Aug 20 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Aug 20 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT Take 20% off the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 8/20 Aug 22 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT What you'll gain: Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics, and much more. Thursday, August 22nd at 9 PM EDT Aug 24 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC Aug 25 09:00 AM PDT  12:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day verbal workshop and learn how to ace the Verbal section with the best tips and strategies. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Aug 25 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 270

Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 23 May 2013, 05:03
Question Stats:
83% (00:36) correct 17% (00:55) wrong based on 864 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by vaivish1723 on 23 Jan 2010, 00:37.
Last edited by Bunuel on 23 May 2013, 05:03, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the OA, it must be B not E




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57145

Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Jan 2010, 00:54
vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 222

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jan 2010, 09:22
Bunuel wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B. (OA must be wrong) Hello Bunuel How can we say that the fraction given is a "reduced fraction". Because if it's not than 70/8 is a nonterminating value.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57145

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jan 2010, 10:18
nverma wrote: Hello Bunuel
How can we say that the fraction given is a "reduced fraction". Because if it's not than 70/8 is a nonterminating value. Denominator already has only 2s so in this case it's doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not. For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal. We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 112

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2010, 05:29
Bunuel please excuse the stupid question but I'm quite weak in these types of questions.
* Does the rule basically say that any integer divided by either 2, 5, a multiple of either, or a product of these multiples will have a finite amount of decimals?
So any integer divided by any multiple of 5 will have a finite amount of decimals, etc.?
* And another basic question: 0 is neither positive nor negative right?
* I also don't completely understand what to do when we don't know whether the fraction is reduced to its lowest form. Can we still apply the same rule?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57145

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2010, 07:43
nickk wrote: Bunuel please excuse the stupid question but I'm quite weak in these types of questions.
1.Does the rule basically say that any integer divided by either 2, 5, a multiple of either, or a product of these multiples will have a finite amount of decimals?
2. So any integer divided by any multiple of 5 will have a finite amount of decimals, etc.?
3. And another basic question: 0 is neither positive nor negative right?
4. I also don't completely understand what to do when we don't know whether the fraction is reduced to its lowest form. Can we still apply the same rule?
1. Not multiples but when denominator has only 2 and/or 5 in any integer power; 2. No, multiples of 5 are 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, ... 1/30 won't be terminating as there is 3 in denominator. Maybe you meant 5 in any power? Then yes; 3. Yes, (though it's even); 4. If fraction has only 2 or/and 5 in denominator then it does not matter whether it's reduced. If there is some other integer in denominator we need reducing to see whether it can be cancelled.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2009
Posts: 112

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Feb 2010, 08:01
Thanks! that explains everything



Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Posts: 137

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Oct 2011, 22:47
Nice explanation there! Answer should be B
_________________



Intern
Joined: 26 May 2011
Posts: 13
Location: United States

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Oct 2011, 07:34
How to know these properties before, some book/site has these properties covered thoroughly.



Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1716

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Oct 2011, 07:41
arnoorichenna wrote: How to know these properties before, some book/site has these properties covered thoroughly. gmatmathbook87417.htmlMGMAT Strategy Guides 4th Edition OG12, OG Quantitative Review 2 Nothing else is required beyond these for GMAT related quantitative concepts.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Posts: 172
Location: United States

Re: pl explain
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Oct 2011, 13:42
It is a repeat soln is explained in 700question94641.html
_________________




Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 234

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 19:01
Bunuel wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B. Hi Bunuel, One question  if we know that the denominator only has powers of 5 OR only has powers of 2  it's irrelevant if the denominator is great or less than the numerator, the fraction will still end up in a terminating decimal. is that correct?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57145

Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Sep 2014, 00:15
russ9 wrote: Bunuel wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B. Hi Bunuel, One question  if we know that the denominator only has powers of 5 OR only has powers of 2  it's irrelevant if the denominator is great or less than the numerator, the fraction will still end up in a terminating decimal. is that correct? Yes. \(\frac{integer}{2^n5^m}\), for nonnegative integers n and m, will be a terminating decimal irrespective of the numerator.
_________________



Senior Manager
Status: The Final Countdown
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 280
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.84
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Dec 2014, 12:30
Bunuel wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B. the doubt i have regarding this concept is: The prime factors of the denominator cannot be anything except 2 and/or 5? eg. 1/30 will not be a terminating decimal as it has 3 too?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57145

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Dec 2014, 12:47
Ralphcuisak wrote: Bunuel wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B. the doubt i have regarding this concept is: The prime factors of the denominator cannot be anything except 2 and/or 5? eg. 1/30 will not be a terminating decimal as it has 3 too? Yes, 1/30 will not be a terminating decimal.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2016
Posts: 112

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 May 2018, 10:37
Bunuel wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B. Hi Bunuel, In this question it was not mentioned that P/Q is in reduced form So how can we use the 2\sqrt{m}*5\sqrt{n}. Is it assumed that it is in reduced form?? Thanks in advance



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57145

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 May 2018, 12:21
suramya26 wrote: Bunuel wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: 26 Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? (1) P>Q (2) Q=8 Please explain Oa is Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Question: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits? According to the above we must determine whether the denominator (after reducing the fraction, if possible) contains only the 2s and/or 5s as the prime factors. (1) P>Q, clearly insufficient. (2) Q=8=2^3, hence denominator has only 2 as prime factor. Fraction P/Q will be terminated decimal. Sufficient. Answer: B. Hi Bunuel, In this question it was not mentioned that P/Q is in reduced form So how can we use the 2\sqrt{m}*5\sqrt{n}. Is it assumed that it is in reduced form?? Thanks in advance If denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not. For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal. We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 02 May 2015
Posts: 2
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GPA: 3.45

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 03:07
vaivish1723 wrote: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits?
(1) P>Q (2) Q=8 What does this question mean?



Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1434
Location: India

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jun 2018, 22:22
Mahadi Hasan wrote: vaivish1723 wrote: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits?
(1) P>Q (2) Q=8 What does this question mean? Lets look at a fraction 1/2. When you convert 1/2 to decimal, what do you get: 0.5. This has a finite number of nonzero digits (only one non zero digit, which is '5'). Now consider fraction 1/3. When you convert 1/3 to decimal, you get 0.333333... (unending). This contains infinite number of nonzero digits. So the question is asking whether P/Q has a finite or an infinite number of nonzero digits?



Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 10

Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2019, 14:29
Thank you, Bunuel. Your explanations are simply awesome..




Re: Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are
[#permalink]
29 Jul 2019, 14:29






