Jul 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes Jul 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jul 26 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 27 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 170
Concentration: Finance, Economics

If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2012, 02:53
Question Stats:
53% (01:30) correct 47% (01:31) wrong based on 1371 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0? (1) m < p (2) m < 0
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Kudos if you like the post!
Failing to plan is planning to fail.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56304

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2012, 02:55
If mv < pv< 0, is v > 0?Given: \(mv<pv<0\) > two cases: If \(v>0\) then when dividing by \(v\) we would have: \(m<p<0\); If \(v<0\) then when dividing by \(v\) we would have: \(m>p>0\) (flip the sign when dividing by negative value). (1) m < p > we have the first case, so \(v>0\). Sufficient. (2) m < 0 > we have the first case, so \(v>0\). Sufficient. Answer: D. Hope it's clear.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2014
Posts: 15
GMAT Date: 05282015
GPA: 3.48

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2014, 07:27
Stiv wrote: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p (2) m < 0 Statement 1 : Since m<p (mp)<0 We also know that mv<pv ie (mp)v<0 Since (mp)<0 therefore v>0 SUFFICIENT Statement 2: Given m<0 Since mv<0 therefore v > 0 SUFFICIENT Hence (D)




Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9446
Location: Pune, India

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2012, 04:00
Stiv wrote: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p (2) m < 0 You can solve such questions easily by restating '< 0' as 'negative' and '> 0' as 'positive'. mv < pv < 0 implies both 'pv' and 'mv' are negative and mv is more negative i.e. has greater absolute value as compared to pv. Since v will be equal in both, m will have a greater absolute value as compared to p. When will mv and pv both be negative? In 2 cases: Case 1: When v is positive and m and p are both negative. Case 2: When v is negative and m and p are both positive. So how will we know whether v is positive? If we know that at least one of m and p is negative, then v must be positive. If at least one of m and p is positive, then v must be negative. Now that we understand the question and the implications of the given data, we go on to the statements. Stmnt 1: m < p m has greater absolute value as compared to p but it is still smaller than p. This means m must be negative. If m is negative, p must be negative too which implies that v must be positive. Sufficient. Stmnt 2: m < 0 Very straight forward. m and p both must be negative and v must be positive. Sufficient. Answer (D) Check this post for a very similar question: ifzyxy0isxzxz101210.html#p1098097
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 731

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Mar 2013, 07:09
I made a mistake of ignoring the info in the stiumulus and picked B instead silly error great explanation Bunuel And Karishma



Intern
Status: Aiming for 750+
Joined: 16 Oct 2013
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 05052014

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2014, 00:53
I am sorry but I somehow still dont understand. I chose B, which I know is incorrect.
Well, let me tell you why I do not understand the Stmt. 1 is sufficient.
Given: mv<pv<0. It is given that MV and PV ARE ve. This means, When V is ve, M,P are +ve and vice versa.
I tabulated as below:
m v p mv pv +  +    +   
Now, statement 1 says m < p. It does not say if they are negative or positive.
So, it is possible that:
3 < 5 (m=3 and p=5) and this means V is ve
OR
3 < 1 (m=3 and p=1) and this means V is +ve
Different answers so stmt 1 should be insufficient. What I am missing?
Thank you!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56304

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2014, 01:20
flower07 wrote: I am sorry but I somehow still dont understand. I chose B, which I know is incorrect.
Well, let me tell you why I do not understand the Stmt. 1 is sufficient.
Given: mv<pv<0. It is given that MV and PV ARE ve. This means, When V is ve, M,P are +ve and vice versa.
I tabulated as below:
m v p mv pv +  +    +   
Now, statement 1 says m < p. It does not say if they are negative or positive.
So, it is possible that:
3 < 5 (m=3 and p=5) and this means V is ve
OR
3 < 1 (m=3 and p=1) and this means V is +ve
Different answers so stmt 1 should be insufficient. What I am missing?
Thank you! Ask yourself: if m=3 and p=5 and v is negative, say 1, does mv < pv< 0 hold true?
_________________



Intern
Status: Aiming for 750+
Joined: 16 Oct 2013
Posts: 21
GMAT Date: 05052014

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jan 2014, 01:31
Bunuel wrote: Ask yourself: if m=3 and p=5 and v is negative, say 1, does mv < pv< 0 hold true? Aha!! I get it now. So, when m=3, p=5 and v is ve, mv (3) becomes > pv (5) making the given condition void. So, Stmt 1 is sufficient. Great learning for the day. (This makes me wanna repeat to myself  When you pick numbers, quickly plug in to see if they are correct) I also figured this just now: mv < pv < 0 (mvpv) <0 v(mp)<0 If v is +ve, m<p (This is what the Statement 1 is saying too) If v is ve, m>p So, the answer is D. Thank you!!



Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 487
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Dec 2015, 16:19
Stiv wrote: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
(1) m < p (2) m < 0 (1) means both m and p are negative, so in order \(mv\) and \(pv\) to be < 0, \(v\) must be greater than zero. (If it's ve mv will > 0) (2) same is in (1) m<0 means \(m\) is ve, and in order mv to be negative v must be greater than zero. Answer D
_________________
When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.
Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !
800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50 GMAT PREP 670 MGMAT CAT 630 KAPLAN CAT 660



Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2016
Posts: 21

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jan 2017, 11:38
Given : \(mv<pv<0\) (a)
Statement 1) m < p I tried plugging numbers : m=3, p=2 to satisfy (a) consider different values of v : v is positive : v=5 , (3)(5) < (2)(5) < 0 = 15 < 10 < 0  satisfy (a) v is negative : v=5 , (3)(5) < (2)(5) < 0 = 15 < 10 < 0  does not satisfy (a) Hence, v must be positive
Statement 2) m < 0 from (a) , we can see that mv < 0 hence to satisfy mv < 0 when m < 0 , we need a positive value of v [(ve)*(+ve)=(ve)] Therefore v must be positive
Ans: D



Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2015
Posts: 33

If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jan 2017, 14:58
Could someone (@Bunuel) please check this alternative approach?
Rephrase stem to \(mvpv<0\) > \(v(mp)<0\)
Stm 1: \(m<p\) > \(mp<0\), so \(v\) has to be positive for the above inequality to hold true. Sufficient.
Stm 2: Now this is where i screwed it up since i focused on my rephrased inequality and completely ignored the given one. Is there a way to draw the right conclusion from this inequality \(v(mp)<0\) in combination with the constraint \(m<0\) of stm 2?
Otherwise i have to adjust my approach for those kind of questions since i tought rephrasing the question stem would in most cases help to evaluate both statements. Probably in this case it made things more complicated...
Thank you!



Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 626
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Feb 2017, 18:47
I believe it is D. Case 1) m < p mv < pv < 0 mv  pv < pv  pv < pv . Subtract pv v(mp) < 0 < pv Since m < p OR (m  p) < 0 Therefore, v must be positive. SUFF Case 2) m < 0 Since mv < 0 (given), v must be positive. SUFF Hence D.
_________________
Thanks & Regards, Anaira Mitch



Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 139
Concentration: Finance, Finance

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Dec 2017, 07:48
1. m<p, if m and p are positive then v must be ve, for example 2(2)<3(2) = 4<6 ==== Not possible. So, m and p have to be ve and v is +ve. Suff 2. m is ve so v must be +ve. Suff
Ans D



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 11719

Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Dec 2018, 06:50
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?
[#permalink]
28 Dec 2018, 06:50






