Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 10:39 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 10:39

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Zapopan Mexico
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4349
Own Kudos [?]: 30801 [6]
Given Kudos: 637
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 81
Own Kudos [?]: 209 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 155
Own Kudos [?]: 473 [3]
Given Kudos: 48
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Send PM
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dati [#permalink]
3
Kudos
In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
--> it changes the meaning severely conveying that stone points are excavating something from the layers--> nuisance meaning

b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated

c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
--> no verb here sentence incorrect better say fragment.

d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
--> CORRECT it conserves the meaning

e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers
--> changes the meaning

D is the best one.

HTH
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [0]
Given Kudos: 42
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Send PM
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dati [#permalink]
riteshv wrote:
What's wrong with A


ditto. Since I'm not familiar with the subject matter, neither A or D sounds "right" to me.

i don't know if excavating is an active process or it happened in the past from the sentence.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dati [#permalink]
hero4th wrote:
34. In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.
a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers

Could someone explain me, why is answer C wrong. Additionally, could you explain the important differences between answer C and D. I believe the difference is the idiom "published on" or "published about" but not sure.
Best regards.

FYI I´m amazed with the book GMAT ULTIMATE GRAMMAR, I bought it and it´s great. I´ve read it all and I found only 2 cons.
1 There is no explanation for the answers.
2 some orthographic mistakes (most of them irrelevant to the context).




Ans Exp

first we should get that subject is singular report so the verb must also be in singular so the actual sentence correctly uses the helping verb but excavating is used for continuous tense as the question is about past so eliminate A on this basis then we are left with b,c,d,e and we can eliminate b because it uses wrong verb were for singular report so we have c,d,e, as c uses' published about' so which makes it wrong, about is used only to describe some thing, so here the report is not describing about stone projectile it's just providing information so eliminate c on this basis, then we are left with d and e we can take d as correct answer because is uses correct verb 'was' and past tense of word excavated so we are left with e Makes total mockery with no correct meaning so eliminate e .


Answer Option is d ,hope it's clear.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [0]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dati [#permalink]
"...........the report was published on stone projectile points...........". How can a report publish on stone projectile points at all? Shouldn't it be" the report on stone projectile points was published"

Where am I getting wrong?

egmat wrote:
Hi All,

In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.



In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points. These points date back 64,000 years and have been excavated from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.



The verb-ing modifier “excavating” has been placed right after “64,000 years” without any comma preceding it. This means that this modifier is referring to “64,000 years”. This is absolutely illogical because now the sentence suggests that “64,000 years” did the action of excavating. This is the only error in the sentence. Now let’s run the POE to find the correct answer.

POE:

Choice A: Incorrect. Modifier error as discussed above.

Choice B: were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated: Incorrect. Firstly, this choice has subject verb number agreement error. Singular “a report” cannot have plural verb “were published”. Secondly, change in the placement of “layers” makes the sentence illogical.

Choice C: published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers: Incorrect. Absence of “was” before “published” turns the sentence into active voice. The sentence now suggests that “a report” did the action of publishing about “stone projectile points”. However, the facts are published in a report. A report does not do the job of publishing.

Choice D: was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers. Correct. This choice turns “excavating” to “excavated” that refers to “stone projectile points”. This means that these points were excavated in South Africa.

Choice E: on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers: Incorrect. “published about layers” suggests that some facts were published about the layers. This choice has an illogical meaning.

PS @hero4th: Please read the explanation of Choices C and D to find the difference between the two. Here it is voice issue rather than the idiom.



1. A verb-ing modifier modifies the immediate preceding noun if the modifier is not preceded by a comma.
2. We must use correct voice to convey the logical intended meaning of the sentence.
3. Notice the change in placements of words as they may change the meaning of the sentence.

Hope this helps.

Thanks.
Shraddha
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jun 2021
Posts: 285
Own Kudos [?]: 345 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
GPA: 3.86
Send PM
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dati [#permalink]
In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers of ancient sediment in Sibudu Cave, South Africa.

1.In the red marked, The sentence meant to convey a verb "that the stone was brought up"
However "excavating" is not verb. We may look for a verb. for example, "Excavated"
2.In the green mark, The sentence meant to convey the stone was "Excavated" From layers of....

Now lets compare the choices,

a) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavating from layers
>>> excavating needs to be replaced with a verb
b) were published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years layers excavated
>>> the subject "a report" cannot take a plural verb. + a stone was extracted not the layers.
c) published about stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
>>> report can not published itself! somebody else did the action. Thus, necessitating a be verb "was".
d) was published on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years excavated from layers
>>> everything seems right.
e) on stone projectile points dating back 64,000 years was published about layers
>>> It is not not about layers. It is from layers

IMO option D is only correct choice.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In August 2010, a report was published on stone projectile points dati [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne