Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Location: Norway
Concentration: Healthcare, International Business
GMAT Date: 11192013
WE: Brand Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2012, 08:21
Question Stats:
69% (01:01) correct 31% (01:22) wrong based on 2455 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) s is a factor of 100 (2) r is a factor of 100
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2012, 07:59
asveaass wrote: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits? 1) s is a factor of 100 2) r is a factor of 100 I don't understand the answer explanation in the OG, could someone please explain in detail? THEORY:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal. (We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.) Questions testing this concept: doesthedecimalequivalentofpqwherepandqare89566.htmlanydecimalthathasonlyafinitenumberofnonzerodigits101964.htmlifabcdandeareintegersandp2a3bandq2c3d5eispqaterminatingdecimal125789.html700question94641.htmlisrs2isaterminatingdecimal91360.htmlplexplain89566.htmlwhichofthefollowingfractions88937.htmlBACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION:If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits?(1) s is a factor of 100. Factors of 100 are: 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25, 50 and 100. All these numbers are of the form \(2^n5^m\) (for example 1=2^0*5^0, 2=2^1*5^0, ...), therefore no matter what is the value of r, r/s will always will be terminating decimal. Sufficient. (2) r is a factor of 100. We need to know about the denominator. Not sufficient. Answer: A. Hope it's clear.
_________________




VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1099
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2012, 13:18
Finite decimals are decimals which end. eg 0.5,0.25, etc. Non finite are numbers like 1/3,1/6 etc ie 0.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333.......... or 0.66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666.......... 1)S is a factor of 100. So S cannot have more than two 2s and two 5s. Any number divisible be 2 or 5 gives a finite decimal. Since R and S are both positive integers, there can be no 0s in the decimal places either. So Sufficient 2)R is a factor of 100. Cant say anything form this. R can be 1. 1/10 is finite. 1/3 is not. Insufficient. Answer is hence A.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 27

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2012, 10:02
IMO it is A, if the denominator is a factor of 100 then it could be 1; 2; 5; 10; 20.. if you divide all the positive integer by these number you will have a finite decimal result.



Senior Manager
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 421
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34 GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jan 2013, 01:25
you rock bunuel, your explanations are awesome.. thanks a lot for this one!
_________________
hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/whosaysyouneeda149706.html#p1201595My GMAT Journey : http://gmatclub.com/forum/endofmygmatjourney149328.html#p1197992



Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 8

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Dec 2013, 11:12
But it has been said the 'decimal with finite number of nonzero digits'. Now if we take 2/50 then it will be 0.04, which means its a finite decimal but definitely it does not have all the nonzero digits after decimal point. So, can anybody explain?



Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 227

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 May 2014, 11:31
Hi Bunuel,
Speaking from a prime perspective, I could factor "100" into prime factors and since I get 2^2 and 5^2, that should suffice in coming up with the right answer, correct? I don't need to pull up every single factors  right?
If the denominator had ANY other primes then it would NOT be a terminating decimal. Is that correct?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 May 2014, 02:31
halloanupam wrote: But it has been said the 'decimal with finite number of nonzero digits'. Now if we take 2/50 then it will be 0.04, which means its a finite decimal but definitely it does not have all the nonzero digits after decimal point. So, can anybody explain? 0.04 has finite number of nonzero digits: 4 is not followed by any nonzero digit.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 May 2014, 02:35
russ9 wrote: Hi Bunuel,
Speaking from a prime perspective, I could factor "100" into prime factors and since I get 2^2 and 5^2, that should suffice in coming up with the right answer, correct? I don't need to pull up every single factors  right?
If the denominator had ANY other primes then it would NOT be a terminating decimal. Is that correct? Not entirely. The denominator can have some other primes as well but if those primes can be reduced the fraction still would be terminating. For example, consider fraction 3/6. The denominator has 3 in it, but it ca be reduced to get 3/6=1/2=0.5.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 33

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2014, 23:28
Bunuel wrote: asveaass wrote: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits? 1) s is a factor of 100 2) r is a factor of 100 I don't understand the answer explanation in the OG, could someone please explain in detail? THEORY:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal. (We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.) Why is it then 130/13 or 121/11 would give finite ... infact they properly divide... Can someone please help ?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Sep 2014, 01:28
ani781 wrote: Bunuel wrote: asveaass wrote: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits? 1) s is a factor of 100 2) r is a factor of 100 I don't understand the answer explanation in the OG, could someone please explain in detail? THEORY:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal. (We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.) Why is it then 130/13 or 121/11 would give finite ... infact they properly divide... Can someone please help ? The rule above is for reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term). When you reduce 130/13 to the lowest term you get 10 and when you reduce 121/11 you get 11: 10/(2^0*5^0) and 11/(2^0*5^0) respectively. Check the links in my post above to practice more on this type of questions.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 18 Dec 2013
Posts: 24
Location: Canada
GPA: 2.84
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Nov 2014, 19:56
Bunuel wrote: THEORY:
Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).
Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.
For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal.
Hi Bunuel, Just looking for some clarification, in the highlighted text above, please correct me if I am wrong, by including the word "and" did you mean that if the denominator contains only 2's or only 5's then too the fraction is a terminating decimal? In other words, the denominator doesn't need to contain, both  2's & 5's! Thank you! dmmk



Director
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 597

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Nov 2014, 23:36
dmmkYes, examples such as \(\frac{17}{2^7}\), \(\frac{31}{5^{18}}\), and \(\frac{21}{[(2^5)(5^7)]}\) are all terminating decimals. Dabral



Director
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 510
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
GPA: 4

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Dec 2014, 11:12
Bunuel wrote: russ9 wrote: Hi Bunuel,
Speaking from a prime perspective, I could factor "100" into prime factors and since I get 2^2 and 5^2, that should suffice in coming up with the right answer, correct? I don't need to pull up every single factors  right?
If the denominator had ANY other primes then it would NOT be a terminating decimal. Is that correct? Not entirely. The denominator can have some other primes as well but if those primes can be reduced the fraction still would be terminating. For example, consider fraction 3/6. The denominator has 3 in it, but it ca be reduced to get 3/6=1/2=0.5. Bunuel I did not understand from your post whether we can have other primes in denominator? Can you pls. repeat?
_________________
If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!



Director
Affiliations: GMATQuantum
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 597

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Dec 2014, 23:50
ErgenekonFor a fraction to be a terminating decimal the only primes that can be present in the denominator are 2 and 5, and this only applies to reduced form of the fraction. If there is any other prime in the denominator, then the fraction will be nonterminating. For example, \(\frac{21}{[(2^4)(5^3)(11^2)]}\), \(\frac{11}{[(5^6)(7^3)]}\), and \(\frac{22}{(7^4)}\) are all nonterminating decimals. Dabral



Director
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 510
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
GPA: 4

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Dec 2014, 00:35
dabral wrote: ErgenekonFor a fraction to be a terminating decimal the only primes that can be present in the denominator are 2 and 5, and this only applies to reduced form of the fraction. If there is any other prime in the denominator, then the fraction will be nonterminating. For example, \(\frac{21}{[(2^4)(5^3)(11^2)]}\), \(\frac{11}{[(5^6)(7^3)]}\), and \(\frac{22}{(7^4)}\) are all nonterminating decimals. Dabral Thanks Dabral. Got it now.
_________________
If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!



Intern
Joined: 11 Mar 2015
Posts: 1

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Mar 2015, 17:14
Hello, what if r is the same as s? Then we don't have a finite decimal but an integer. Then A should not be sufficient as the answer can be a decimal or an integer. Am I wrong in my thinking?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Mar 2015, 03:15
ptanwar1 wrote: Hello, what if r is the same as s? Then we don't have a finite decimal but an integer. Then A should not be sufficient as the answer can be a decimal or an integer. Am I wrong in my thinking? An integer IS a decimal with a finite number of nonzero digits. For example, integer 51 has 2 (finite) number of digits.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 16

Re: If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Apr 2015, 12:01
Hi Bunnel,
A couple of questions:
1) In a DS question how would you decide whether a fraction is reduced?
2) If the denominator has a prime factor other than 2 and/or 5 what should be the approach.With what i percieve from your previous explanations, in such a case we would have to check whether the fraction is reduced.If the perception is correct how to decide that.
3) Is this a universal rule ?
4) How would such rules click in the exam?
Regards



Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1215
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40

If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Apr 2015, 12:14
kirtivardhan wrote: Hi Bunnel,
A couple of questions:
1) In a DS question how would you decide whether a fraction is reduced?
2) If the denominator has a prime factor other than 2 and/or 5 what should be the approach.With what i percieve from your previous explanations, in such a case we would have to check whether the fraction is reduced.If the perception is correct how to decide that.
3) Is this a universal rule ?
4) How would such rules click in the exam?
Regards Hello kirtivardhan1) In a DS question how would you decide whether a fraction is reduced?In any question fraction can be reduced if nominator and denominator have a common factors. \(\frac{6}{10}\) is not reduced fraction because \(6\) and \(10\) have common factor \(2\). We should divide both parts on \(2\) and receive \(\frac{3}{5}\) 2) If the denominator has a prime factor other than 2 and/or 5 what should be the approach.With what i percieve from your previous explanations, in such a case we would have to check whether the fraction is reduced.If the perception is correct how to decide that.Firstly you should reduced fraction as described in previous clause. Secondly you should check if denomitaor has primes others than \(2\) and \(5\). 3) Is this a universal rule ?Yes 4) How would such rules click in the exam?I haven't take real exam but meet such questions like 1 times per two exams (CATs). Usually it's quite simple questions so you should know this principle, because if you lose such question, you'll lose overall complexity of next questions and this will be have negative impact on your final score.
_________________




If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as
[#permalink]
26 Apr 2015, 12:14



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 37 posts ]



