I've read through a lot of the posts on here, and I'm left feeling pretty disturbed.
Look, everyone should do what they want to do. Do what makes you happy. Fine. Thing is, we all say that, and then people are lining up begging for information on how to break into an uber-high stress job that will demand 70-80 hours/week minimum (sometimes upwards of 100), frown on you for taking your vacation and require tons of travel. And that's for years. The argument being, of course, that you're getting paid some serious bank for that, and after two or three years, if you're good, maybe you'll bump up, you can make even more, while your hours will moderate only a little. And then, after a few years of that, hopefully, you can jump up again, only work 10 hours a day and travel 2-3 days a week, and make an obscene amount of money. And then you're 40.
I think a question everyone's got to ask themselves is "how much do I need to make to do what I want to do in my life?" Because the rationale everyone reflexively gives here - put the kids through college, own a nice home, drive a decent car, afford to travel, etc. - simply does not require a seven figure salary, except perhaps in the SF Bay area and NYC. So when you talk about attaining the salary of a senior manager at a bulge bracket bank - if your goal is to become really and truly rich - you're effectively talking about mortgaging your late 20s and 30s to reach a (very) high level of income in your 40s. Let's be clear - that's the tradeoff that's being made here.
A disclaimer: I'm 27 and starting my MBA this fall. I'd like to be that rich too, but I probably won't be. I'd rather spend the next 15 years of my life working a 40-50 hour per week job, taking every bit of my four weeks of vacation a year and doing work that is important to me personally, while having a solid relationship with my future wife and, hopefully, kids. If you work 80+ hours a week, I just do not see how you can do that.
Finally, let's take it easy on bashing the rest of the country, all right? I get the feeling that no one on this board has ever lived anywhere but NYC/Boston/Chicago/San Fran/LA. The notion that there's no "culture" or decent restaurants or anything else but in those few cities is just preposterous. How many of you guys living in NYC go regularly to the Met? See the ballet? Hmm. Living in Raleigh, or Atlanta, or Nashville, or Cleveland, or Minneapolis, or Portland, or Phoenix, etc. etc., is not tantamount to social death. Sure, there are some **** cities out there. I wouldn't wanna live in Richmond, Peoria or Cheyenne either. But get a grip. And pulling down $250,000 in any of those cities will allow you to live a very, very rich lifestyle.
</rant>