Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45455

By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Mar 2015, 05:19
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
4
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
60% (01:04) correct 40% (00:47) wrong based on 192 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Intern
Joined: 08 Feb 2015
Posts: 10

By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Mar 2015, 10:04
1
This post received KUDOS
Bunuel wrote: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc divisible by 3?
(1) The product of (a) times (b) is a number divisible by 3 (2) c = 3
Kudos for a correct solution. for this to be correct, a+b+c must be divisble by 3. 1: this means one/two of a and b is divisible by 3. it tells nothing about other two/one. INSUFFICIENT. 2: tells nothing about a and b. INSUFFICIENT. combine both: abc can be divisble if abc = 333 abc CAN NOT be divisible if abc 233 Ans: E



Intern
Joined: 08 Sep 2014
Posts: 17

Re: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Mar 2015, 11:34
1
This post received KUDOS
(1) a*b is divisible by 3 Let a = 3, b = 1 then if abc = 312, abc is divisible by 3 if, abc = 313 then it is not divisible by 3. INSUFFICIENT (2) c = 3 This is clearly INSUFFICIENT. Since, a & b are unknown.
(1) & (2) together also are INSUFFICIENT as seen. Hence, Answer is E.



Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 110

Re: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Mar 2015, 22:02
1
This post received KUDOS
ABC is divisible by 3 => A+B+C needs to be divisible by 3
(1) The product of (a) times (b) is a number divisible by 3 => At least a or b is divisible by 3 => INSUFFICIENT (2) c = 3 => INSUFFICIENT
(1) + (2) => At least 2 of a,b,c are divisible by 3, BUT NOT SURE a+b+c is divisible by 3
=> Answer E



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45455

Re: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Mar 2015, 06:15
Bunuel wrote: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc divisible by 3?
(1) The product of (a) times (b) is a number divisible by 3 (2) c = 3
Kudos for a correct solution. MAGOOSH OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Remember, the divisibility rule: if the sum of all the digits in a large number is divisible by 3, then the number itself is divisible by three. The problem with statement #1, for any given values of a & b that work, the one’s digit, c, could be anything. For example, a = 1, and b = 3 satisfy this condition, so that would be all the numbers in the 130’s: {130, 131, 13, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139}. Clearly, some of these are divisible by 3, namely {132, 135, 138} and the others aren’t. This statement allows for multiple answers, so this statement, alone and by itself, is not sufficient. The problem with statement #2 is that we now know the one’s digit, but the other two digits could be anything. Think about the first few possible numbers of this form: {103, 113, 123, 133, 143, 153, 163, 173, 183, 193, 203}. Of those, only (123, 153, 183) are divisible by three, and the others aren’t. In fact, you would be expected to know this, but as it happens, {103, 163, 173, 193} are prime numbers, not divisible by anything! This statement also allows for multiple answers, so this statement, alone and by itself, is not sufficient. Combined statements: now, we have to obey both constraints. One number that obeys both constraints is 133, which is not divisible by 3. Another number that obeys both constraints is 333, which is divisible by 3. Even with both statements in place, we can find numbers that produce either a “yes” or a “no” to the prompt. Even together, the statements are not sufficient. Answer = (E)
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2606
GRE 1: 323 Q169 V154

Re: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Mar 2016, 10:15



Intern
Joined: 20 Jun 2016
Posts: 45

Re: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2017, 22:38
The problem with statement #1, for any given values of a & b that work, the one's digit, c, could be anything. For example, a = 1, and b = 3 satisfy this condition, so that would be all the numbers in the 130's: {130, 131, 13, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139}. Clearly, some of these are divisible by 3, namely {132, 135, 138} and the others aren’t. This statement allows for multiple answers, so this statement, alone and by itself, is not sufficient. The problem with statement #2 is that we now know the one's digit, but the other two digits could be anything. Think about the first few possible numbers of this form: {103, 113, 123, 133, 143, 153, 163, 173, 183, 193, 203}. Of those, only (123, 153, 183) are divisible by three, and the others aren’t. In fact, you would NOT be expected to know this, but as it happens, {103, 163, 173, 193} are prime numbers, not divisible by anything! This statement also allows for multiple answers, so this statement, alone and by itself, is not sufficient. Combined statements: now, we have to obey both constraints. One number that obeys both constraints is 133, which is not divisible by 3. Another number that obeys both constraints is 333, which is divisible by 3. Even with both statements in place, we can find numbers that produce either a "yes" or a "no" to the prompt. Even together, the statements are not sufficient. Answer = (E)
_________________
Life is a challenge face it.



Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 22

Re: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2017, 07:49
For divisibility of 3, a+b+c should be a multiple of 3.
Statement 1 is not sufficient as the number can be 331 or 333.
Statement 2 is also not sufficient as the number can be 223 or 333
Statement 1 +2 also not sufficient as number can be 133 or 333
So answer is E
Posted from my mobile device




Re: By abc we denote a three digit number with digits a, b, and c. Is abc
[#permalink]
28 Oct 2017, 07:49






