In principle, a cohesive groupone whose members generally agree with

Question

In principle, a cohesive group—one whose
members generally agree with one another and
support one another’s judgments—can do a much
better job at decision making than it could if it were
  (5)   noncohesive. When cohesiveness is low or lacking
entirely, compliance out of fear of recrimination is
likely to be strongest. To overcome this fear,
participants in the group’s deliberations need to be
confident that they are members in good standing and
  (10)   that the others will continue to value their role in the
group, whether or not they agree about a particular
issue under discussion. As members of a group feel
more accepted by the others, they acquire greater
freedom to say what they really think, becoming less
  (15)   likely to use deceitful arguments or to play it safe by
dancing around the issues with vapid or conventional
comments. Typically, then, the more cohesive a group
becomes, the less its members will deliberately censor
what they say out of fear of being punished socially
  (20)   for antagonizing their fellow members.

But group cohesiveness can have pitfalls as well:
while the members of a highly cohesive group can
feel much freer to deviate from the majority, their
desire for genuine concurrence on every important
  (25)   issue often inclines them not to use this freedom. In a
highly cohesive group of decision makers, the danger
is not that individuals will conceal objections they
harbor regarding a proposal favored by the majority,
but that they will think the proposal is a good one
  (30)   without attempting to carry out a critical scrutiny that
could reveal grounds for strong objections. Members
may then decide that any misgivings they feel are not
worth pursuing—that the benefit of any doubt should
be given to the group consensus. In this way, they
  (35)   may fall victim to a syndrome known as
“groupthink,” which one psychologist concerned with
collective decision making has defined as “a
deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and
moral judgment that results from in-group pressures.”

(40)   Based on analyses of major fiascoes of
international diplomacy and military decision making,
researchers have identified groupthink behavior as a
recurring pattern that involves several factors:
overestimation of the group’s power and morality,
  (45)   manifested, for example, in an illusion of
invulnerability, which creates excessive optimism;
closed-mindedness to warnings of problems and to
alternative viewpoints; and unwarranted pressures
toward uniformity, including self-censorship with
  (50)   respect to doubts about the group’s reasoning and a
concomitant shared illusion of unanimity concerning
group decisions. Cohesiveness of the decision-making
group is an essential antecedent condition for this
syndrome but not a sufficient one, so it is important
  (55)   to work toward identifying the additional factors that
determine whether group cohesiveness will deteriorate
into groupthink or allow for effective decision
making.    1 
 1. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

(A) Despite its value in encouraging frank discussion, high cohesion can lead to a debilitating type of group decision making called groupthink.
(B) Group members can guard against groupthink if they have a good understanding of the critical role played by cohesion.
(C) Groupthink is a dysfunctional collective decision-making pattern that can occur in diplomacy and military affairs.
(D) Low cohesion in groups is sometimes desirable when higher cohesion involves a risk of groupthink behavior.
(E) Future efforts to guard against groupthink will depend on the results of ongoing research into the psychology of collective decision making.

2 
 2. A group of closely associated colleagues has made a disastrous diplomatic decision after a series of meetings marked by disagreement over conflicting alternatives. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to say that this scenario

(A) provides evidence of chronic indecision, thus indicating a weak level of cohesion in general
(B) indicates that the group’s cohesiveness was coupled with some other factor to produce a groupthink fiasco
(C) provides no evidence that groupthink played a role in the group’s decision
(D) provides evidence that groupthink can develop even in some groups that do not demonstrate an “illusion of unanimity”
(E) indicates that the group probably could have made its decision-making procedure more efficient by studying the information more thoroughly

3 
3. Which one of the following, if true, would most support the author’s contentions concerning the conditions under which groupthink takes place?

(A) A study of several groups, each made up of members of various professions, found that most fell victim to groupthink.
(B) There is strong evidence that respectful dissent is more likely to occur in cohesive groups than in groups in which there is little internal support.
(C) Extensive analyses of decisions made by a large number of groups found no cases of groupthink in groups whose members generally distrust one another’s judgments.
(D) There is substantial evidence that groupthink is especially likely to take place when members of a group develop factions whose intransigence prolongs the group’s deliberations.
(E) Ample research demonstrates that voluntary deference to group opinion is not a necessary factor for the formation of groupthink behavior.

4 
 4. The passage mentions which one of the following as a component of groupthink?

(A) unjustified suspicions among group members regarding an adversary’s intentions
(B) strong belief that the group’s decisions are right
(C) group members working under unusually high stress, leading to illusions of invulnerability
(D) the deliberate use of vapid, clichéd arguments 
(E) careful consideration of objections to majority positions

5 
 5. It can be inferred from the passage that both the author of the passage and the researchers mentioned in the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements about groupthink?

(A) Groupthink occurs in all strongly cohesive groups, but its contribution to collective decision making is not fully understood.
(B) The causal factors that transform group cohesion into groupthink are unique to each case.
(C) The continued study of cohesiveness of groups is probably fruitless for determining what factors elicit groupthink.
(D) Outside information cannot influence group decisions once they have become determined by groupthink.
(E) On balance, groupthink cannot be expected to have a beneficial effect in a group’s decision making.

6 
 6. In the passage, the author says which one of the following about conformity in decision-making groups?

(A) Enforced conformity may be appropriate in some group decision situations.
(B) A high degree of conformity is often expected of military decision-making group members.
(C) Inappropriate group conformity can result from inadequate information.
(D) Voluntary conformity occurs much less frequently than enforced conformity.
(E) Members of noncohesive groups may experience psychological pressure to conform.

7 
 7. In line 5, the author mentions low group cohesiveness primarily in order to

(A) contribute to a claim that cohesiveness can be conducive to a freer exchange of views in groups
(B) establish a comparison between groupthink symptoms and the attributes of low-cohesion groups
(C) suggest that there may be ways to make both cohesive and noncohesive groups more open to dissent
(D) indicate that both cohesive and noncohesive groups may be susceptible to groupthink dynamics
(E) lay the groundwork for a subsequent proposal for overcoming the debilitating effects of low cohesion

8 
 8. Based on the passage, it can be inferred that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following?

(A) Highly cohesive groups are more likely to engage in confrontational negotiating styles with adversaries than are those with low cohesion.
(B) It is difficult for a group to examine all relevant options critically in reaching decisions unless it has a fairly high degree of cohesiveness.
(C) A group with varied viewpoints on a given issue is less likely to reach a sound decision regarding that issue than is a group whose members are unified in their outlook.
(D) Intense stress and high expectations are the key factors in the formation of groupthink.
(E) Noncohesive groups can, under certain circumstances, develop all of the symptoms of groupthink.

desertEagle · Answer

5. It can be inferred from the passage that both the author of the passage and the researchers mentioned in the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements about groupthink?

(A) Groupthink occurs in all strongly cohesive groups, but its contribution to collective decision making is not fully understood.
(B) The causal factors that transform group cohesion into groupthink are unique to each case.
(C) The continued study of cohesiveness of groups is probably fruitless for determining what factors elicit groupthink.
(D) Outside information cannot influence group decisions once they have become determined by groupthink.
(E) On balance, groupthink cannot be expected to have a beneficial effect in a group’s decision making.

The author portrays "groupthink" in negative light. Groupthink is described to be one of major pitfalls as given in the following lines 
 But group cohesiveness can have pitfalls as well 
 researchers have identified groupthink behavior as a
 recurring pattern  that involves several factors:

(A) Groupthink occurs in  all  strongly cohesive groups, but its contribution to collective decision making is not fully understood. - all is Extreme
(B) The causal factors that transform group cohesion into groupthink are  unique  to each case. - unique is extreme
(C) The continued study of cohesiveness of groups is probably fruitless for determining what factors elicit groupthink. - wrong - the author says more study is required - Opposite
(D)  Outside information  cannot influence group decisions once they have become determined by groupthink. - Out of scope - no discussion about outside information
(E) On balance, groupthink cannot be expected to have a beneficial effect in a group’s decision making. - Negative portrayal of groupthink implies this

Ans E

desertEagle · Answer

8. Based on the passage, it can be inferred that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following?

(A) Highly cohesive groups are more likely to engage in  confrontational negotiating styles  with adversaries than are those with low cohesion. - No such thing is given - INCORRECT
(B) It is difficult for a group to examine all relevant options critically in reaching decisions unless it has a fairly high degree of cohesiveness.
(C) A group with varied viewpoints on a given issue is  less likely  to reach a sound decision regarding that issue than is a group whose members are unified in their outlook. - OPPOSITE - INCORRECT
(D)  Intense stress and high expectations  are the key factors in the formation of groupthink.- No such thing is given - INCORRECT
(E) Noncohesive groups can, under certain circumstances, develop  all  of the symptoms of groupthink. No such thing is given - INCORRECT

Ans B

amanbachhawat · Answer

1.

The point of the passage is to appreciate cohesive group thinking while while also considering its demerits - mainly groupthink.

That’s what answer choice (A) says. Ans A. 
(B) Groupthink may be caused by factors other than cohesion as well. We do not have sufficient information about this. 
(C) Does not consider the information given in the first two paragraphs. Choice focuses on a specific example and not the passage as a whole. 
(D) The passage does not consider low cohesion as a preference to groupthink in highly cohesive groups.
(E) This choice focuses too much on specific details in the third paragraph.

amanbachhawat · Answer

2. 
2. Groupthink has been specified as a demerit in connection with high cohesiveness. Consider the he situation given in the question "series of meetings marked by disagreement over conflicting alternatives." There is nothing given in the passage about a situation wherein there is no or low cohesion when taking groupthink into account. Ans C.

(A) "chronic indecision" is too extreme. Further, this is a generic statement and may sound correct - however, cannot be inferred from the passage. 
(B) It is not necessary that the situation presented in the question has resulted in a groupthink fiasco. Further, disagreement and conflicting alternatives may not necessarily be a consequence of groupthink. 
(D) Out of scope. this situation has not been discussed in the passage. 
(E) Out of scope.

amanbachhawat · Answer

3. The author in paragraph 1 talks about the advantages of cohesive group thinking and further states "As members of a group feel more accepted by the others, they acquire greater freedom to say what they really think..." - implying a certain basis for trust amongst the group members. Then the author states that while cohesive group thinking has its advantages - its main danger is Groupthink. When that trust/agreement is given without criticism, groupthink is most likely. Answer (C) provides support on this connection.

amanbachhawat · Answer

4. This answer can be directly inferred. Paragraph 2 - " In a highly cohesive group of decision makers, the danger is not that individuals will conceal objections they harbor regarding a proposal favored by the majority, but that they will think the proposal is a good one without attempting to carry out a critical scrutiny that could reveal grounds for strong objections. Members may then decide that any misgivings they feel are not worth pursuing—that the benefit of any doubt should be given to the group consensus." Ans. (B)

amanbachhawat · Answer

6. The answer to this question can be directly inferred from lines 5-7 "When cohesiveness is low or lacking entirely, compliance out of fear of recrimination is likely to be strongest" Ans (E)

Danush649 · Answer

Sajjad1994 
Hi sajjad 
Could you explain why B is correct in question 8.(I feel like it sounds a bit extreme to say  unless  and  high degree  of cohesiveness)

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

8. Based on the passage, it can be inferred that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following?

Explanation

Another question stem with no direct clues as to where you should look to answer the question. Go through choice by choice and eliminate the four answers that you cannot definitively support with information from the passage.

(A)  Who’s more likely to engage in confrontational negotiating styles with adversaries is not discussed in the passage. Moreover, Paragraph 4 seems to give us an example of the opposite: If groupthink occurs in highly cohesive groups and a characteristic of groupthink is the closed-mindedness to adversaries, then it seems likely that they would not engage in any confrontations or negotiations with their adversaries.

(B) is the correct answer.   The key phrase here is  “examine all relevant options critically.”  The author’s key contention is that the blind allegiance to the group, a characteristic of groupthink, prevents members from voicing objections and thinking through the issues thoughtfully. Additionally, in Paragraph 2 the author points out that high-cohesion groups are much freer to deviate from the majority  (lines 22–23)  than low cohesion groups. While groupthink can occur in situations with high cohesion, it must not necessarily occur and leaves open the possibility for critical thought on issues being discussed. One thing you know for sure is that low cohesion (and groupthink) prevents critical thought; if it’s going to happen, it’s going to happen in an ideal, high-cohesion group only.

(C)  may be true, but the author doesn’t think so. Because of its high degree of uniformity and conformity, the author questions the validity of decisions in groupthink situations.

(D)  Groupthink can develop from in-group pressures, but it’s not clear whether those pressures involve intense stress and high expectations.

(E)  This could be true but that’s not good enough for a correct answer to an Inference question. While the author is open to the possibility of groupthink occurring in non-cohesive groups, the specific circumstances giving rise to groupthink in non-cohesive groups are not mentioned.

Answer: B

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

In principle, a cohesive groupone whose members generally agree with

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

In principle, a cohesive groupone whose members generally agree with

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards