ChiGMAT wrote:
Although the initial setup of generators and a power grid by Edison and JP Morgan was rather costly, the electrification of lighting in lower Manhattan doubled work efficiency when the energy costs were cut in half.
(A) the electrification of lighting in lower Manhattan doubled work efficiency when the energy costs were cut in half
(B) the electrification of lighting in lower Manhattan doubled work efficiency while cutting energy costs in half
(C) the electrification of lighting in lower Manhattan doubled work efficiency while costs were cut to half
(D) lighting electrification in lower Manhattan doubled work efficiency while energy costs were cut in half
(E) lighting electrification in lower Manhattan doubled work efficiency while costs were cut to half
I didn't understand how Option B is parallel. Subject is ''electrification of lighting'' first verb is ''doubled'', where is the second verb after ''while'' for the common subject ''electrification''? Is ''cutting'' a verb? It sounds awkward to me when I read ''electrification of lighting cutting energy costs in half'', how is that a verb? Shouldn't it be 'cut'' and not ''cutting''?
Thus, I selected Option C even though it uses passive construction.
Also, I have heard in some posts that ''while'',''whereas'',''although'' should also be followed by a clause. I don't see that in Option B. If experts can comment on this, it would be helpful.
Thank You
Vighnesh