Last visit was: 18 May 2026, 03:53 It is currently 18 May 2026, 03:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 (Easy)|   Long Passage|   Science|                              
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 4,849
Own Kudos:
9,206
 [3]
Given Kudos: 227
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,849
Kudos: 9,206
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sneha2021
Joined: 20 Dec 2020
Last visit: 10 Jun 2025
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 489
Location: India
Posts: 294
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 16,468
Own Kudos:
79,644
 [3]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,468
Kudos: 79,644
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
samarth1222
Joined: 30 Dec 2021
Last visit: 31 Dec 2024
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Posts: 48
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
Can someone please explain in question 2 why option C is correct and not A and also what is the difference between both of them? Also, 1 other question The questions which we get in RC what is the difficulty level for them because gmat is adaptive so if someone marked the wrong answer for question 5 so will that person get the Q6 same as the person who has marked the right answer for Q5 . or the level of question in the RC passage is same for everyone irrespective of the accuracy of their previous answer.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 7,393
Own Kudos:
70,925
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,137
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,393
Kudos: 70,925
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 2


samarth1222
Hi,
Can someone please explain in question 2 why option C is correct and not A and also what is the difference between both of them? Also, 1 other question The questions which we get in RC what is the difficulty level for them because gmat is adaptive so if someone marked the wrong answer for question 5 so will that person get the Q6 same as the person who has marked the right answer for Q5 . or the level of question in the RC passage is same for everyone irrespective of the accuracy of their previous answer.
Stealing from my previous post: the key to answering primary purpose questions is to understand the purpose of each piece of the passage, and determine how these pieces connect to one another. This passage breaks down nicely into paragraphs, so let's go through each one:

  • Paragraph 1: The author introduces the idea of population cycles, and then states that attempts to determine the driving force behind these cycles have been "unproductive." These attempts focused on several different factors -- predatory birds and parasites, changes in habitat, etc.
  • Paragraph 2: The author introduces another potential "driving force" -- viruses. He/she then explains the mechanisms behind this theory
  • Paragraph 3: The author provides additional support for the theory that viruses are the driving force behind population cycles.

When taken together, it is clear that the author's primary purpose is to introduce and explain the evidence behind a new theory -- the information in the first paragraph is included to provide additional context for the new hypothesis. Let's see how that stacks up against the answer choices in question:
Quote:
(C) present a hypothesis about the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera

Here we go! The "hypothesis" is that viruses are the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera. While the author does discuss other theories, he/she includes these in the passage to provide context for the virus hypothesis -- so we can say that the "primary purpose" of the passage is to present the new hypothesis.

Compared that with (A):
Quote:
(A) describe the development of new techniques that may help to determine the driving force behind population cycles in lepidoptera
The author does mention "new techniques of molecular biology that allow viral DNA to be detected." But he/she really doesn't talk about the development of these new techniques -- we have no idea how these techniques came about. Additionally, the passage is mainly concerned with the hypothesis that came out of the techniques, not the techniques themselves.

Eliminate (A), and (C) is the correct answer to question 2.

Regarding your question about how passages adapt: GMAC doesn't publish exactly how their adaptive algorithm works, but we do know that a single passage often has more questions than you'll see during a test. For example, this passage has 6 questions, but you'd only see 3 or 4 questions for each passage during your verbal section. So, it's likely that you'll see the hardest 4 questions if you're doing really well, and the easiest 4 questions if you've made a lot of RC mistakes previously.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Tanchat
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 20 Jun 2023
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 139
Posts: 215
Kudos: 21
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Experts,

I have a question in Q3

RC00120-02 According to the passage, before the discovery of new techniques for detecting viral DNA, population ecologists believed that viral diseases--

(A) were not widely prevalent among insect populations generally
(B) affected only the caterpillar life stage of lepidoptera
(C) were the driving force behind Lepidoptera population cycles
(D) attacked already declining caterpillar populations
(E) infected birds and parasites that prey on various species of lepidoptera

Why (A) is wrong? and


The passage mentions :
Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus. For many years, viral disease had been reported in declining populations of caterpillars, but population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it.

I cannot eliminate (A) and (B)

From my understanding :
"population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it" could be implied that ecologists typically find the virus when it was underway (or in process of decline). I have no idea and feel it make no sense that virus (C) attacked already declining caterpillar populations.

Could any experts help me eliminate (A) and (C), and explain why (C) is correct?

Thank you in advance :)
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 7,393
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,137
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,393
Kudos: 70,925
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3


Tanchat
Dear Experts,

I have a question in Q3

RC00120-02 According to the passage, before the discovery of new techniques for detecting viral DNA, population ecologists believed that viral diseases--

(A) were not widely prevalent among insect populations generally
(B) affected only the caterpillar life stage of lepidoptera
(C) were the driving force behind Lepidoptera population cycles
(D) attacked already declining caterpillar populations
(E) infected birds and parasites that prey on various species of lepidoptera

Why (A) is wrong? and


The passage mentions :
Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus. For many years, viral disease had been reported in declining populations of caterpillars, but population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it.

I cannot eliminate (A) and (B)

From my understanding :
"population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it" could be implied that ecologists typically find the virus when it was underway (or in process of decline). I have no idea and feel it make no sense that virus (C) attacked already declining caterpillar populations.

Could any experts help me eliminate (A) and (C), and explain why (C) is correct?

Thank you in advance :)
As you point out, the first two sentences in the second paragraph are key for this question:

Quote:
Recent work suggests that this agent may be a virus. For many years, viral disease had been reported in declining populations of caterpillars, but population ecologists had usually considered viral disease to have contributed to the decline once it was underway rather than to have initiated it. The recent work has been made possible by new techniques of molecular biology that allow viral DNA to be detected at low concentrations in the environment.
This tells us that before the discovery of new DNA techniques, ecologists thought the virus contributed to a decline "once it was already underway." Keep in mind that we won't need any outside knowledge for these passages. So even if this fact seems odd, we should assume that ecologists held this belief when tackling the questions.

Let's start with (A):
Quote:
According to the passage, before the discovery of new techniques for detecting viral DNA, population ecologists believed that viral diseases--

(A) were not widely prevalent among insect populations generally
Although the passage discusses how the virus might specifically affect caterpillars, it never talks about the "prevalence" of the virus amongst "insect populations generally." So, since the discussion is limited to the virus's effect on caterpillars, we can discard (A).

Quote:
(B) affected only the caterpillar life stage of lepidopteras
The passage suggests that the virus contributed to the decline of caterpillars. However, it never suggests that ecologists ever thought the virus affected lepidopteras only during the caterpillar stage. Since (B) is out of scope, we can eliminate it.

Quote:
(C) were the driving force behind Lepidoptera population cycles
This is exactly what ecologists hypothesized after the discovery of new DNA techniques. Before this discovery, we know they thought it wasn't the driving force, but that it merely contributed to a decline that was already happening. For that reason, we can get rid of (C).

Quote:
(D) attacked already declining caterpillar populations
The passage tells us that before the discovery of the DNA techniques, ecologists thought the virus contributed to the decline caterpillars populations once the decline was "underway," rather than initiating the decline. So (D) is correct.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 379
Kudos: 96
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dear GMATNinjaTwo, VeritasKarishma, MartyTargetTestPrep, AndrewN,VeritasPrepBrian,GMATRockstar
KarishmaB

avigutman, AndrewN,MartyTargetTestPrep ,

I am struggled with this question,
RC00120-01.
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author???s conclusion in lines 18-22?

(A) New research reveals that the number of species of birds and parasites that prey on lepidoptera has dropped significantly in recent years.
(B) New experiments in which the habitats of lepidoptera are altered in previously untried ways result in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles.
(C) Recent experiments have revealed that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites of lepidoptera.
(D) Differences among the habitats of lepidoptera species make it difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles.
(E) Viral disease is typically observed in a large proportion of the lepidoptera population.

I haven't gotten where my mistakes are.
my reasoning is as following:
the author points out the evidence implies that the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
what the evidence refers to ? obviously, the evidence is mentioned in the earlier part in P1,
Quote:
The common approach of studying causes of population cycles by measuring the mortality caused by different agents, such as predatory birds or parasites, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera. Moreover, population ecologists??? attempts to alter cycles by changing the caterpillars??? habitat and by reducing caterpillar populations have not succeeded.
in other words, predatory birds or parasites are unproductive, which leads to picked up A, A implies the birds or parasites have dropped significantly, so there are insufficient birds or parasites, so if insufficient, even the result is unproductive, it is hard to say birds or parasites are not the driving force. maybe they are the driving force, but they are so few that you cannot get the whether they are driving force or not, so we cannot rule out this potential driving forces, therefore, weaken the conclusion.

and I am also confused by C
if virus are present on birds or parasites, additional the evidence above, you can infer both virus and birds or parasites are not the driving forces.

appreciate your help.
User avatar
idilbayar
Joined: 08 Oct 2022
Last visit: 26 May 2023
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: Turkey
Posts: 15
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear experts,
Can you please explain the correct answer choice for Question 1?
It says, "develop an explanation for the existence of lepidoptera population cycles." What confuses me here is we already know that the mentioned population cycle exists. We are trying to find out why the cycle occurs. Is it appropriate to say, "develop an explanation for the existence of lepidoptera population cycles?"
Thank you so much.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 7,393
Own Kudos:
70,925
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,137
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,393
Kudos: 70,925
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 1



idilbayar
Dear experts,

Can you please explain the correct answer choice for Question 1?

It says, "develop an explanation for the existence of lepidoptera population cycles." What confuses me here is we already know that the mentioned population cycle exists. We are trying to find out why the cycle occurs. Is it appropriate to say, "develop an explanation for the existence of lepidoptera population cycles?"

Thank you so much.
You're right that scientists are looking for why the population cycle occurs. That's exactly what (A) is getting after: "develop an explanation for the existence of lepidoptera population cycles."

While scientists know that the population cycle exists, they still can't explain why it exists. So, they investigated parasites and predatory birds to find that explanation.

(A) is the correct answer for question 1.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 7,393
Own Kudos:
70,925
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,137
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,393
Kudos: 70,925
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 6


zoezhuyan
dear GMATNinjaTwo,

I am struggled with this question,

RC00120-01.
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author???s conclusion in lines 18-22?

(A) New research reveals that the number of species of birds and parasites that prey on lepidoptera has dropped significantly in recent years.

(B) New experiments in which the habitats of lepidoptera are altered in previously untried ways result in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles.

(C) Recent experiments have revealed that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites of lepidoptera.

(D) Differences among the habitats of lepidoptera species make it difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles.

(E) Viral disease is typically observed in a large proportion of the lepidoptera population.

I haven't gotten where my mistakes are.

my reasoning is as following:

the author points out the evidence implies that the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.

what the evidence refers to ? obviously, the evidence is mentioned in the earlier part in P1,

Quote:
The common approach of studying causes of population cycles by measuring the mortality caused by different agents, such as predatory birds or parasites, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera. Moreover, population ecologists??? attempts to alter cycles by changing the caterpillars??? habitat and by reducing caterpillar populations have not succeeded.

in other words, predatory birds or parasites are unproductive, which leads to picked up A, A implies the birds or parasites have dropped significantly, so there are insufficient birds or parasites, so if insufficient, even the result is unproductive, it is hard to say birds or parasites are not the driving force. maybe they are the driving force, but they are so few that you cannot get the whether they are driving force or not, so we cannot rule out this potential driving forces, therefore, weaken the conclusion.

and I am also confused by C

if virus are present on birds or parasites, additional the evidence above, you can infer both virus and birds or parasites are not the driving forces.

appreciate your help.
You raise good points about (A) and (C)! Before we analyze them, let's quickly reiterate the author's conclusion at the end of the first paragraph.

Quote:
In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
As you say, the author supports this conclusion by noting that studies about potential causes (such as predatory birds or parasites) have failed to explain the changes in lepidoptera populations.

Here's (A) again:

Quote:
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s conclusion in lines 18-22?

(A) New research reveals that the number of species of birds and parasites that prey on lepidoptera has dropped significantly in recent years.
Does this cast doubt on the idea that lepidoptera are regulated by an agent other than parasites or predatory birds? The problem is, this doesn't give us very much information. So drawing that conclusion would require a number of leaps. Is it possible that the drop in the number of bird and parasite species has prevented them from regulating lepidoptera? Possibly, but that would require a pretty big assumption, so we can't safely draw that conclusion.

From another angle: even if we did make the above assumption, we don't really know when the studies were carried out. Was it before the drop? After the drop? Again, to draw any conclusions at this point would require us to make unfounded leaps.

So, since (A) doesn't give us enough information to safely draw any useful conclusions, we can eliminate it.

Let's look at (C):

Quote:
Recent experiments have revealed that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites of lepidoptera.
Does this weaken the author's conclusion? Not really. Keep in mind that the author's conclusion in lines 18-22 is NOT that the virus is definitely regulating lepidoptera populations. Instead, the conclusion is that something "more intimately connected to the insect" is regulating lepidoptera. The fact that the virus is present "in a number of predators and parasites" doesn't weaken the idea that something aside from predators or parasites is at play.

For that reason, we can eliminate (C).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
rickyric395
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Last visit: 11 May 2026
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 68
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 123
Kudos: 111
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Quote:
6. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s conclusion in lines 25- 30 (bold lines)?
This question asks us to flex our CR muscles, but let's first take a moment to nail down the structure and purpose of this passage:

  • In paragraph 1, the author explains that a small number of lepidoptera species exhibit population cycles, and states that the driving force behind these cycles is difficult to identify. The author concludes that this driving force may be intimately connected to the insect itself, rather than being connected to the insect's predators or parasites.
  • In paragraph 2, the author presents recent work, which suggests that this driving force (a.k.a. the agent regulating population cycles) may be a virus.
  • In paragraph 3, the author notes that the virus hypothesis is attractive because it seems broadly applicable across different lepidoptera species.

OK, now let's revisit the conclusion being highlighted:

Quote:
In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
The author concludes that whatever is regulating the population cycle is closer to the insect than it is to predatory birds or parasites. Here's how the author reaches this conclusion:

  • Studying predatory birds and parasites, thought to be potential agents, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera.
  • Recent study of viral disease, thanks to new techniques of molecular biology, has identified nuclear polyhedrosis viruses as a more likely agent.
  • Polyhedrosis viruses follow an infectious cycle that is intimately linked to lepidoptera, in which lepidoptera ingest the virus in the form of crystals, incubate new virus particles within their bodies, and release these crystals back into the environment upon dying.

If we're looking to weaken this conclusion, we need an answer choice that either:

  • contradicts what we've read about this link between polyhedrosis viruses and lepidoptera, or
  • delivers evidence that some other regulating agent is even more likely to be the driving force of these population cycles.

Now let's use process of elimination to go through all five choices.

Quote:
(A) New research reveals that the number of species of birds and parasites that prey on lepidoptera has dropped significantly in recent years.
This choice actually strengthens the conclusion, because it adds evidence that other potential agents (predatory birds and parasites) have significantly decreased in number in recent years. This reinforces what the author stated plainly in paragraph 1. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) New experiments in which the habitats of lepidoptera are altered in previously untried ways result in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles.
This choice introduces new evidence that the regulating agent we're all looking for might be intimately linked to the habitats of lepidoptera, after all. Most importantly, this choice tells us that whatever these experiments did to habitats, that action definitely resulted in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles. We'll keep choice (B) because it provides proof that another agent--habitat--can regulate population cycles.

bpdulog
I was down to B and C but went with C since the later part of the line dismisses the relationship with predators and the driving force of the life cycle
Quote:
(C) Recent experiments have revealed that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites of lepidoptera.
Knowing that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites doesn't change anything we've read about the nuclear polyhedrosis virus and its link to lepidoptera. The author's conclusion does not depend on this virus existing only in lepidoptera. And the language of this answer choice doesn't include any dismissal of the intimate link between polyhedrosis viruses and lepidoptera. It simply points out that the virus is also present in predators and parasites of lepidoptera.

(C) doesn't contradict the impact of nuclear polyhedrosis viruses or provide an alternative agent, so we'll eliminate (C).

gauravmarwaha
I could easily eliminate options E, C and A and chose option D over B. Can someone help?
Quote:
(D) Differences among the habitats of lepidoptera species make it difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles.
Choice (D) does identify a potential alternative agent: weather. However, the logical statement made here is quite weak. (D) tells us that it's difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles. So even if it's possible for weather to affect these population cycles, we have no way of confirming whether that effect is actually taking place.

Likewise, I could say, "It's difficult to assess the effects of the lunar cycle on lepidoptera," but this wouldn't make me jump up and say that lunar cycles are likely to be more of a driving force of lepidoptera population cycles than nuclear polyhedrosis viruses. We're not interested in hypothetical effects that are difficult to assess. We're interested in proof that an alternative agent is truly at work. That's why we eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) Viral disease is typically observed in a large proportion of the lepidoptera population.
This choice doesn't affect the conclusion. Much like Choice (C), it tells us a little more about the presence of viral disease in lepidoptera populations, but it doesn't mention polyhedrosis viruses and doesn't provide evidence of any alternative agent regulating population cycles. Eliminate (E).

Whew! This may have taken me an entire population cycle to write. (Yes, more bad Dad jokes. I'm practicing them. There's no "negative kudos" button, so you're stuck with them.) After all of that, (B) is the only choice that presents evidence of a regulating agent that is NOT intimately linked to the insect (instead, the agent is linked to the insect's habitat). So we keep (B) and move on.

I hope this helps!

Hey GMATNinja , Author is concluding that there is some other agent that is affecting insect's population more than birds and parasite. So a possible weakener would be to show that birds and parasites are indeed on same or greater level than this other agent. Please let me know if I am right? If I am, then wouldn't option B weaken the idea behind this weakener thereby strengthening it?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 7,393
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,137
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,393
Kudos: 70,925
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rickyric395
GMATNinja
Quote:
6. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s conclusion in lines 25- 30 (bold lines)?
This question asks us to flex our CR muscles, but let's first take a moment to nail down the structure and purpose of this passage:

    [] In paragraph 1, the author explains that a small number of lepidoptera species exhibit population cycles, and states that the driving force behind these cycles is difficult to identify. The author concludes that this driving force may be intimately connected to the insect itself, rather than being connected to the insect's predators or parasites.
    [] In paragraph 2, the author presents recent work, which suggests that this driving force (a.k.a. the agent regulating population cycles) may be a virus.
  • In paragraph 3, the author notes that the virus hypothesis is attractive because it seems broadly applicable across different lepidoptera species.

OK, now let's revisit the conclusion being highlighted:

Quote:
In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
The author concludes that whatever is regulating the population cycle is closer to the insect than it is to predatory birds or parasites. Here's how the author reaches this conclusion:

    [] Studying predatory birds and parasites, thought to be potential agents, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera.
    [] Recent study of viral disease, thanks to new techniques of molecular biology, has identified nuclear polyhedrosis viruses as a more likely agent.
  • Polyhedrosis viruses follow an infectious cycle that is intimately linked to lepidoptera, in which lepidoptera ingest the virus in the form of crystals, incubate new virus particles within their bodies, and release these crystals back into the environment upon dying.

If we're looking to weaken this conclusion, we need an answer choice that either:

    []contradicts what we've read about this link between polyhedrosis viruses and lepidoptera, or
    []delivers evidence that some other regulating agent is even more likely to be the driving force of these population cycles.

Now let's use process of elimination to go through all five choices.

Quote:
New research reveals that the number of species of birds and parasites that prey on lepidoptera has dropped significantly in recent years.
This choice actually strengthens the conclusion, because it adds evidence that other potential agents (predatory birds and parasites) have significantly decreased in number in recent years. This reinforces what the author stated plainly in paragraph 1. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
New experiments in which the habitats of lepidoptera are altered in previously untried ways result in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles.
This choice introduces new evidence that the regulating agent we're all looking for might be intimately linked to the habitats of lepidoptera, after all. Most importantly, this choice tells us that whatever these experiments did to habitats, that action definitely resulted in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles. We'll keep choice (B) because it provides proof that another agent--habitat--can regulate population cycles.

bpdulog
I was down to B and C but went with C since the later part of the line dismisses the relationship with predators and the driving force of the life cycle
Quote:
Recent experiments have revealed that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites of lepidoptera.
Knowing that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites doesn't change anything we've read about the nuclear polyhedrosis virus and its link to lepidoptera. The author's conclusion does not depend on this virus existing only in lepidoptera. And the language of this answer choice doesn't include any dismissal of the intimate link between polyhedrosis viruses and lepidoptera. It simply points out that the virus is also present in predators and parasites of lepidoptera.

(C) doesn't contradict the impact of nuclear polyhedrosis viruses or provide an alternative agent, so we'll eliminate (C).

gauravmarwaha
I could easily eliminate options E, C and A and chose option D over B. Can someone help?
Quote:
Differences among the habitats of lepidoptera species make it difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles.
Choice (D) does identify a potential alternative agent: weather. However, the logical statement made here is quite weak. (D) tells us that it's difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles. So even if it's possible for weather to affect these population cycles, we have no way of confirming whether that effect is actually taking place.

Likewise, I could say, "It's difficult to assess the effects of the lunar cycle on lepidoptera," but this wouldn't make me jump up and say that lunar cycles are likely to be more of a driving force of lepidoptera population cycles than nuclear polyhedrosis viruses. We're not interested in hypothetical effects that are difficult to assess. We're interested in proof that an alternative agent is truly at work. That's why we eliminate (D).

Quote:
Viral disease is typically observed in a large proportion of the lepidoptera population.
This choice doesn't affect the conclusion. Much like Choice (C), it tells us a little more about the presence of viral disease in lepidoptera populations, but it doesn't mention polyhedrosis viruses and doesn't provide evidence of any alternative agent regulating population cycles. Eliminate (E).

Whew! This may have taken me an entire population cycle to write. (Yes, more bad Dad jokes. I'm practicing them. There's no "negative kudos" button, so you're stuck with them.) After all of that, (B) is the only choice that presents evidence of a regulating agent that is NOT intimately linked to the insect (instead, the agent is linked to the insect's habitat). So we keep (B) and move on.

I hope this helps!

Hey [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D , Author is concluding that there is some other agent that is affecting insect's population more than birds and parasite. So a possible weakener would be to show that birds and parasites are indeed on same or greater level than this other agent. Please let me know if I am right? If I am, then wouldn't option B weaken the idea behind this weakener thereby strengthening it?
Be careful about altering the author's language! The author isn't just saying there's "some other agent." She's saying that the population may be regulated "by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites." What might be "more intimately connected"? Maybe something inside the insect's cells. Like a virus!

So you're right that (B) is introducing the possibility of there being another agent, but because this agent is introduced by altering the habitat, it doesn't sound as though this other agent is more intimately connected to the insect. In other words, it's more likely that it's the altered habit that's influencing the life cycle. Not the “intimately connected” virus.

So that "intimately connected" phrase is doing some pretty heavy lifting here. Without it, you’d be right. But it’s here, and it’s important.

I hope that clears things up!
User avatar
Tanisha2819
Joined: 29 Apr 2022
Last visit: 23 Jun 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 14
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
Quote:
6. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s conclusion in lines 25- 30 (bold lines)?
This question asks us to flex our CR muscles, but let's first take a moment to nail down the structure and purpose of this passage:

  • In paragraph 1, the author explains that a small number of lepidoptera species exhibit population cycles, and states that the driving force behind these cycles is difficult to identify. The author concludes that this driving force may be intimately connected to the insect itself, rather than being connected to the insect's predators or parasites.
  • In paragraph 2, the author presents recent work, which suggests that this driving force (a.k.a. the agent regulating population cycles) may be a virus.
  • In paragraph 3, the author notes that the virus hypothesis is attractive because it seems broadly applicable across different lepidoptera species.

OK, now let's revisit the conclusion being highlighted:

Quote:
In short, the evidence implies that these insect populations, if not self-regulating, may at least be regulated by an agent more intimately connected with the insect than are predatory birds or parasites.
The author concludes that whatever is regulating the population cycle is closer to the insect than it is to predatory birds or parasites. Here's how the author reaches this conclusion:

  • Studying predatory birds and parasites, thought to be potential agents, has been unproductive in the case of lepidoptera.
  • Recent study of viral disease, thanks to new techniques of molecular biology, has identified nuclear polyhedrosis viruses as a more likely agent.
  • Polyhedrosis viruses follow an infectious cycle that is intimately linked to lepidoptera, in which lepidoptera ingest the virus in the form of crystals, incubate new virus particles within their bodies, and release these crystals back into the environment upon dying.

If we're looking to weaken this conclusion, we need an answer choice that either:

  • contradicts what we've read about this link between polyhedrosis viruses and lepidoptera, or
  • delivers evidence that some other regulating agent is even more likely to be the driving force of these population cycles.

Now let's use process of elimination to go through all five choices.

Quote:
(A) New research reveals that the number of species of birds and parasites that prey on lepidoptera has dropped significantly in recent years.
This choice actually strengthens the conclusion, because it adds evidence that other potential agents (predatory birds and parasites) have significantly decreased in number in recent years. This reinforces what the author stated plainly in paragraph 1. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) New experiments in which the habitats of lepidoptera are altered in previously untried ways result in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles.
This choice introduces new evidence that the regulating agent we're all looking for might be intimately linked to the habitats of lepidoptera, after all. Most importantly, this choice tells us that whatever these experiments did to habitats, that action definitely resulted in the shortening of lepidoptera population cycles. We'll keep choice (B) because it provides proof that another agent--habitat--can regulate population cycles.

bpdulog
I was down to B and C but went with C since the later part of the line dismisses the relationship with predators and the driving force of the life cycle
Quote:
(C) Recent experiments have revealed that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites of lepidoptera.
Knowing that the nuclear polyhedrosis virus is present in a number of predators and parasites doesn't change anything we've read about the nuclear polyhedrosis virus and its link to lepidoptera. The author's conclusion does not depend on this virus existing only in lepidoptera. And the language of this answer choice doesn't include any dismissal of the intimate link between polyhedrosis viruses and lepidoptera. It simply points out that the virus is also present in predators and parasites of lepidoptera.

(C) doesn't contradict the impact of nuclear polyhedrosis viruses or provide an alternative agent, so we'll eliminate (C).

gauravmarwaha
I could easily eliminate options E, C and A and chose option D over B. Can someone help?
Quote:
(D) Differences among the habitats of lepidoptera species make it difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles.
Choice (D) does identify a potential alternative agent: weather. However, the logical statement made here is quite weak. (D) tells us that it's difficult to assess the effects of weather on lepidoptera population cycles. So even if it's possible for weather to affect these population cycles, we have no way of confirming whether that effect is actually taking place.

Likewise, I could say, "It's difficult to assess the effects of the lunar cycle on lepidoptera," but this wouldn't make me jump up and say that lunar cycles are likely to be more of a driving force of lepidoptera population cycles than nuclear polyhedrosis viruses. We're not interested in hypothetical effects that are difficult to assess. We're interested in proof that an alternative agent is truly at work. That's why we eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) Viral disease is typically observed in a large proportion of the lepidoptera population.
This choice doesn't affect the conclusion. Much like Choice (C), it tells us a little more about the presence of viral disease in lepidoptera populations, but it doesn't mention polyhedrosis viruses and doesn't provide evidence of any alternative agent regulating population cycles. Eliminate (E).

Whew! This may have taken me an entire population cycle to write. (Yes, more bad Dad jokes. I'm practicing them. There's no "negative kudos" button, so you're stuck with them.) After all of that, (B) is the only choice that presents evidence of a regulating agent that is NOT intimately linked to the insect (instead, the agent is linked to the insect's habitat). So we keep (B) and move on.

I hope this helps!


Hello GMATNinja

Really amazing explanation with so much detail. Thank you for such amazing answers which help us understand

My doubt here pertains to choice C. The author gives the highlighted conclusion at the end of the first paragraph that there might be some other agent more closely related to the insect than the predatory birds or parasites. Till this point author has not considered the possibility of the Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses so IMO while looking for points to weaken this conclusion, we need not to consider anything in particular about this virus because the same information has not been presented yet and author doesn't use this information to arrive at this conclusion, That is the reason I rejected Option C.

If there were any other option which said that the Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses don't have that much affect on the population cycle of lepidoptera, I would have rejected the same on this ground since author's conclusion is primarily concerned with some agent which is intimately connected with the insect and author till this point doesn't say that agent has to be Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses in particular. Even if an option choice said that Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses don't affect the population cycle that much there could very well be a possibility of some other agent affecting their population cycle which is intimately connected with the insect and thus such a choice won't weaken the conclusion.

So a possible weakener here should be either a statement telling us that something else not so intimately connected with the insect affects their population cycle or a statement which shows us that its impossible for any agent intimately connected with the insect to affect their population cycle.

I don't think that we should consider the information given in the subsequent passage after the conclusion has been made to weaken the conclusion.

Please tell me if my understanding is correct or not. Will wait for your reply.
Thank you
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 May 2026
Posts: 7,393
Own Kudos:
70,925
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,137
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,393
Kudos: 70,925
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tanisha2819
Hello GMATNinja

Really amazing explanation with so much detail. Thank you for such amazing answers which help us understand

My doubt here pertains to choice C. The author gives the highlighted conclusion at the end of the first paragraph that there might be some other agent more closely related to the insect than the predatory birds or parasites. Till this point author has not considered the possibility of the Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses so IMO while looking for points to weaken this conclusion, we need not to consider anything in particular about this virus because the same information has not been presented yet and author doesn't use this information to arrive at this conclusion, That is the reason I rejected Option C.

If there were any other option which said that the Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses don't have that much affect on the population cycle of lepidoptera, I would have rejected the same on this ground since author's conclusion is primarily concerned with some agent which is intimately connected with the insect and author till this point doesn't say that agent has to be Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses in particular. Even if an option choice said that Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses don't affect the population cycle that much there could very well be a possibility of some other agent affecting their population cycle which is intimately connected with the insect and thus such a choice won't weaken the conclusion.

So a possible weakener here should be either a statement telling us that something else not so intimately connected with the insect affects their population cycle or a statement which shows us that its impossible for any agent intimately connected with the insect to affect their population cycle.

I don't think that we should consider the information given in the subsequent passage after the conclusion has been made to weaken the conclusion.

Please tell me if my understanding is correct or not. Will wait for your reply.

Thank you
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner!

It sounds like you have the right idea in this case, but you don't want to be too rigid about disregarding stuff from later in the passage. Who knows, maybe there's SOMETHING about nuclear polyhedrosis virus that impacts the evidence described earlier in the passage. If so, that would be a valid answer, even though the author doesn't bring up the virus until later.

In short, you can eliminate (C) because it doesn't weaken the conclusion, not just because it fails on a technicality. ;)

I hope that helps!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,426
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,426
Kudos: 1,012
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
575 posts
11 posts