February 17, 2019  February 17, 2019 07:00 AM PST 09:00 AM PST Attend this Free Algebra Webinar and learn how to master Inequalities and Absolute Value problems on GMAT. February 18, 2019 February 18, 2019 10:00 PM PST 11:00 PM PST We don’t care what your relationship status this year - we love you just the way you are. AND we want you to crush the GMAT!
|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 20 Mar 2013
Posts: 9
Schools: ISB - Class of 2016
|
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
 06 Jul 2014, 17:52
In this Question, how is "beached" parallel to "was butchered"
Also "Whale beached on an African shore" is in active voice whereas ""Whale was subsequently butchered by hominids" is in passive voice.
So how is this construction correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2796
|
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Jul 2014, 04:44
jrashish wrote: In this Question, how is "beached" parallel to "was butchered"
Also "Whale beached on an African shore" is in active voice whereas ""Whale was subsequently butchered by hominids" is in passive voice.
So how is this construction correct? Hi jrashish, Thank you for posting your query here.  Let’s take a look at the sentence structure of this sentence: • Fossils of a whale (Clause-I) o that (Clause-II) • beached on an African shore more than a million years ago (Clause-II) • and was subsequently butchered by hominids (Clause-II) • have been recovered by paleontologists. (Clause-I) So, this sentence has two clauses as shown. The subject verb pairs in both the clauses are highlighted. Now, the dependent clause starting with “that” tells us two things about a whale: 1. It beached on an African shore at a certain time in the past 2. It was butchered by hominids. So, the verbs "beached" and "was butchered" are parallel to each other. Note that, active and passive verbs can be parallel to each other if their subject is the same. Let’s take another official example (correct version) with similar structure: • Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, o joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, o was injured three times, o and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve. Here, the list of the verbs for the subject Deborah Sampson is: 1. joined (Active Voice) 2. was injured (Passive Voice) 3. was discharged (Passive Voice) As we can see, first verb is written in active voice while second and third verbs are in passive voice. However, these verbs are parallel. Similarly in the given sentence, "beached" and "was butchered" are parallel. Hope this helps! Deepak
_________________
 
Everything you need to ace the GMAT and more
Basics of the GMAT
GMAT Exam Strategies
GMAT Study Plans
GMAT Verbal Subject Matter
GMAT AWA & IR
| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 568
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 00:28
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by palaeontologists. ANSWER IS A The subject of the sentence is "FOSSILS" which is plural, so the use of a corresponding plural verb "have" is must. A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids haveCORRECT:- correct verb "have" and correct simple past tense "beached". " that" correctly refers to the "fossils of the whale" B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids hasWRONG:- has is incorrect tense C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, hasWRONG:- has is incorrect tense. placement of "which" is incorrect. Here "which" is modifying million years instead of "whale" D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have WRONG:- "ing+been+past" is incorrect . Simple past is sufficient E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have WRONG:- "ing+past" is incorrect . Simple past is sufficient. Meaning change :- The fossils were not butchered. The whale was butchered and then the whale become a fossil after thousands of years. sudeep wrote: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.
A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have
B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has
C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has
D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have
E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
_________________
Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 14 Aug 2017
Posts: 42
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2017, 10:16
mikemcgarry chetan2u Can you please help me with my doubt of why the answer is :A: because FOSSILS are plural and in option A it is clearly violating the S-V Agreement with :WAS:Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4486
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Oct 2017, 14:01
siddyj94 wrote: mikemcgarry chetan2u Can you please help me with my doubt of why the answer is :A: because FOSSILS are plural and in option A it is clearly violating the S-V Agreement with :WAS:Thanks in advance. Dear siddyj94, I'm happy to respond.  With all due respect, my friend, I think you have gotten lost in the architecture of the sentence, because you have paired a noun with a verb even though they are at different levels of the sentence. Here's (A), with the big noun=modifying clause in green. Fossils = noun, plural, main subject of a whale = prepositional phrase, modifies " fossils" that = relative pronoun, begins a large noun-modifying relative clause, targeting the singular noun " whale" Because the target noun, " whale," is singular, the relative pronoun " that" is singular, and all the verbs in the relative clause referring to it have to be singular //beached on an African shore more than a million years ago = first branch of parallelism, singular verb inside clause and
//was subsequently butchered by hominids = second branch of parallelism, singular verb inside clause have been recovered = main verb of sentence, with plural subject " fossils" by paleontologists. You see, my friend, the GMAT loves to nest structures inside each other, and it can put parallelism at any level. It's very important, with each and every verb, to know where it is situated in the architecture of the sentence overall. See: Nested Grammatical Structures on the GMAT Sentence CorrectionDoes all this make sense? Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep
Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Professional GMAT Tutor
Affiliations: AB, cum laude, Harvard University (Class of '02)
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Posts: 674
Location: United States (CA)
Age: 39
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48 GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47 GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
WE: Education (Education)
|
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 31 Mar 2018, 13:52
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.
A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have
B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has
C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has
D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have
E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids haveCHOICE A: Correct. Notice that the VERB TENSES ARE PARALLEL here. Normally, you might assume that "fossils" is the subject, but clearly the meaning of the sentence doesn't support that conclusion (fossils can't be "butchered", only whales can). CHOICE B: Incorrect. The "then was" is not a big deal; it's functionally equivalent to "was subsequently" in Choice A. However, "has" is incorrect, because at that point we have stopped modifying the object (whale) and have returned to modifying the subject (fossils). We can't say "fossils has" ("they has"), so we move on. CHOICE C: When we write in English ".... _______, which was ..." , then the "was" is presumably modifying a subject before the comma. However, this doesn't work because it was the whale that was butchered, not years or an African shore. CHOICE D: "Having" is not by itself an actual verb, and should never be used as the main verb of a sentence, only as a modifier. CHOICE E: Same problem as E. PERFECT VERSION: Fossils of a whale, one which beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids, have been recovered by paleontologists. -Brian 
_________________
Harvard grad and 99% GMAT scorer, offering expert, private GMAT tutoring and coaching worldwide since 2002.
One of the only known humans to have taken the GMAT 5 times and scored in the 700s every time (700, 710, 730, 750, 770), including verified section scores of Q50 / V47, as well as personal bests of 8/8 IR (2 times), 6/6 AWA (4 times), 50/51Q and 48/51V (1 question wrong).
You can download my official test-taker score report (all scores within the last 5 years) directly from the Pearson Vue website: https://tinyurl.com/y7knw7bt Date of Birth: 09 December 1979.
GMAT Action Plan and Free E-Book - McElroy Tutoring
Contact: mcelroy@post.harvard.edu (I do not respond to PMs on GMAT Club.)
...or find me on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/GMATpreparation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.82
WE: Other (Commercial Banking)
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Mar 2018, 08:40
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists. A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have - CORRECT as SV agreement, Subject Fossils agrees in number with plural have B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has - Usage of has is incorrect , SV agreement error as Fossils is Plural. Also then usage is incorrect as redundant here C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has - Usage of has is incorrect , SV agreement error as Fossils is PluralD. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have - Having been" is incorrect here. Participle cannot be used as it is not parallel to butcheredE. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have - "Having been" is incorrect here. Participle cannot be used as it is not parallel to butchered. Second point what was butchered? Of course it is the whale that was butchered hence usage of were is incorrect
_________________
Never Settle for something less than what you deserve...........
I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 292
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jan 2019, 11:02
Hi GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo, As I was doing my analysis on this question, I noticed that the sentence didn't include "that" after the "and" (Fossils of a whale (that) beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and (that) was subsequently butchered by hominids....). I was wondering is there any specific reason to eliminate the second "that"? There are multiple OG questions that I have come across where the correct answer choice is usually along the lines of "XYZ that....and that...." because of the parallelism indicator "and". Would appreciate if you could please share your thoughts on this. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1395
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jan 2019, 15:31
csaluja There's no strict rule about the repetition of structuring words such as "that." The basic idea is that if the meaning is clear, we don't need to repeat. If we want to emphasize a statement's place in the overall logical structure, repetition may be helpful. A few examples: The committee found that the costs of the program would exceed any possible gains, even if substantial cost-cutting measures were taken, and that certain elements of the program would not be technically achievable for at least twenty years.Here, it was helpful to repeat "that," since so much text (including a long dependent clause) had intervened. If we just said "and certain elements," it wouldn't be clear if this were the author's opinion or a second finding of the study. She thinks that the economy will recover and job opportunities will increase.These seem very related. In fact, it seems likely that she is saying that job opportunities will increase as a result of the economic recovery. In that case, there is no need for a second "that." This is all one clear sequence. Saying "and that" isn't wrong--it's just unneeded. She thinks that the economy will recover and that disco was an annoying fad.Huh? These seem like two unrelated opinions. Saying "and that" gives them some separation. I want to sing and dance. No need to add a second "to" here. The meaning is clear. However, if these were two separate goals that I did not want to pursue at the same time, a second "to" might help to clarify that. Either way, the "to" wouldn't be wrong. It would just seem very formal for our purpose here. I want to climb Mt. Kilimanjaro and to attend business school.The second "to" helps to make it clear that these are two separate goals. Without it, one might think I am going to go to school on the mountain top!
_________________
Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 292
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2019, 06:52
DmitryFarber wrote: csaluja There's no strict rule about the repetition of structuring words such as "that." The basic idea is that if the meaning is clear, we don't need to repeat. If we want to emphasize a statement's place in the overall logical structure, repetition may be helpful. A few examples: The committee found that the costs of the program would exceed any possible gains, even if substantial cost-cutting measures were taken, and that certain elements of the program would not be technically achievable for at least twenty years.Here, it was helpful to repeat "that," since so much text (including a long dependent clause) had intervened. If we just said "and certain elements," it wouldn't be clear if this were the author's opinion or a second finding of the study. She thinks that the economy will recover and job opportunities will increase.These seem very related. In fact, it seems likely that she is saying that job opportunities will increase as a result of the economic recovery. In that case, there is no need for a second "that." This is all one clear sequence. Saying "and that" isn't wrong--it's just unneeded. She thinks that the economy will recover and that disco was an annoying fad.Huh? These seem like two unrelated opinions. Saying "and that" gives them some separation. I want to sing and dance. No need to add a second "to" here. The meaning is clear. However, if these were two separate goals that I did not want to pursue at the same time, a second "to" might help to clarify that. Either way, the "to" wouldn't be wrong. It would just seem very formal for our purpose here. I want to climb Mt. Kilimanjaro and to attend business school.The second "to" helps to make it clear that these are two separate goals. Without it, one might think I am going to go to school on the mountain top! Thank you every much for a detailed explanation! Perfectly understood now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio
[#permalink]
04 Feb 2019, 06:52
|
|
|
|
|
Go to page
Previous
1 2
[ 30 posts ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
close
