Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 15:24 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 15:24

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92977
Own Kudos [?]: 619708 [1]
Given Kudos: 81613
Send PM
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Jan 2022
Posts: 832
Own Kudos [?]: 643 [1]
Given Kudos: 558
Location: Italy
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Dec 2022
Posts: 95
Own Kudos [?]: 55 [2]
Given Kudos: 18
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92977
Own Kudos [?]: 619708 [0]
Given Kudos: 81613
Send PM
Re: In 1994, TipTop Airlines reported an increase in the total number of [#permalink]
Expert Reply

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



In 1994, TipTop Airlines reported an increase in the total number of passengers it carried from the year before, but a decrease in total revenues — even though prices for its tickets on all routes remained unchanged during the two-year period.

Which of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparent paradox described above?


First, restate the contradiction in your own words. “TipTop’s profits went down even though they flew more passengers.” Now, let’s see which of the answer choices makes both of the facts in the argument true.


A. TipTop Airlines was a victim of a mild recession in 1994.

If TipTop was affected by a recession, that might explain a loss of revenues. But because ticket prices remained the same, it would not explain how the number of passengers could have increased at the same time. Eliminate it.


B. Total passenger miles were up in 1994.

If total passenger miles were up, and prices remained the same, there is no way that there could have been a loss of revenues. We can eliminate this choice as well.


C. Fuel costs remained constant during the two-year period.

If fuel costs had not remained constant, the company’s profits might have fallen. An increase in fuel prices could have increased its costs and cut into profits. But it would not have cut into total revenues, which is what we are concerned with in this passage. Of course, because choice C told us that the costs remained constant, this choice has no bearing on the argument at all. Eliminate it.


D. Passengers traveled shorter (and thus less expensive) distances in 1994.

Bingo! If passengers traveled on short, inexpensive flights, then they paid less money. In spite of the increase in number of passengers, the money they paid could have added up to less than that of the year before. This is the best answer, but always remember to read all the choices anyway.


E. TipTop did not buy any new airplanes or equipment in 1994.

This answer is much like the third choice, which we call choice C. If TipTop had bought new planes, it might have cut into its profits, but it would not have had any bearing on revenues. Of course, because this choice told us that TipTop did not buy any planes, there is no relevance at all. Eliminate it.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In 1994, TipTop Airlines reported an increase in the total number of [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne