Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:17 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:17
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
 1   2   
505-555 Level|   Clauses|   Modifiers|      
User avatar
Lolaergasheva
User avatar
Joined: 04 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Jul 2011
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
981
 [115]
Given Kudos: 42
Location: US
Posts: 36
Kudos: 981
 [115]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio Updated on: 21 Jun 2021, 00:18
Originally posted by Lolaergasheva on 10 Feb 2011, 02:36.
Last edited by Bunuel on 21 Jun 2021, 00:18, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
100
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (01:05) correct 23% (01:24) wrong based on 2900 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mejia401
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Last visit: 26 Nov 2018
Posts: 253
Own Kudos:
1,428
 [40]
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States
WE:Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Posts: 253
Kudos: 1,428
 [40]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 10 Feb 2014, 03:56
24
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

First look: redundancy, verb tense, S/V agreement

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have Correct

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has Wrong - "Then...subsequently" is redundant; "has" must be plural.

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has Wrong - "which" is a misplaced modifier; "has" must be plural

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have Wrong - Passive voice "having been beached" is not required because "whale" received the actions; cannot split a subject and a verb with a comma ", have"

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have Wrong - "then subequently" is redundant; "were" must be singular form because the noun of the relative pronoun is singular "a whale"

IMO A
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,418
 [25]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,418
 [25]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 10 Feb 2011, 04:22
23
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@Lolaergasheva: Ask a simple question. What was butchered? You will know that the fossils were not butchered; it was the whale that was butchered. Can any other verb but ‘was’ suit the singular whale.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
 [7]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
 [7]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio Updated on: 05 Sep 2022, 23:52
Originally posted by ExpertsGlobal5 on 30 Aug 2022, 03:05.
Last edited by ExpertsGlobal5 on 05 Sep 2022, 23:52, edited 1 time in total.
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
Lolaergasheva
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
Show more

Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning is that a whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids, and its fossils have been recovered by paleontologists.

Concepts tested here: Subject-Verb Agreement + Meaning + Parallelism + Verb Forms + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• The simple past tense is used to refer to actions that concluded in the past.
• Any elements linked by a conjunction ("and then" in this sentence) must be parallel.
• "which/who/whose/where" when preceded by a comma, refer to the noun just before the comma.

A: Correct. This answer choice correctly refers to the plural noun "Fossils" with the plural verb "have been recovered" and to the singular noun "whale" with the singular verb "was butchered". Further, Option A uses the phrase "and was subsequently butchered by hominids", conveying the intended meaning - that the whale was subsequently butchered by hominids. Additionally, Option A correctly uses the simple past tense verbs "beached" and "was butchered" to refer to actions that concluded in the past. Option A also maintains parallelism between "beached on an African shore more than a million years ago" and "was subsequently butchered by hominids". Besides, Option A is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.

B: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the plural noun "Fossils" with the singular verb "has been recovered". Further, Option B redundantly uses "then" alongside "subsequently", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

C: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the plural noun "Fossils" with the singular verb "has been recovered". Further, Option C incorrectly modifies "more than a million years ago" with the phrase "which was subsequently butchered by hominids", producing an incoherent meaning; the intended meaning is that the whale was subsequently butchered by hominids; remember, "which/who/whose/where" when preceded by a comma, refer to the noun just before the comma.

D: This answer choice incorrectly refers to actions that concluded in the past with the present participle ("verb+ing" - "having" in this sentence) phrases "having been beached" and "having been...butchered"; remember, the simple past tense is used to refer to actions that concluded in the past.

E: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun "whale with the plural verb "were butchered". Further, Option E fails to maintain parallelism between "having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago" and "were butchered by hominids"; remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("and then" in this sentence) must be parallel. Additionally, Option E redundantly uses "then" alongside "subsequently", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

Hence, A is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Simple Tenses" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~2 minutes):



To understand the concept of "Which, Who, Whose, and Where" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
avatar
keeto702
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Last visit: 24 Apr 2011
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
6
 [6]
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
 [6]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 10 Feb 2011, 03:40
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
'That' is a relative pronoun which refers to the preceeding word. Therefore in this case that is refering to whales.

D & E are out - inadequate use of 'having been'.
Fossils is plural and requires have and not has - S&V agreement;B & C are out.
The sentence has a passive tone and requires simple past. Therefore 'was subsequently butchered' is used.

A overcomes all the mentioned errors
User avatar
BKimball
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Last visit: 16 Sep 2013
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
868
 [11]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Posts: 167
Kudos: 868
 [11]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 10 Feb 2011, 19:20
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lolaergasheva
Fossils of a whale <<that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have>> been recovered by paleontologists.

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have

This example was posted earlier, the oa is A
Can somebody explain why usage of <<was>> is correct?
Show more

You ask a good question here, and although others have given completely correct explanations I want to boil it down to a key point:

Unless there is a clear reason to use a more complex tense, you want to use the simplest tense possible. In this example, the whale beached (simple past tense) and was butchered (simple past tense). This is clear, parallel, and simple.

Hope that helps!
User avatar
singh181
User avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Last visit: 07 Nov 2011
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
38
 [11]
Posts: 11
Kudos: 38
 [11]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 07 Nov 2011, 03:51
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fossils of a whale that (beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids) have been recovered by paleontologists.

"was subsequently ......" is parallel with "beached on an ..." and describes "whale".
User avatar
tuanquang269
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Last visit: 18 May 2018
Posts: 375
Own Kudos:
1,662
 [2]
Given Kudos: 44
Status:Flying over the cloud!
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Booth PT '18 Foster '18 Goizueta '18 Ross '18 Kellogg '18 Kenan-Flagler '18 Tuck '18
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Booth PT '18 Foster '18 Goizueta '18 Ross '18 Kellogg '18 Kenan-Flagler '18 Tuck '18
Posts: 375
Kudos: 1,662
 [2]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 10 Jul 2012, 10:44
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sudeep
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.
A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have
B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has
C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has
D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have
E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
Show more

The subject of the sentence is Fossils, not Whale. So, the correct form of "have" should be "have", not "has". Hence, eliminate B and C.

In choice D and E, HAVING BEEN makes sense that the verb beached already happen and ambiguously modified either FOSSILS or WHALE. Therefore, we can eliminate choice D and E.

The remain correct one is A.
User avatar
gmatter0913
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Last visit: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
1,306
 [1]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 219
Kudos: 1,306
 [1]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 14 Sep 2013, 09:50
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My doubt is related to the usage of "that" in this problem.

Is there any difference between the below two sentences? ( I intentionally removed "subsequently")

1. Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

2. Fossils of a whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

My doubt is can we always replace a "that clause modifying a noun" with an "-ed modifier" ?

I want to quote another example from an official question.

1. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that are produced in nuclear reactions.
2. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles produced in nuclear reactions.

I fee there is a difference in the above two sentences. Kindly comment.
User avatar
Bluelagoon
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Last visit: 03 Sep 2015
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
659
 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Schools: Anderson '16 Haas EWMBA '17 (I) Kellogg 1YR '15 McCombs '16 Booth '16 Wharton Exec '17
Posts: 191
Kudos: 659
 [1]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 15 Sep 2013, 01:08
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lolaergasheva
Fossils of a whale <<that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have>> been recovered by paleontologists.

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have

This example was posted earlier, the oa is A
Can somebody explain why usage of <<was>> is correct?
Show more

this is a case in which a modifier is far away from the noun. ex :
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.
User avatar
gmatter0913
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Last visit: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
1,306
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 219
Kudos: 1,306
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 15 Sep 2013, 03:42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could somebody help me on the below, please?

My doubt is related to the usage of "that" in this problem.

Is there any difference between the below two sentences? ( I intentionally removed "subsequently")

1. Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

2. Fossils of a whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

My doubt is: can we always replace a "that clause modifying a noun" with an "-ed modifier" ?

I want to quote another example from an official question.

1. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that are produced in nuclear reactions.
2. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles produced in nuclear reactions.

I feel there is a difference in the above two sentences. Kindly comment.
User avatar
imhimanshu
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
6,135
 [7]
Given Kudos: 136
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 220
Kudos: 6,135
 [7]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 17 Sep 2013, 09:22
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatter0913
Could somebody help me on the below, please?

My doubt is related to the usage of "that" in this problem.

Is there any difference between the below two sentences? ( I intentionally removed "subsequently")

1. Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

2. Fossils of a whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

My doubt is: can we always replace a "that clause modifying a noun" with an "-ed modifier" ?

I want to quote another example from an official question.

1. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that are produced in nuclear reactions.
2. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles produced in nuclear reactions.

I feel there is a difference in the above two sentences. Kindly comment.
Show more

Hello gmatter0913

Here is my take on your sentences. I hope you'll find my explanations useful.

Lets take these sentences first-

1. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles that are produced in nuclear reactions.
2. Neutrinos are harmless elementary particles produced in nuclear reactions.

Now, your question is Can "That" be removed in this construction. The short answer is "Yes".
Because, "produced" in sentence 2 is working as Past Participle, and past participles "ed forms" are used for receiving the action i.e Nouns in question must act as Object.
If in doubt..Ask Did Elementary particles produced something?? The answer is No, rather they are being produced in Nuclear Reactions. Hence, "Produced" is working as Past Participle.
Second Trick: Whenever you see that+is/am/are/was/were, you can safely remove "that+ verb", because this is the construction used in passive voice, and ed modifiers just do the same. i.e represent Passive Voice.

Second Set - Lets analyze each sentence individually here,

1. Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

Here, beached is working as VERB- How?because "That " is a relative modifier modifying "Whale". If in doubt, who beached on African Shore -> Whale -> Subject.
was butchered -> verb.
Now, your question" Can That be Removed here"? -> I would say No, because then the sentence would be Fragment. I mean, subject Verb pair would not be same.
Lets Remove "That", so the sentence would become

Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

Lets Find - Subject verb pair -
Fossils - have been
What is the subject of beached ann was butchered? Fossils or Whale? It shoule be Fossils because subject doesn't reside in Prepositional phrase. Hence , the construction is wrong. Retrospectively, if you see, that is in ellipsis. See below.

Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and{that} was butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

2. Fossils of a whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

Lets analyze this one -
Firstly, beached is following the same logic as above. i.e. what is the subject of this verb? Fossils or Whale.
Secondly- "butchered" here is working as Participle not verb. because the whole sentence is in passive voice. Have provided an explanation above.
Let me know if it makes sense. :)
User avatar
imhimanshu
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
6,135
 [2]
Given Kudos: 136
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 220
Kudos: 6,135
 [2]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 17 Sep 2013, 20:13
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. You said that beached is a verb here [I agree.]
Clause: Whale(Subj) that beached(Verb) on an African shore more than a million years ago and [that] was(verb) butchered (verb) by hominids.

My question here is: Why is it "beached" and not "was beached"? Is there any change in the meaning if I say the below:
Fossils of a [whale that was beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids] have been recovered by paleontologists. --> [color=#7b2e00]This is not making any sense. This means that Whale didn't do the action of beaching and someone else helped Whale in doing the action. Here, beached is equivalent to "Swam"
[/color]
I understand that it is the whale that did the action "beached", whereas "butchered" has to be in passive because it is done by "hominids". Am I correct? --> This is the correct understanding.

In such case, will the 3rd sentence (posted below) be wrong?
Fossils of a [whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by paleontologists. -> This is wrong because of Parallelism. We need verb not Participle. Butchered is Past Participle here

Because this sentence says - "whale butchered by hominids" - not, "whale [that] was butchered by hominids". Honestly, I am not seeing a difference between "whale butchered by hominids" and "whale [that] was butchered by hominids". --> that is how past participle works.

See, whale butchered by Hominids. Ask.. who butchered.. and you l get the reply.. Homininds.. so, who done the action --> Hominids and whom the action have been done..? Its on WHALE. .. right.. So, Whale is not the subject... IT is the object who is recieving the ACTION(butchered).. right. So, the phrase butchered by Hominids is nothing but a modifier.

So, in that case why can't we also say "whale that was beached"?

Here, -- "was beached" is Passive Voice, depicting the action of beached is done by someone else not by WHALE. However,the action is done by "Whale", and you need a VERB. Hence, it is incorrect.

Generally, two issues usually go hand in hand in such questions --
One is parallelism and another is verb.

Let me know if it makes sense, else feel free to post your doubts. [/color]
User avatar
gmatter0913
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Last visit: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
1,306
 [1]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 219
Kudos: 1,306
 [1]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 17 Sep 2013, 23:21
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great explanation!! Thanks a lot, and I promise this is the last post. :-D Just need a confirmation from you.

So, you're saying:

1. Fossils of a [whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
The above sentence is wrong because "that" will be carried to the second part "[that] butchered by hominids". In such case, we have to use the verb "was butchered", and we cannot "that + past participle(butchered)". Is my understanding correct?

I didn't think that "that" would be carried to the second part "was butchered". "that" in ellipsis tricked me.
Lesson Learnt: Both of them have to be participles or verbs. Parallelism.

Following are the four cases on which I need your confirmation and comments.

1. participle + participle construction
Fossils of a [whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
In the above sentence, both "beached" and "butchered" are past participles.The above sentence is a right construction.

2. verb+ verb construction
Fossils of a [whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and (that) was butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists. This is correct construction.

3. verb + participle construction
Fossils of a [whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists. This is wrong as we require a verb in the second part because "that" is carried (ellipsis).Earlier, I thought this construction is valid. Lesson learnt.

4. participle + verb construction
Need your comment on the below

Fossils of a [whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
This is wrong as we don't have a object for "was butchered"

Fossils of a [whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and that was butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
 Is this a valid construction? Can "that" work as an object here? I assumed "beached" and "was" are parallel, and hence "that" may refer to "whale"
User avatar
imhimanshu
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
6,135
 [3]
Given Kudos: 136
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 220
Kudos: 6,135
 [3]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 18 Sep 2013, 00:11
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatter0913
Great explanation!! Thanks a lot, and I promise this is the last post. :-D Just need a confirmation from you.

So, you're saying:

1. Fossils of a [whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
The above sentence is wrong because "that" will be carried to the second part "[that] butchered by hominids". In such case, we have to use the verb "was butchered", and we cannot "that + past participle(butchered)". Is my understanding correct? - Correct. Either Participles or Relative Modifiers. Go by basics, relative modifiers requires verb, hence if you are using that+ participle, it will never work, defying the rules of grammar.

I didn't think that "that" would be carried to the second part "was butchered". "that" in ellipsis tricked me.
Lesson Learnt: Both of them have to be participles or verbs. Parallelism. - Bingo !

Following are the four cases on which I need your confirmation and comments.

1. participle + participle construction
Fossils of a [whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
In the above sentence, both "beached" and "butchered" are past participles.The above sentence is a right construction. -> Nopes.. It is not a correct construction. You require "beaching" here, if you want to write construction using Participles. Hence,
Fossils of a [whale beaching on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.

Reason being
-ing form is used for doing the action.
-ed forms are used for recieiving the action. Thats pretty much about modifiers. Learn it by heart, and you'll be able to implement it.

2. verb+ verb construction
Fossils of a [whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and (that) was butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists. This is correct construction. - Yes, this is correct.

3. verb + participle construction
Fossils of a [whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists. This is wrong as we require a verb in the second part because "that" is carried (ellipsis).Earlier, I thought this construction is valid. Lesson learnt. - Your reasoning is sound

4. participle + verb construction
Need your comment on the below

Fossils of a [whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
This is wrong as we don't have a object for "was butchered"

Why do you say so. For the sentence to be valid, you require only subject and verb. "I read", this is valid sentence and you don't require an object here. Moreover, Hominids is the object of the verb "was butchered". The sentence is wrong because of two issues-
One - beached is past participle and you require present participle, in case you want to write it in participle forms. As explained above - reasoning of -ing modifier.
Second - if you want to write it in verb forms, then you require "that", otherwise the sentence would be a fragment.


Fossils of a [whale beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and that was butchered by hominids] have been recovered by palaeontologists.
 Is this a valid construction? Can "that" work as an object here? I assumed "beached" and "was" are parallel, and hence "that" may refer to "whale"

Again, this is not a valid construction- beached is not a verb here.
"That" is working as an object here. However, it has nothing to do with "beached" and "was" to be parallel.
Show more

Basically, all you need to see that of the construction is using participles then, they must be parallel.
Otherwise, if constructions is using "verb form", then that is being used in parallel forms and should not have "participles"
Thats pretty much of it.

Let me know if there is any doubt
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [8]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [8]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 10 Feb 2014, 05:36
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sudeep
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
Show more


Let's split the sentence:

Subject relative clause predicate

Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

Fossils - have been recovered by the paleontologists
(Fossils- plural subject) agrees with (have- plural verb)

parallelism in relative clause

- whale that
1)beached - (verb)
and
2)was subsequently butchered- (verb)


A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have- looks good

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

Fossils has- subject verb agreement error
then subsequently- redundancy

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has-
Fossils has- subject verb agreement error

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have
participle(having...) is not parallel to verb (butchered)


E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
then subsequently- redundancy
participle(having...) is not parallel to verb (butchered)


OA- A


Hope this helps!
Dolly Sharma
Verbal Trainer
CrackVerbal
avatar
jrashish
avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2013
Last visit: 23 Dec 2015
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
6
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools: ISB - Class of 2016
Schools: ISB - Class of 2016
Posts: 8
Kudos: 6
 [2]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 06 Jul 2014, 18:52
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In this Question, how is "beached" parallel to "was butchered"

Also "Whale beached on an African shore" is in active voice whereas ""Whale was subsequently butchered by hominids" is in passive voice.

So how is this construction correct?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
 [3]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
 [3]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 08 Jul 2014, 05:44
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jrashish

In this Question, how is "beached" parallel to "was butchered"

Also "Whale beached on an African shore" is in active voice whereas ""Whale was subsequently butchered by hominids" is in passive voice.

So how is this construction correct?
Show more



Hi jrashish,

Thank you for posting your query here. :)

Let’s take a look at the sentence structure of this sentence:

• Fossils of a whale (Clause-I)
o that (Clause-II)
• beached on an African shore more than a million years ago (Clause-II)
• and was subsequently butchered by hominids (Clause-II)
• have been recovered by paleontologists. (Clause-I)

So, this sentence has two clauses as shown. The subject verb pairs in both the clauses are highlighted.

Now, the dependent clause starting with “that” tells us two things about a whale:
1. It beached on an African shore at a certain time in the past
2. It was butchered by hominids.
So, the verbs "beached" and "was butchered" are parallel to each other.

Note that, active and passive verbs can be parallel to each other if their subject is the same. Let’s take another official example (correct version) with similar structure:

• Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier's pension,
o joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22,
o was injured three times,
o and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

Here, the list of the verbs for the subject Deborah Sampson is:
1. joined (Active Voice)
2. was injured (Passive Voice)
3. was discharged (Passive Voice)

As we can see, first verb is written in active voice while second and third verbs are in passive voice. However, these verbs are parallel. Similarly in the given sentence, "beached" and "was butchered" are parallel.



Hope this helps! :)
Deepak
User avatar
LogicGuru1
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Last visit: 28 May 2024
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
2,595
 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Posts: 469
Kudos: 2,595
 [1]
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 24 Jul 2016, 01:28
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by palaeontologists.

ANSWER IS A
The subject of the sentence is "FOSSILS" which is plural, so the use of a corresponding plural verb "have" is must.

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have
CORRECT:- correct verb "have" and correct simple past tense "beached". "that" correctly refers to the "fossils of the whale"

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has
WRONG:- has is incorrect tense

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has
WRONG:- has is incorrect tense. placement of "which" is incorrect. Here "which" is modifying million years instead of "whale"

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have
WRONG:- "ing+been+past" is incorrect . Simple past is sufficient

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
WRONG:- "ing+past" is incorrect . Simple past is sufficient.
Meaning change :- The fossils were not butchered. The whale was butchered and then the whale become a fossil after thousands of years.


sudeep
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have been recovered by paleontologists.

A. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and was subsequently butchered by hominids have

B. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then was subsequently butchered by hominids has

C. that beached on an African shore more than a million years ago, which was subsequently butchered by hominids, has

D. having been beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and subsequently butchered by hominids, have

E. having beached on an African shore more than a million years ago and then subsequently were butchered by hominids have
Show more
avatar
siddyj94
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2017
Last visit: 23 May 2022
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
11
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools:  (A)
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
Schools:  (A)
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
Posts: 33
Kudos: 11
Fossils of a whale that beached on an African shore more than a millio 28 Oct 2017, 11:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry chetan2u Can you please help me with my doubt of why the answer is :A: because FOSSILS are plural and in option A it is clearly violating the S-V Agreement with :WAS:

Thanks in advance.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
188 posts