Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join Our "Master Multi-Source Reasoning Questions by Owning the Dataset” Session! Tackling Multi-Source Reasoning (MSR) on the GMAT can be like navigating through a complex maze.
Earning a 100th percentile score on the GMAT Focus is no easy feat. But with Target Test Prep, any score is possible. Take Ming, a TTP student who recently scored 755 (Q86/V88/DI86) on the GMAT Focus Edition.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
a governor of state X in a speech to a chamber of commerce
[#permalink]
01 Dec 2006, 10:16
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
a governor of state X in a speech to a chamber of commerce in state Y:
"Many businesspoeple in state Y who have never travelled to state X believe that we have inadequate airports. However, these people are mistaken. State X has spent more money per airport on improvement than any other state in the country over the last five years. Because of this, our on-time flight percentage has risen 5 points over the last five years and passenger complaints are down 10 percent over the same time period.
which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermines the reasoning the the governor X's argument ?
A. In the governor's state, spending on airport improvements has been growing more slowly over the last five years than in several other states, including state Y.
B. Business people care more about the quality of hotels in the location they visit than the quality of airports.
C. Over the last five years, many businesses have relocated out of state X, but similar number have relocated into state X.
D. The business taxes in state X are higher than they are in state Y.
E. Only states that have seriously inadequate airports need to spend large sum of money on improving their airports.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: a governor of state X in a speech to a chamber of commerce
[#permalink]
01 Dec 2006, 14:59
OA is E. However, can you explain why it's E and not A?
My reason is that since the governor said they spend the most per airport, it 's still possible that there is only 1 airport in X and so all the money is spent on that airport vs say 10 air ports in Y and thus, the amount per airport in Y is not as high as X. From A, we also know that the growth rate in x is less than that of in Y
Re: a governor of state X in a speech to a chamber of commerce
[#permalink]
01 Dec 2006, 19:15
enola wrote:
OA is E. However, can you explain why it's E and not A?
My reason is that since the governor said they spend the most per airport, it 's still possible that there is only 1 airport in X and so all the money is spent on that airport vs say 10 air ports in Y and thus, the amount per airport in Y is not as high as X. From A, we also know that the growth rate in x is less than that of in Y
Your analysis is aligned to find an "inferenece" from the argument when test writer asks us to find something that weakens the argument. Only E does that by suggesting that X's airports are so bad that even a substancial investment is not good enough and X's airports are yet to catch up with Y's airports in terms of the services they offer.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: a governor of state X in a speech to a chamber of commerce [#permalink]