Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 00:47 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 00:47

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [1]
Given Kudos: 275
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5426 [2]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [1]
Given Kudos: 275
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [0]
Given Kudos: 275
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
abhimahna wrote:
Hi Shiv2016,

Ideally |x| = x if x>0
= -x if x<0

Now looking at your 1st question,

|2x-4|<6

Here |2x-4| can be written as either 2x-4 or -(2x-4)

So, when I take these values in the original question, I will get

2x-4<6 or -(2x-4)<6

=> 2x < 10 or -2x + 4 < 6

=> x<5 or -x < 1

=> x<5 or x > -1

Hence, -1<x<5 is the solution.

Now your 2nd query:

| x-5| >7 => Means that distance of x from 5 on the number line is greater than 7. -- CORRECT (Here, we have 5 as the zero point.)

|x+5|>7 => Can this be true for this as well? -- INCORRECT. Here, we have -5 as the zero point. So, it should be distance of x from -5 on the number line is greater than 7

I would suggest, read the following post to get proper clarity on modulus concept.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/math-absolut ... 86462.html



I will surely go through the absolute value post you have mentioned.

One quick question:
When you considered: -(2x-4)<6

Why did we not reverse the sign because now its negative on left hand side?
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5426 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Shiv2016 wrote:
I will surely go through the absolute value post you have mentioned.

One quick question:
When you considered: -(2x-4)<6

Why did we not reverse the sign because now its negative on left hand side?


We reverse the sign only when we multiply the inequality by a negative sign.

You see I wrote -2x + 4 < 6 then I solved it as -x < 1.

Now since I need x instead of -x , I multiplied the inequlity with -1, hence the sign of the inequality was reversed and we got x > -1.

I hope it makes sense. :)
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [0]
Given Kudos: 275
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
abhimahna wrote:
Shiv2016 wrote:
I will surely go through the absolute value post you have mentioned.

One quick question:
When you considered: -(2x-4)<6

Why did we not reverse the sign because now its negative on left hand side?


We reverse the sign only when we multiply the inequality by a negative sign.

You see I wrote -2x + 4 < 6 then I solved it as -x < 1.

Now since I need x instead of -x , I multiplied the inequlity with -1, hence the sign of the inequality was reversed and we got x > -1.

I hope it makes sense. :)


So in this case, we are not multiplying it by -1 but it is already in that form i.e. positive and negative.

Thanks for you reply.
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [0]
Given Kudos: 275
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
If we read the expression, it means (according to me) that absolute value (i.e. the positive value) of 2x-4 is less than 6.
But when we read the second version, it means that the negative absolute value of -2x+4 is less than 6.


Is it sounding weird or its fine?
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5426 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Shiv2016 wrote:
If we read the expression, it means (according to me) that absolute value (i.e. the positive value) of 2x-4 is less than 6.
But when we read the second version, it means that the negative absolute value of -2x+4 is less than 6.


Is it sounding weird or its fine?


yes, that is true. This is how we read it and everything sounds cool. :)
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 528
Own Kudos [?]: 194 [0]
Given Kudos: 275
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
abhimahna wrote:
Shiv2016 wrote:
If we read the expression, it means (according to me) that absolute value (i.e. the positive value) of 2x-4 is less than 6.
But when we read the second version, it means that the negative absolute value of -2x+4 is less than 6.


Is it sounding weird or its fine?


yes, that is true. This is how we read it and everything sounds cool. :)



That's great. Thanks so much for your reply. Because i have read everywhere that ABSOLUTE VALUE can never be negative, that is what caused me trouble in understanding inequalities+absolute value of an expression.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32679
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Inequalities+absolute value [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92918 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne