Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:14 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
prasannar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Last visit: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 352
Own Kudos:
4,005
 [51]
Posts: 352
Kudos: 4,005
 [51]
Kudos
Add Kudos
51
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
bsd_lover
Joined: 17 May 2007
Last visit: 15 Mar 2020
Posts: 2,432
Own Kudos:
1,735
 [9]
Given Kudos: 210
Posts: 2,432
Kudos: 1,735
 [9]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
Superhuman
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Last visit: 07 May 2008
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
367
 [2]
Posts: 8
Kudos: 367
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 858
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 858
Kudos: 7,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prasannar
Balzac drank more than fifty cups of coffee a day and died of caffeine poisoning; furthermore, caffeine did not seem to bother Samuel Johnson, the great writer and lexicographer, who was reported to have drunk twenty-five cups of tea at one sitting.

(A) furthermore, caffeine did not seem to bother
(B) however, caffeine did not seem to bother
(C) however, caffeine did not seem to have bothered
(D) furthermore, caffeine did not seem to have bothered
(E) in addition, caffeine did not seem to bother

Can anybody figure out what problem with "have bothered" in C? it is wrong grammar rule or change the meanning of the origin, if so please what it change? :lol: Thanks!
User avatar
seekmba
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Last visit: 25 Sep 2014
Posts: 626
Own Kudos:
3,603
 [3]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 626
Kudos: 3,603
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The below explanation should help.

Quote:
There's a slight, very subtle difference in rhetorical meaning here, too: 'didn't seem to bother' reflects the views of a hypothetical observer who was actually there at the time of the mass caffeine ingestion, whereas 'didn't seem to have bothered' reflects the views of a hypothetical observer who took notes after the fact.

here's an analogy:

* if i'm looking at my table right now, i might say
there does not seem to be a knife in this setting.

* if i'm looking at a picture of a table setting from the past, i might say
there does not seem to have been a knife in this setting.
note:
- "does not seem" is in the present tense (since this is in my view - i'm an observer in the present)
- "to have bothered" shifts the focus to the time at which the table was set (a previous timeframe).

* if i'm talking about the situation in the picture - but from the narrative standpoint of an observer at that time - i'd say
there did not seem to be a knife in this setting.
- note that this is the same as the first example, but shifted into the past tense (since the observation was made in the past this time).

i can't shift the second sentence in the past - there did not seem to have been..., unless a past observer is observing a situation even farther in the past.
same goes for (c) in the problem at the beginning of this thread.
User avatar
vikram4689
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Last visit: 26 Feb 2014
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is difference in meaning conveyed by B and C.
B talks about past tense i.e. caffeine did not seem to bother Samuel. We know the caffeine did not bother him till some time in past but we do not know about his condition in present.

Before looking at C lets see - "does not seem to have bothered", this construction indicates that till present caffeine has not bothered Samuel.
C "did not seem to have bothered" is incorrect because "did" indicates past tense and "have bothered" indicates "present perfect" which are incompatible.
User avatar
GyanOne
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,222
Own Kudos:
1,690
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,222
Kudos: 1,690
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
There is difference in meaning conveyed by B and C.
B talks about past tense i.e. caffeine did not seem to bother Samuel. We know the caffeine did not bother him till some time in past but we do not know about his condition in present.

I am afraid that is incorrect. The construction 'did not seem to bother' is indeed different in meaning from the construction 'does not seem to have bothered'. However, the difference is that 'did not seem to bother' indicates that the observation that the caffeine did not bother Johnson was made in the past. The construction 'does not seem to have bothered' indicates that the observation that caffeine did not bother Johnson has been made in the present.

The two constructions have nothing to do with whether caffeine bothered Johnson only in the past or continues to bother him till the present. If the writer wished to distinguish between whether the caffeine affected Johnson or not, the right constructions would be 'however, caffeine did not bother.....' or 'however, caffeine has not bothered.....'. In the second case, the rest of the sentence too will need to be changed to the present tense.
User avatar
vikram4689
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Last visit: 26 Feb 2014
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GyanOne
Quote:
There is difference in meaning conveyed by B and C.
B talks about past tense i.e. caffeine did not seem to bother Samuel. We know the caffeine did not bother him till some time in past but we do not know about his condition in present.

I am afraid that is incorrect. The construction 'did not seem to bother' is indeed different in meaning from the construction 'does not seem to have bothered'. However, the difference is that 'did not seem to bother' indicates that the observation that the caffeine did not bother Johnson was made in the past. The construction 'does not seem to have bothered' indicates that the observation that caffeine did not bother Johnson has been made in the present.

The two constructions have nothing to do with whether caffeine bothered Johnson only in the past or continues to bother him till the present. If the writer wished to distinguish between whether the caffeine affected Johnson or not, the right constructions would be 'however, caffeine did not bother.....' or 'however, caffeine has not bothered.....'. In the second case, the rest of the sentence too will need to be changed to the present tense.

I think i didn't express my emotions clearly. I meant exactly the same. When i said that "We know the caffeine did not bother him till some time in past but we do not know about his condition in present" i meant that statement was made in past and would account for effects till then.
User avatar
GyanOne
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,222
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,222
Kudos: 1,690
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
I think i didn't express my emotions clearly. I meant exactly the same. When i said that "We know the caffeine did not bother him till some time in past but we do not know about his condition in present" i meant that statement was made in past and would account for effects till then.

No worries - it's important to note the placement of the verbs to decide how the meaning changes. In this case, it is the observation that was made in the past (or present, as the case may be).
avatar
Rohit23
Joined: 13 Dec 2018
Last visit: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GPA: 3.94
Posts: 37
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is contrast in the meaning- Balzac was affected by caffeine while Samuel was not. Hence ‘furthermore’ or ‘in addition’ are not the correct terms as they don’t suggest contrast. Hence, A,D, and E can be eliminated.
C can be eliminated for awkward usage of “have bothered”.
Hence, B is the answer.
User avatar
AliciaSierra
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 747
Own Kudos:
642
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,350
Products:
Posts: 747
Kudos: 642
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would like to share a very important construction which I learnt from RonPurewal's Post. Below is analogy which he presented here https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t8269.html

* if i'm looking at my table right now, i might say
there does not seem to be a knife in this setting.

* if i'm looking at a picture of a table setting from the past, i might say
there does not seem to have been a knife in this setting.
note:
- "does not seem" is in the present tense (since this is in my view - i'm an observer in the present)
- "to have bothered" shifts the focus to the time at which the table was set (a previous timeframe).

* if i'm talking about the situation in the picture - but from the narrative standpoint of an observer at that time - i'd say
there did not seem to be a knife in this setting.
- note that this is the same as the first example, but shifted into the past tense (since the observation was made in the past this time).

i can't shift the second sentence in the past - there did not seem to have been..., unless a past observer is observing a situation even farther in the past.
same goes for (c) in the problem at the beginning of this thread.
User avatar
Basshead
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2024
Posts: 925
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 432
Location: United States
Posts: 925
Kudos: 301
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need contrast -- A, D, and E are quickly eliminated. Between B and C, B is the better choice -- there is no need to use the present perfect tense here.


(A) furthermore, caffeine did not seem to bother

(B) however, caffeine did not seem to bother

(C) however, caffeine did not seem to have bothered

(D) furthermore, caffeine did not seem to have bothered

(E) in addition, caffeine did not seem to bother
avatar
brianmontanaweb
Joined: 06 Apr 2022
Last visit: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 113
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prasannar
Balzac drank more than fifty cups of coffee a day and died of caffeine poisoning; furthermore, caffeine did not seem to bother Samuel Johnson, the great writer and lexicographer, who was reported to have drunk twenty-five cups of tea at one sitting.


(A) furthermore, caffeine did not seem to bother

(B) however, caffeine did not seem to bother

(C) however, caffeine did not seem to have bothered

(D) furthermore, caffeine did not seem to have bothered

(E) in addition, caffeine did not seem to bother

A, D, and E can be eliminated since they don't use a comparison connector.

C can be eliminated since the option incorrectly uses "have bothered"

B correctly uses "however", and the idiom "seem to bother"
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts