Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1912:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep....
May 2008:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
What’s in it for you- Live Profile Evaluation Chat Session with Jenifer Turtschanow, CEO, ARINGO. Come with your details prepared and ARINGO will share insights! Pre-MBA Role/Industry, YOE, Exam Score, C/GPA, ECs Post-MBA Role/ Industry & School List.
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
04 Dec 2020, 02:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
nalinnair
Solution:
We are told that lines k and l both contain the point (1, 1). The question is whether the y-intercept of k is greater than the y-intercept of l. Let a be the y-intercept of line k and b be the y-intercept of line l. The question now becomes whether a > b.
Statement One Alone:
The slope of k is less than the slope of l
Since the y-intercept of line k is a, line k passes through (0, a). We also know that line k passes through (1, 1), so we can apply the slope formula with these two points:
Slope k = (a - 1)/(0 - 1) = (a - 1)/(-1) = 1 - a
Similarly, since the y-intercept of line l is b, line l passes through (0, b). Let’s apply the slope formula using the points (0, b) and (1, 1):
Slope l = (b - 1)/(0 - 1) = 1 - b
Now, statement 1 tells us that slope of k is less than slope of l. Thus:
1 - a < 1 - b
-a < -b
a > b
Recall that a was the y-intercept of line k and b was the y-intercept of line l. It follows that the y-intercept of line k is greater than the y-intercept of line l. This answers the question. Statement one alone is sufficient.
Statement Two Alone:
The slope of l is positive
Recall that in the analysis of statement one, we actually showed that if two lines pass through the point (1, 1), then the line with the smaller slope has greater y-intercept. In one scenario, assume that the slope of line k is 1 and the slope of line l is 2. In this case, the y-intercept of line k is greater than the y-intercept of line l. On the other hand, if the slope of line k is 2 and the slope of line l is 1, then the y-intercept of line k is smaller than the y-intercept of line l. Notice that both of these scenarios satisfy “the slope of line l is positive.” Since we have multiple possible answers to the question, statement two alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
Answer: A
04 Dec 2021, 09:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
In the xy-plane, lines k and l intersect at the point (1,1). Is the y-intercept of k greater than the y-intercept of l?
Lets use the old y = mx+b to solve this equation (Note that b = y - intercept)
We know for both lines that when x =1 y=1 so lets plug both into the equation: 1 = m(1) + B or 1 = M + B. Since I see that my statements below are referencing the value of slope (M) I want to see if I can manipulate the equation to get a clear correlation between m and b. 1 - M = B. Alright so I have my equation, lets see what the statements actually say.
(1) The slope of k is less than the slope of l. Our equation 1 - M = B No matter what, in this equation the less the M value is the greater B will be. Therefore were locked in. If the slope of K is less than the Slope of L then K must have a greater Y - Intercept.
(2) The slope of l is positive.
Doesn't Make a difference. They are trying to trick you into choosing C as a solution with this option.
Lets use the old y = mx+b to solve this equation (Note that b = y - intercept)
We know for both lines that when x =1 y=1 so lets plug both into the equation: 1 = m(1) + B or 1 = M + B. Since I see that my statements below are referencing the value of slope (M) I want to see if I can manipulate the equation to get a clear correlation between m and b. 1 - M = B. Alright so I have my equation, lets see what the statements actually say.
(1) The slope of k is less than the slope of l. Our equation 1 - M = B No matter what, in this equation the less the M value is the greater B will be. Therefore were locked in. If the slope of K is less than the Slope of L then K must have a greater Y - Intercept.
(2) The slope of l is positive.
Doesn't Make a difference. They are trying to trick you into choosing C as a solution with this option.
18 Dec 2022, 17:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
KarishmaB
KarishmaB
If you have time, I would be so appreciative to understand how you may approach this algebraically. I think Brent's response with the graphs are helpful, but for some reason I am still struggling with wondering if there are more cases, so I am hoping to see if there is a way to prove it algebraically. Many thanks
