Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 19:12 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 19:12

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Status:I will be back!
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [16]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 53
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [6]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 473 [3]
Given Kudos: 48
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 446 [1]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: United States (NC)
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hi Moderators, Bunuel

Can you edit the post with the question and answer choices

Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages. Last year, however, one candidate produced a half-hour-long advertisement. At the beginning of the half-hour slot a substantial portion of the viewing public had tuned into that station. Clearly, then, many more people are interested in lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A)The candidate who produced the half-hour-long advertisement did not win election at the polls.
(B)The half-hour-long advertisement was widely publicized before it was broadcast.
(C) The half-hour-long advertisement was aired during a time slot normally taken by one of the most popular prime-time shows.
(D)Most short political advertisements are aired during a wide range of programs in order to reach abroad spectrum of viewers
(E)In general a regular -length television program that features debate about current political issues depends for its appeal on the personal qualities of the program’s moderator.

Would be helpful for community members.
Probus
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2012
Status:I will be back!
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
Ok now I got it. Thank you dchow23 and kraizada84. +1
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 76 [0]
Given Kudos: 65
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
Hey shadabkhaniet,

Basically we have the following

Since many people tuned in at the beginning of a lengthy political commercial ----> people's interest in lengthy commercials is there (or people now have interest in long political commercials)

C provides an alternate cause for why people tuned in to that program. Hence, it weakens the argument.

Good luck.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
IMO C........

Tricky one...... thought b was best answer....but it should be C.........as b still means ppl are interested in long ad.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2014
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 83 [0]
Given Kudos: 113
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 580 Q49 V21
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
Option C , provides an alternative reason, why many people area watching it.

Therefore the answer is Option C.
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
Imo C
IF viewers are not aware about the change in the program timing and if that program is very popular like Game of Thrones people are going to tune in to that slot.But to their surprise they find a half hour long political message , people are surely going to switch the TV as soon as they see it . :-D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 259
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [0]
Given Kudos: 932
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
IMO C for obvious reasons - it says quite clearly that the message aired during an empty prime time TV show slot --> so inadvertently people watched it.
Can this question be posted properly - that is, without the picture? Some of the words are missing on the right.
Thank you!
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618606 [0]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Probus wrote:
Hi Moderators, Bunuel

Can you edit the post with the question and answer choices

Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages. Last year, however, one candidate produced a half-hour-long advertisement. At the beginning of the half-hour slot a substantial portion of the viewing public had tuned into that station. Clearly, then, many more people are interested in lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A)The candidate who produced the half-hour-long advertisement did not win election at the polls.
(B)The half-hour-long advertisement was widely publicized before it was broadcast.
(C) The half-hour-long advertisement was aired during a time slot normally taken by one of the most popular prime-time shows.
(D)Most short political advertisements are aired during a wide range of programs in order to reach abroad spectrum of viewers
(E)In general a regular -length television program that features debate about current political issues depends for its appeal on the personal qualities of the program’s moderator.

Would be helpful for community members.
Probus


_______________
Edited. Thank you.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Sep 2020
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
GMAT 1: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 2: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 3: 640 Q49 V27
GMAT 4: 650 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.55
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
The passage states that because many people tuned their channels to the station which had started airing the half hour long speech, it can be concluded that people not only like small channels as is generally known, but also like long speeches, unlike what was believed earlier.

We have to find a gap or a scenario which can weaken this conclusion. In short, we have to try and prove that people actually don't like long speeches as is being concluded now. What if many people came to the channel without knowing what was being played at that channel at that moment, and by chance bumped into this long speech. Also, what if people sure came to the channel knowingly or unknowingly, but did not stay long enough so as to help us conclude that they like long speeches.

Looking at options :

A) Well, the candidate can normally be judged on many other parameters as well. May be people liked his speech but not his personality or actions on the ground level. May be people just listened to him so as to know what is going on in the minds of politicians nowadays. This option does not have a strong link with the conclusion. It should be an incorrect choice.

B) If the ad was advertised for very long, it makes one of my weaken points nullified. It actually means that people did not just unknowingly bumped into the ad. They knew very well what it will contain and for how long it will last.It shows that they came to listen with interest. If they had no interest, they would never have come in the first place. This option acts as a strengthener. Incorrect choice.

C) If this ad was aired during a time slot normally taken by a very famous show, it becomes likely that people wanted to see that show, but accidentally happened to be present at the beginning of this long ad. In such a case, its difficult to conclude that they came because they were interested. This option acts a weaken statement and is correct.

D) This option talks about how the small ads are shown to the public, but does not talk about the long ones. It seems to have no link and is only trying to divert our attention to short length ads. Incorrect choice.

E) So a regular length program is famous if the moderator has good qualities. This option hints that the moderator of this long ad was in fact liked by the public, so people came in large numbers. This adds weight to the conclusion and is definitely not the correct choice.

Answer choice should be C
Director
Director
Joined: 28 Sep 2018
Posts: 734
Own Kudos [?]: 558 [0]
Given Kudos: 248
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 (Online)
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V37
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
shadabkhaniet wrote:
Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages. Last year, however, one candidate produced a half-hour-long advertisement. At the beginning of the half-hour slot a substantial portion of the viewing public had tuned into that station. Clearly, then, many more people are interested in lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought.


It is worth noticing the words "At the beginning of the half-hour slot" This can help us ask the question what about the end? Did the people stay till the end? did they leave? If we got to weaken the argument we got to show that the viewership was a lot only at the beginning due to some reason
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televi [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne