Like your comment here. I had the same situation with essay #2, and I had two versions prepared for it. A traditional safe one, and a risky, eye catching one (I wrote a story about a cat). CBS is my 1st choice so I filled my application with the safe one, then 15 minutes before I submitted I decided that I am indeed a very creative person and "safe" is never my thing. Therefore i switched to my cat essay for my app.
Got an interview invite 2 weeks later and an offer within 3 weeks from submission date. I think my risky route must of worked! =][/quote]
congrats on getting in. i saw in another thread that you got into wharton as well and chose columbia. i find that to be a really interesting decision. when i started the app process i was extremely focused on prestige -- "i have to get into wharton!" during my research though, i realized that, if you set wharton's reputation aside, i think columbia is actually a better school for finance. this is just my personal opinion of course, but the electives (practioner seminars + that special value investing seminar) combined with "home field advantage" in NYC made columbia seem like a better school than wharton. it certainly seems to have a deeper finance curriculum, but i'm not sure how that plays out in recruiting.
re: your decision -- out of curiousity, why did you make your choice? i think i may have done the same (hopefully i will have that problem in R2!!).
re: essay 2: was it just me or was the speech incredibly poorly written? there did not seem to be any overt theme or coherence, just a lot of jumping around and pontificating about why people should still care about MBA school. i wrote about entrepreneruial obsession (that Roddick chick's comment) and how, while a school can't instill a passion/obsession, an MBA can unlock the potential of people who already have a passion and a strong drive. in doing so, i think i made myself sound like a super intense freak. oh well -- at least they will know i am serious