Unless negotions begin soon, the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5222
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

You got 2 minutes. Go!! Unless negotions begin soon, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 06:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

You got 2 minutes. Go!!

Unless negotions begin soon, the cease-fire will be violated by one of the two sides to the dispute. Negotions will be held only if other countries have pressured the two sides to negotiate; an argument will emerge only if other countries continue such pressure throughout the negotions. But no negotiations will be held until international troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated their ability to counter any agression from either side, thus suppressing a major incentive for the two sides to resume fighting.

If the statements above are true, and if negotions between the two sides do begin soon, at the time home negotiations begin each of the folllowing must also be true EXCEPT:

A) The cease-fire has not been violated by either of the two sides

B) International troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated that they can counter aggression from either of the two sides.

C) A major incentive for the two sides to resume hostilities has been suppressed.

D) Other countries have exerted pressure on the two sides to the dispute.

E) The negotiations' reaching an agreement depends in part on the actions of other countries.
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 06:10
is it (E)
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 789
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 06:33
Think it should be C)
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1263
Followers: 29

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 07:03
I thought A, but they all seem to follow from the text

Last edited by kevincan on 26 Aug 2006, 10:13, edited 1 time in total.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5222
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2006, 07:44
Oh boy, looks like this one is gonna stay active for awhile. Any other thoughts?? U2Lover, Dahiya, Professor, John, Rudy, you guys wanna chime in?
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 131
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 18:58
i think its E.

_________________

A.P.

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 441
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Using Diplomacy for a Cease Fire [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 20:35
(E) for me :

GMATT73 wrote:
You got 2 minutes. Go!!

Unless negotions begin soon, the cease-fire will be violated by one of the two sides to the dispute. Negotions will be held only if other countries have pressured the two sides to negotiate; an argument will emerge only if other countries continue such pressure throughout the negotions. But no negotiations will be held until international troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated their ability to counter any agression from either side, thus suppressing a major incentive for the two sides to resume fighting.

If the statements above are true, and if negotions between the two sides do begin soon, at the time home negotiations begin each of the folllowing must also be true EXCEPT:

A) The cease-fire has not been violated by either of the two sides
TRUE. Only when troops can enforce the ceasefire will the 2 sides come to the negotiation table.

B) International troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated that they can counter aggression from either of the two sides.
TRUE. One of the preconditions for negotiation.

C) A major incentive for the two sides to resume hostilities has been suppressed.
TRUE. One of the preconditions for negotiation.

D) Other countries have exerted pressure on the two sides to the dispute.
TRUE. Thats the only way they come to the negotiation table.

E) The negotiations' reaching an agreement depends in part on the actions of other countries.
ONLY ONE LEFT.

_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 145
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 20:43
A.

2:05.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 365
Schools: Kellogg School of Management
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 21:17
C ?
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2898
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 21:42
hmm....
looks like A.

If A then B does not mean if NOT(A) then NOT(B)....
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1128
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 22:48
I'm going with A on this.
Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 718
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2006, 23:51
A for me))
Let me try to explain my logic on this
Though i am not good in explanations I ll do my best

Unless negotions begin soon, the cease-fire will be violated by one of the two sides to the dispute. Negotions will be held only if other countries have pressured the two sides to negotiate; an argument will emerge only if other countries continue such pressure throughout the negotions. But no negotiations will be held until international troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated their ability to counter any agression from either side, thus suppressing a major incentive for the two sides to resume fighting.

If the statements above are true, and if negotions between the two sides do begin soon, at the time home negotiations begin each of the folllowing must also be true EXCEPT:

A) The cease-fire has not been violated by either of the two sides

B) International troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated that they can counter aggression from either of the two sides.

C) A major incentive for the two sides to resume hostilities has been suppressed.

D) Other countries have exerted pressure on the two sides to the dispute.

E) The negotiations' reaching an agreement depends in part on the actions of other countries.

In order the negotiations took place several conditions must be fulfilled
1)Negotions will be held only if other countries have pressured the two sides to negotiate
2)international troops enforcing the cease-fire will demonstrate their ability to counter any agression from either side, thus suppressing a major incentive for the two sides to resume fighting

B ,C and D out
an argument will emerge only if other countries continue such pressure throughout the negotions
so E is out
A looks good for me because even if The cease-fire was violated by either of the two sides, there is no mention for this reason to be enought to stop negotiations.
In extreme case the negotiations will be postponed, but still held later on.
Hope this helps
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 402
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2006, 01:12
I believe it is E
Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 718
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2006, 08:29
whats the OA?
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5222
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2006, 08:33
Yurik79 wrote:
A for me))
Let me try to explain my logic on this
Though i am not good in explanations I ll do my best

Unless negotions begin soon, the cease-fire will be violated by one of the two sides to the dispute. Negotions will be held only if other countries have pressured the two sides to negotiate; an argument will emerge only if other countries continue such pressure throughout the negotions. But no negotiations will be held until international troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated their ability to counter any agression from either side, thus suppressing a major incentive for the two sides to resume fighting.

If the statements above are true, and if negotions between the two sides do begin soon, at the time home negotiations begin each of the folllowing must also be true EXCEPT:

A) The cease-fire has not been violated by either of the two sides

B) International troops enforcing the cease-fire have demonstrated that they can counter aggression from either of the two sides.

C) A major incentive for the two sides to resume hostilities has been suppressed.

D) Other countries have exerted pressure on the two sides to the dispute.

E) The negotiations' reaching an agreement depends in part on the actions of other countries.

In order the negotiations took place several conditions must be fulfilled
1)Negotions will be held only if other countries have pressured the two sides to negotiate
2)international troops enforcing the cease-fire will demonstrate their ability to counter any agression from either side, thus suppressing a major incentive for the two sides to resume fighting

B ,C and D out
an argument will emerge only if other countries continue such pressure throughout the negotions
so E is out
A looks good for me because even if The cease-fire was violated by either of the two sides, there is no mention for this reason to be enought to stop negotiations.
In extreme case the negotiations will be postponed, but still held later on.
Hope this helps

OA is A! OE is YURIK!! Way to comrade
VP
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1261
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2006, 08:34
E) The negotiations' reaching an agreement depends in part on the actions of other countries.

Timed @2:30..
28 Aug 2006, 08:34
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The United States will soon begin spot checking all 12 07 May 2010, 05:54
2 You should not praise an act of apparent generosity unless 4 02 Jul 2009, 12:45
Unless they are used as strictly temporary measures, 2 12 Jul 2009, 11:42
Will post OA soon.Wanted to get the opinion of all you good 6 21 Jan 2009, 15:04
A cat will not be affectionate toward people unless it is 4 12 Sep 2007, 12:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# You got 2 minutes. Go!! Unless negotions begin soon, the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.