Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2013, 05:22

2

This post received KUDOS

7

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (02:51) correct
55% (01:41) wrong based on 187 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinct costs last year and resold all three of those cabinets for three distinct prices this year. If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount, and the antiques dealer made a 10% profit on that cabinet, did the dealer make more than a 10% profit margin on any one of the three cabinet sales?

(1) One of the cabinets sold for a price less than its original cost. (2) The cabinet that sold for the lowest price was the one that cost the antiques dealer the most to purchase.

Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.

_________________

Don't give up on yourself ever. Period. Beat it, no one wants to be defeated (My journey from 570 to 690): http://gmatclub.com/forum/beat-it-no-one-wants-to-be-defeated-journey-570-to-149968.html

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2013, 09:08

1

This post received KUDOS

From the question we get:

Median Price - Median Cost = 10 % Margin

(1) Is not sufficient, since it doesn't tell is whether the cabinet with the highest or lowest price was sold for a price less than the original cost (2) We get the information that, the cabinet sold for the lowest price had the highest cost. Hence the one with the highest Price must have had the lowest cost, so that together with the original statement we can conclude that:

Highest Price - Lowest Cost > 10% Margin , because the cabinet with the median price and median cost already had a 10% margin.

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Feb 2014, 06:58

1

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

daviesj wrote:

An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinct costs last year and resold all three of those cabinets for three distinct prices this year. If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount, and the antiques dealer made a 10% profit on that cabinet, did the dealer make more than a 10% profit margin on any one of the three cabinet sales?

(1) One of the cabinets sold for a price less than its original cost. (2) The cabinet that sold for the lowest price was the one that cost the antiques dealer the most to purchase.

This was a bit hard to get at first but let's see. We are told that we have three cabinets and that the median price - median cost equals a 10% profit. Let's assume that median price is 11 and median cost is 10.

Statement 1 tells us that one of the cabinets sold for a price less than its cost. Let's assume that the highest price that paid by this cabinet was 18 and the cost 20 so of course he made a loss. But still the price of the remaining cabinet is less than 11 while the cost less than 10 and it is still possible to get a margin higher than 10% or lower (Eg. If price is 10 and cost is 1).

Insufficient

Statement 2 tells us that the cabinet with the highest cost also had the lowest price. Therefore if it had a cost higher than 10 and a price lower than 11 then obviously he lost some money again. But this means that the highest price is greater than 11 while the lowest cost is lower than 10, so we know that our profit margin >10%. Therefore this statement is sufficient

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Jan 2013, 04:14

daviesj wrote:

An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinct costs last year and resold all three of those cabinets for three distinct prices this year. If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount, and the antiques dealer made a 10% profit on that cabinet, did the dealer make more than a 10% profit margin on any one of the three cabinet sales?

(1) One of the cabinets sold for a price less than its original cost. (2) The cabinet that sold for the lowest price was the one that cost the antiques dealer the most to purchase.

Hi,

Let C1,C2 and C3 be the Cost Price (CP increasing in that order) and S1,S2 and S3 are the Selling Price (SP increasing in that order)

Now given, (S2-C2)/C2*100= 10 % Profit Margin

From St1, We can have 2 cases i.e S1<C1 or S3<C3. But we don't know which one and we can only conclude on at least on one of these sale there will be a loss

From St 2, we get S1 was the Selling price of One Antique (Let it be Antique no 1) and C3 was the Cost Price

Now Imagine a case where the Selling price is same in all cases i.e S1=S2=S3=S

therefore, we have

C1<C2<C3 and

S1</ S2</ S3---->S1-C3<S2-C2< S3-C1---> S-C3<S-C2<S-C1---->Divide Eqn by C1 we get (S-C3)/C1<(S-C2)/C1<(S-C1)/C1-----> (S-C3)/C1 <(S-C2)/C1<(S/C1-1)

Now (S-C2)/C2*100=10% this implies (S-C2)/C1*100> (S-C2)/C2*100 (Because C2>C1)

and therefore (S/C1-1) is greater than 10% and Hence Ans B

It looked tedious but wanted to arrive at the solution. I have taken the Selling price same for all is to get at minimum values of S and if at that minimum value if we can get a profit margin more than 10% then it will be also applicable for S1<S2<S3

Thanks Mridul
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Apr 2014, 09:14

I am not able to understand why stmt 1 is not sufficient: "If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount" It is given that received price is median of other two sales price: a fixed amount i.e. 10% ++ of median cost of that cabinet.

For statement one: Cost price = 49 50 51 Sales price = X 55 Z (55=10% of 50) Case 1: X = 49-1 = 48 then Y=62 (above 10% of 51+51) (48+62)/2 = 55 Case 2: X = 49-48=1 then Y=109 (above 10% of 51+51) (1+109)/2 = 55 Case 3: Z = 50 then X=60 (above 10% of 49+49) (50+60)/2 = 55 Case 4: Z= 1 then X=109 ( above 10% of 49+49) (1+109)/2 = 55

In all above cases to balance the prices with the median we will have to make adjustment in the sell price and that adjusted price is coming above 10% for particular cabinet.. as mentioned above...

Either I was not able to pick good numbers or A is also sufficient..

Kindly help to verify my solution.
_________________

Piyush K ----------------------- Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison Don't forget to press--> Kudos My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use?| 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New) Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Apr 2014, 11:17

PiyushK wrote:

I am not able to understand why stmt 1 is not sufficient: "If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount" It is given that received price is median of other two sales price: a fixed amount i.e. 10% ++ of median cost of that cabinet.

For statement one: Cost price = 49 50 51 Sales price = X 55 Z (55=10% of 50) Case 1: X = 49-1 = 48 then Y=62 (above 10% of 51+51) (48+62)/2 = 55 Case 2: X = 49-48=1 then Y=109 (above 10% of 51+51) (1+109)/2 = 55 Case 3: Z = 50 then X=60 (above 10% of 49+49) (50+60)/2 = 55 Case 4: Z= 1 then X=109 ( above 10% of 49+49) (1+109)/2 = 55

In all above cases to balance the prices with the median we will have to make adjustment in the sell price and that adjusted price is coming above 10% for particular cabinet.. as mentioned above...

Either I was not able to pick good numbers or A is also sufficient..

Kindly help to verify my solution.

I too am with you on this one... If a median number is increased by x% the corresponding numbers have to increase by X% to maintain the new number as a median.. So the third price has to increase by more than 10% to compensate for - 10% median increase + decreased rate at which the second case was sold.. So A satisfies too... Btw rejected it at the first look..
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Apr 2014, 11:18

JusTLucK04 wrote:

I too am with you on this one... If a median number is increased by x% the corresponding numbers have to increase by X% to maintain the new number as a median.. So the third price has to increase by more than 10% to compensate for - 10% median increase + decreased rate at which the second case was sold.. So A satisfies too... Btw rejected it at the first look..

Let us PM some expert to help on this
_________________

Piyush K ----------------------- Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison Don't forget to press--> Kudos My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use?| 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New) Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinct costs last year and resold all three of those cabinets for three distinct prices this year. If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount, and the antiques dealer made a 10% profit on that cabinet, did the dealer make more than a 10% profit margin on any one of the three cabinet sales?

(1) One of the cabinets sold for a price less than its original cost. (2) The cabinet that sold for the lowest price was the one that cost the antiques dealer the most to purchase.

I am not able to understand why stmt 1 is not sufficient: "If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount" It is given that received price is median of other two sales price: a fixed amount i.e. 10% ++ of median cost of that cabinet.

For statement one: Cost price = 49 50 51 Sales price = X 55 Z (55=10% of 50) Case 1: X = 49-1 = 48 then Y=62 (above 10% of 51+51) (48+62)/2 = 55 Case 2: X = 49-48=1 then Y=109 (above 10% of 51+51) (1+109)/2 = 55 Case 3: Z = 50 then X=60 (above 10% of 49+49) (50+60)/2 = 55 Case 4: Z= 1 then X=109 ( above 10% of 49+49) (1+109)/2 = 55

In all above cases to balance the prices with the median we will have to make adjustment in the sell price and that adjusted price is coming above 10% for particular cabinet.. as mentioned above...

Either I was not able to pick good numbers or A is also sufficient..

Kindly help to verify my solution.

No, the first statement is not sufficient. Consider the cases below:

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Apr 2014, 05:13

Bunuel wrote:

PiyushK wrote:

An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinct costs last year and resold all three of those cabinets for three distinct prices this year. If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount, and the antiques dealer made a 10% profit on that cabinet, did the dealer make more than a 10% profit margin on any one of the three cabinet sales?

(1) One of the cabinets sold for a price less than its original cost. (2) The cabinet that sold for the lowest price was the one that cost the antiques dealer the most to purchase.

I am not able to understand why stmt 1 is not sufficient: "If the median price was received for the cabinet that had cost the median amount" It is given that received price is median of other two sales price: a fixed amount i.e. 10% ++ of median cost of that cabinet.

For statement one: Cost price = 49 50 51 Sales price = X 55 Z (55=10% of 50) Case 1: X = 49-1 = 48 then Y=62 (above 10% of 51+51) (48+62)/2 = 55 Case 2: X = 49-48=1 then Y=109 (above 10% of 51+51) (1+109)/2 = 55 Case 3: Z = 50 then X=60 (above 10% of 49+49) (50+60)/2 = 55 Case 4: Z= 1 then X=109 ( above 10% of 49+49) (1+109)/2 = 55

In all above cases to balance the prices with the median we will have to make adjustment in the sell price and that adjusted price is coming above 10% for particular cabinet.. as mentioned above...

Either I was not able to pick good numbers or A is also sufficient..

Kindly help to verify my solution.

No, the first statement is not sufficient. Consider the cases below:

Attachment:

Untitled.png

Hope it helps.

Thanks Bunuel, now I am able to identify the error: I was considering median=mean, a silly mistake.
_________________

Piyush K ----------------------- Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison Don't forget to press--> Kudos My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use?| 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New) Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Apr 2015, 07:04

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: An antiques dealer purchased three cabinets at three distinc [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 May 2016, 05:50

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Spending two weeks in States, travelling coast to coast, visiting all the exceptional B-Schools. It reinvigorated the desire to go all in this MBA process. Before visiting Haas (...

Military MBA Acceptance Rate Analysis Transitioning from the military to MBA is a fairly popular path to follow. A little over 4% of MBA applications come from military veterans...

Marty Cagan is founding partner of the Silicon Valley Product Group, a consulting firm that helps companies with their product strategy. Prior to that he held product roles at...