Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Are you ready to take your career to the next level but unsure whether to pursue an MBA or MIM degree? Well, you're in luck because today we're diving deep into this massive decision that could shape your future in the business world!
The Target Test Prep team is excited to announce multiple live online classes for GMAT Focus test-takers in May. Our 40-hour LiveTeach program will take your GMAT Focus score to the next level.
Think a 100% GMAT Focus Verbal score is out of your reach? TTP will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.
Best method to factor like a quadratic
[#permalink]
06 Feb 2010, 19:32
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 0
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
If I have an equation as follows: a^4 + 100a^2 + 2304 = 0
and I need to factor like a quadratic to: (a^2+36)(a^2+64) = 0
What is the easiest method to come up with the integers of 36 & 64? I realize the sum of the numbers must = 100, and the multiple equal 2304, but without multiple trial & errors how is 36 & 64 determined?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Best method to factor like a quadratic
[#permalink]
06 Feb 2010, 19:41
timbeckman wrote:
If I have an equation as follows: a^4 + 100a^2 + 2304 = 0
and I need to factor like a quadratic to: (a^2+36)(a^2+64) = 0
What is the easiest method to come up with the integers of 36 & 64? I realize the sum of the numbers must = 100, and the multiple equal 2304, but without multiple trial & errors how is 36 & 64 determined?
In the above equation, what value of "a" will yield 0? If a < 0 then squaring that number will give you a positive number. Am I missing something?
Re: Best method to factor like a quadratic
[#permalink]
07 Feb 2010, 11:17
Good point...I'm sorry it should have read: a^4 - 100a^2 + 2304 = 0 (a^2-36)(a^2-64) = 0 ...I realize the sum of the numbers must = -100... Same question still exists?
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Send PM
Re: Best method to factor like a quadratic
[#permalink]
07 Feb 2010, 12:58
1
Kudos
Hi Tim,
I start by creating a factor tree for 2304. I don't necessarily go down to the prime factors every time, though that's OK. For example, I get 2304 = (4 * 4 * 12 * 12) or (2^8 * 3^2).
Then I look at these numbers and think, "How do I mix and match these factors to get two numbers that sum to/differ by 100?" While there's still a bit of trial and error involved, having the factors in mind and starting in the middle (i.e. the square root of 2304 = (2^4)(3^1) = 48) can help.
First try: 48 and 48. Sum of 96, difference of 0. But 96 is close to 100....so swap a 3 and a 2 between the numbers for a small change. That is, 48/3 * 2 and 48/2 * 3.
Second try: 32 and 72. Sum of 104, difference of 40. 104 is still close to 100, but we went too far. Go back to 48 and 48 and swap a 3 and a 4 instead. That is, 48/4 * 3 and 48/3 *4.
Third try: 36 and 64. Sum of 100, difference of 28. Bingo.
The sign of the coefficients plays a role, of course. Since +2304 was positive in the quadratic, the factors will have the same sign. That tells us to focus on getting the sum of the factors to be 100. If it had been -2304, the factors would have opposite signs and we would pay attention to the difference as we try to match the middle coefficient.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Best method to factor like a quadratic [#permalink]