Oct 15 12:00 PM PDT  01:00 PM PDT Join this live GMAT class with GMAT Ninja to learn to conquer your fears of long, kooky GMAT questions. Oct 16 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions)
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 16

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Apr 2015, 12:24
Hi
In the question p/q, how can we be sure whether this can be reduced or it is already reduced
Also, if the first option would have been a multiple of 100 then the option would have been insufficient right? Since we could have any other prime factor



Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1220
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Apr 2015, 12:48
kirtivardhan wrote: Hi In the question p/q, how can we be sure whether this can be reduced or it is already reduced If we have only this information, we can't say nothing about state of this fraction. And if we have information only about \(r\) or about \(q\) it's the same: we can't say nothing about reducing of this fraction. I think I've got your previous question. Yes this task is exception about reducing factors: because in this case we need to know if denominator contain any other factors except \(2\) and \(5\). and we already have information that denominator is a factor of \(100\), so we know that denominator doesn't conatain any factors except \(2\) and \(5\) and we don't need to reduce fraction. kirtivardhan wrote: Also, if the first option would have been a multiple of 100 then the option would have been insufficient right? Since we could have any other prime factor Absolutely right.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 06 May 2015
Posts: 12
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Other
GPA: 3.39

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2015, 04:36
''as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits'' what does it exactly mean? Are 3.05, 9.002 etc under this category or sth else?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58340

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2015, 11:22
oishik wrote: ''as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits'' what does it exactly mean? Are 3.05, 9.002 etc under this category or sth else? Yes, because there is a finite number, respectively 2 and 3, of nonzero digits after the decimal point. For example, 1/3 = 0.33333... is not a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits, because 3's there goes infinitely.
_________________



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8005
GPA: 3.82

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Nov 2015, 06:32
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) s is a factor of 100 (2) r is a factor of 100 This is a commonly tested type of question. If we modify the question, we get a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits=terminating decimal. So, it is referring to things such as 0.2=1/5, 0.5=1/2, 0.21=21/(2^2)(5^2). But in order to become a terminating decimal, the denominator has to have 2 or 5 as their prime factors; as the question asks whether the prime factor of s is composed of only 2 or 5 in r/s, we only need to know the value of s. In condition 1, 100=(2^2)(5^2). The prime factors only include 2 or 5, so the condition is sufficient and the answer becomes (A). Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $79 for 1 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 4

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 04:42
The question asks if r/s can be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits. So, it's asking if r/s can be expressed with a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (therefore, there can be no zeroes in the decimal). So, 10, for example, would not work (there's a zero in 10).
Or are we supposed to read the "only" to refer only to the "finite number" part of the question?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58340

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 08:07
momonmoprob wrote: The question asks if r/s can be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits. So, it's asking if r/s can be expressed with a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (therefore, there can be no zeroes in the decimal). So, 10, for example, would not work (there's a zero in 10).
Or are we supposed to read the "only" to refer only to the "finite number" part of the question? "Only" refers to finite, only.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 4

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 09:29
Bunuel wrote: momonmoprob wrote: The question asks if r/s can be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits. So, it's asking if r/s can be expressed with a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (therefore, there can be no zeroes in the decimal). So, 10, for example, would not work (there's a zero in 10).
Or are we supposed to read the "only" to refer only to the "finite number" part of the question? "Only" refers to finite, only. I find that a bit confusing, is there some way I can avoid this confusion in the future? To me the wording is pretty clear, the decimal should only have a finite number of nonzero digits, in which case there should be a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (no zeroes). How are we supposed to know during the test what they mean? EDIT: Further, if they meant for the "only" to refer to "finite," only, then they simply should have wrote the question as "...can r/s can be expressed as a decimal with a finite number of nonzero digits?" That would have gotten the intended message across.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1220
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 12:52
momonmoprob wrote: Bunuel wrote: momonmoprob wrote: The question asks if r/s can be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits. So, it's asking if r/s can be expressed with a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (therefore, there can be no zeroes in the decimal). So, 10, for example, would not work (there's a zero in 10).
Or are we supposed to read the "only" to refer only to the "finite number" part of the question? "Only" refers to finite, only. I find that a bit confusing, is there some way I can avoid this confusion in the future? To me the wording is pretty clear, the decimal should only have a finite number of nonzero digits, in which case there should be a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (no zeroes). How are we supposed to know during the test what they mean? EDIT: Further, if they meant for the "only" to refer to "finite," only, then they simply should have wrote the question as "...can r/s can be expressed as a decimal with a finite number of nonzero digits?" That would have gotten the intended message across. Hello momonmoprobThe phrases "with only a finite number of nonzero digits" and "with a finite number of nonzero digits" are equal. "To me the wording is pretty clear, the decimal should only have a finite number of nonzero digits"this is not correct because the word "only" can not modify words and do not stand next to them: "with only a finite number of nonzero digits"  here word " only" modifies " finite number" "with a finite number of only nonzero digits"  here word " only" modifies " nonzero digits"
_________________



Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2018
Posts: 1

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jan 2019, 17:57
What if r=25 and s=25
Then 25/25=1
It has no decimal point in this case.
Posted from my mobile device



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58340

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jan 2019, 21:16
Goindanij wrote: What if r=25 and s=25
Then 25/25=1
It has no decimal point in this case.
Posted from my mobile device An integer IS a decimal with a finite number of nonzero digits. For example, integer 1 has 1 (finite) number of digits.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 5
Location: Spain

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Feb 2019, 02:25
Quote: 1)S is a factor of 100. So S cannot have more than two 2s and two 5s. Any number divisible be 2 or 5 gives a finite decimal. Since R and S are both positive integers, there can be no 0s in the decimal places either. So Sufficient MacFauzIf r=1, 1/100 is a possible answer as 100 is factor of 100. 1/100= 0.01 which has a zero in a decimal place. Hence, your conclusion doesn't work 100% times. Am I right?



Intern
Joined: 23 Feb 2019
Posts: 1
Location: China
Concentration: Technology, Statistics
GPA: 3.21
WE: Brand Management (Internet and New Media)

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Mar 2019, 09:59
I have trouble understanding "a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits". 0.01=1/100, but there is a zero in the decimal digits.



Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 10

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2019, 14:31
After reading explanations from Bunuel, it takes only few seconds to answer these types of questions. Thank you for all your work..



Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 379
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jul 2019, 01:08
 r and s are positive integers, the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits, if s is a multiple of 2 or 5 or both.
(1) s is a factor of 100 Yes! s is a multiple of 2 or 5 or both. SUFFICIENT
(2) r is a factor of 100 We don't know what number s is NOT SUFFICIENT
Answer is (A)



Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2018
Posts: 38

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2019, 09:35
Shouldn't the answer be 'E'? In A it is given that s is a factor of 100. But there is no information about r. If r is an unterminating number i.e 0.33333...., then r/s will not be terminating decimal. Experts, is my reasoning correct? Please do reply. chetan2u, VeritasKarishma, Bunuel, gmatbusters



Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Posts: 379
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2019, 09:41
himanshurajawat wrote: Shouldn't the answer be 'E'? In A it is given that s is a factor of 100. But there is no information about r. If r is an unterminating number i.e 0.33333...., then r/s will not be terminating decimal.
Experts, is my reasoning correct? Please do reply.
Hi, The question clearly states that if r and s are positive integers..., then either r or s must not be a fraction, be it unterminating fraction (i.e. 0.333...) or terminating fraction (i.e. 0.25)




If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
27 Aug 2019, 09:41



Go to page
Previous
1 2
[ 37 posts ]



