Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 23

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Apr 2015, 12:24
Hi
In the question p/q, how can we be sure whether this can be reduced or it is already reduced
Also, if the first option would have been a multiple of 100 then the option would have been insufficient right? Since we could have any other prime factor



Intern
Joined: 06 May 2015
Posts: 22
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Other
GPA: 3.39

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2015, 04:36
''as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits'' what does it exactly mean? Are 3.05, 9.002 etc under this category or sth else?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47983

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Nov 2015, 11:22



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 6028
GPA: 3.82

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Nov 2015, 06:32
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) s is a factor of 100 (2) r is a factor of 100 This is a commonly tested type of question. If we modify the question, we get a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits=terminating decimal. So, it is referring to things such as 0.2=1/5, 0.5=1/2, 0.21=21/(2^2)(5^2). But in order to become a terminating decimal, the denominator has to have 2 or 5 as their prime factors; as the question asks whether the prime factor of s is composed of only 2 or 5 in r/s, we only need to know the value of s. In condition 1, 100=(2^2)(5^2). The prime factors only include 2 or 5, so the condition is sufficient and the answer becomes (A). Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare The oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $99 for 3 month Online Course" "Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test" "Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 4

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 04:42
The question asks if r/s can be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits. So, it's asking if r/s can be expressed with a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (therefore, there can be no zeroes in the decimal). So, 10, for example, would not work (there's a zero in 10).
Or are we supposed to read the "only" to refer only to the "finite number" part of the question?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47983

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 08:07



Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 4

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 09:29
Bunuel wrote: momonmoprob wrote: The question asks if r/s can be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits. So, it's asking if r/s can be expressed with a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (therefore, there can be no zeroes in the decimal). So, 10, for example, would not work (there's a zero in 10).
Or are we supposed to read the "only" to refer only to the "finite number" part of the question? "Only" refers to finite, only. I find that a bit confusing, is there some way I can avoid this confusion in the future? To me the wording is pretty clear, the decimal should only have a finite number of nonzero digits, in which case there should be a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (no zeroes). How are we supposed to know during the test what they mean? EDIT: Further, if they meant for the "only" to refer to "finite," only, then they simply should have wrote the question as "...can r/s can be expressed as a decimal with a finite number of nonzero digits?" That would have gotten the intended message across.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1248
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jul 2016, 12:52
momonmoprob wrote: Bunuel wrote: momonmoprob wrote: The question asks if r/s can be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits. So, it's asking if r/s can be expressed with a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (therefore, there can be no zeroes in the decimal). So, 10, for example, would not work (there's a zero in 10).
Or are we supposed to read the "only" to refer only to the "finite number" part of the question? "Only" refers to finite, only. I find that a bit confusing, is there some way I can avoid this confusion in the future? To me the wording is pretty clear, the decimal should only have a finite number of nonzero digits, in which case there should be a finite number of nonzero digits and nothing else (no zeroes). How are we supposed to know during the test what they mean? EDIT: Further, if they meant for the "only" to refer to "finite," only, then they simply should have wrote the question as "...can r/s can be expressed as a decimal with a finite number of nonzero digits?" That would have gotten the intended message across. Hello momonmoprobThe phrases "with only a finite number of nonzero digits" and "with a finite number of nonzero digits" are equal. "To me the wording is pretty clear, the decimal should only have a finite number of nonzero digits"this is not correct because the word "only" can not modify words and do not stand next to them: "with only a finite number of nonzero digits"  here word " only" modifies " finite number" "with a finite number of only nonzero digits"  here word " only" modifies " nonzero digits"
_________________
Simple way to always control time during the quant part. How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC. 660 (Q48, V33)  unpleasant surprise 740 (Q50, V40, IR3)  antidebrief



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 7759

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2018, 11:36
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources




Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as &nbs
[#permalink]
26 Jul 2018, 11:36



Go to page
Previous
1 2
[ 30 posts ]



