Last visit was: 15 Jan 2025, 15:12 It is currently 15 Jan 2025, 15:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rxs0005
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Last visit: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 436
Own Kudos:
3,016
 [65]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: PA
Posts: 436
Kudos: 3,016
 [65]
17
Kudos
Add Kudos
48
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,746
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91,794
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,746
Kudos: 694,148
 [39]
21
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EvaJager
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 515
Own Kudos:
2,222
 [6]
Given Kudos: 43
WE:Science (Education)
Posts: 515
Kudos: 2,222
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
abmyers
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Last visit: 31 May 2011
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
140
 [1]
Posts: 70
Kudos: 140
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Proposition 1:

1/X < 1/Y

This is equal to X > Y | x, y both > 0 or both < 0

Case 1: Both > 0. X > Y, therefore X-Y >0 , Y-X <0, so 1/(X-Y) > 0 and Y-X<0 so FALSE

Case 2: X < 0, Y>0. Cross multiple and switch the signs, you get Y>X. There for Y-X>0, X-Y<0.

1/(X-Y)<0, Y-X>0, so case 2, 1/(X-Y) < (Y-X) is TRUE

Therefore statement 1 is insufficient by contradiction.

Proposition 2:

2X=3Y

Case 1: X=3, Y=2 - therefore X-Y=1, Y-X = -1

1/(X-Y) < Y-X ----> 1/1 < -1 = FALSE

Case 2: X=-3, Y=-2 - therefore X-Y=-1, Y-X = 1

1/(X-Y) < Y-X ----> 1/-1 < 1 = TRUE

Insufficient by contradicition

Both Statments together - Intutitively, neither statement removes the ambiguity of the sign of X or Y. I can't think of a proof.

Therefore answer is E.
User avatar
gmatopoeia
Joined: 20 Jul 2011
Last visit: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT Date: 10-21-2011
Posts: 66
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
**
Quote:
Is 1 / (x-y) < y - x?

1. 1 / x < 1 / y
2. 2x = 3y

equation: \(\frac{1}{(x-y)} < y-x\)

Statement 1
Given \(\frac{1}{x}<\frac{1}{y}\), we have 2 possibilities:
One: if both x and y share the same signs (i.e. both are positive or both are negative) --> y<x
left side of equation will be a positive fraction; right side will be negative integer --> equation = true
Two: if x is negative and y is positive (e.g. x=-2 and y=3), left side of equation will be negative fraction; right side will be positive integer --> equation = false
Insufficient.

Statement 2
Given 2x=3y --> x/y = 3/2 -->i.e. x and y share the same sign (i.e. both positive or both negative). 2 possibilities:
One: if both x and y are positive (i.e. x=3, y=2), results in 1/1 < -1 --> equation = false
Two: if both x and y are negative (i.e. x=-3, y=-2), results in 1/-1 < 1 --> equation = true
Insufficient.

Statement 1 + 2
Applying statement 2 and 1 together, we know that x and y:
i. share the same sign, and
ii. that y<x
--> which means, equation = false i.e. No
Sufficient.

Answer: C
User avatar
shankar245
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Last visit: 19 Jun 2015
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Status:Do till 740 :)
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 460 Q35 V20
GPA: 3.6
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 460 Q35 V20
Posts: 61
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Buneul,

Can you please explain this part?
if both are negative cross multiply and flip the sigh twice to get y<x again)
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,746
Own Kudos:
694,148
 [1]
Given Kudos: 91,794
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,746
Kudos: 694,148
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shankar245
Hi Buneul,

Can you please explain this part?
if both are negative cross multiply and flip the sigh twice to get y<x again)

Given: 1/x<1/y. Now, if both x and y are negative, then when we multiply both parts by negative x we should flip the sign and write 1>x/y. Now, multiply both sides by negative y and flip the sign again to get y<x.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
sagarsir
Joined: 28 Dec 2012
Last visit: 11 Oct 2023
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 94
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 88
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stem reduces to Is x<y ? [-1/(y-x) = (y-x) => (y-x) >0 ]

A. Depends on sign of x,y. (both positive or both negative for eg. Vs positive-negative give both YES and NO)
B. x= 3k, y= 2k. K>=0, Answer NO. K<0 Answer is YES.

C.

Using 2. x =3k when y =2k.
using the above in 1. 1/x < 1/ y or 1/3k < 1/2k holds only for k>0. For k>0, Using 2, we definitely get the single answer as NO.



KUDOS, if YOU LIKE
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 25 Sep 2024
Posts: 524
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 524
Kudos: 2,406
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
rxs0005
Is 1 / (x-y) < y - x


1 / x < 1 / y

2x = 3y

First of all if it were realistic GMAT question it would most likely state that \(xy\neq{0}\) and \(x\neq{y}\) (as x, y and x-y are in denominators).

Is \(\frac{1}{x-y}<y-x\)? --> is \(\frac{1}{x-y}+x-y<0\) --> is \(\frac{1+(x-y)^2}{x-y}<0\)? as the nominator (\(1+(x-y)^2\)) is always positive then the question basically becomes whether denominator (\(x-y\)) is negative --> is \(x-y<0\)? or is \(x<y\)?

(1) \(\frac{1}{x}<\frac{1}{y}\) --> if both unknowns are positive or both unknowns are negative then \(y<x\) (if both are positive cross multiply to get \(y<x\) and if both are negative cross multiply and flip the sigh twice to get \(y<x\) again) and the answer will be NO but if \(x<0<y\) given inequality also holds true and in this case the answer will be YES (if \(x\) is any negative number and \(y\) is any positive number then \(\frac{1}{x}=negative<positive=\frac{1}{y}\)). Not sufficient.

(2) \(2x=3y\) --> \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign, next: \(\frac{x}{y}=\frac{3}{2}\): if both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive (for example 3 and 2 respectively) then \(0<y<x\) and the answer will be NO but if both \(x\) and \(y\) are negative (for example -3 and -2 respectively) then \(x<y<0\) and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) As from (2) \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign then from (1) \(y<x\) and the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.

Answer: C.


Hello Bunuel,

Agree with your approach but I wanted to plug in nos and check so here it goes.

we get the expression ( 1+ (x-y)^2 )/(x-y) <0----> Q becomes Is x<y ?

From St 1, we get 1/x<1/y ----> 1/x-1/y <0 and therefore expression becomes

(y-x)/xy < 0 which means is y<x

Now lets take values

y=2 , x=3, the expression is true i.e <0
y=-2 and x=-3, the expression is false ie >0

So not sufficient

from St 2, we get x= 3/2y

Now y=4, x=6, Expression is False ie >0
y=-4, x=-6, expression is true i.e <0
So alone not sufficient

Now Combining we get y<x and x=3/2y ----> y< 3/2y which means Y > 0 and x>y. So we have x>y>0. For this condition, the expression is always false ie. ( 1+ (x-y)^2 )/(x-y) >0

Can't thank you enough in solving inequalities the way you just did.

Thanks
Mridul
User avatar
ronr34
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Last visit: 10 Oct 2014
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 254
Kudos: 246
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
rxs0005
Is 1 / (x-y) < y - x


1 / x < 1 / y

2x = 3y

First of all if it were realistic GMAT question it would most likely state that \(xy\neq{0}\) and \(x\neq{y}\) (as x, y and x-y are in denominators).

Is \(\frac{1}{x-y}<y-x\)? --> is \(\frac{1}{x-y}+x-y<0\) --> is \(\frac{1+(x-y)^2}{x-y}<0\)? as the nominator (\(1+(x-y)^2\)) is always positive then the question basically becomes whether denominator (\(x-y\)) is negative --> is \(x-y<0\)? or is \(x<y\)?

(1) \(\frac{1}{x}<\frac{1}{y}\) --> if both unknowns are positive or both unknowns are negative then \(y<x\) (if both are positive cross multiply to get \(y<x\) and if both are negative cross multiply and flip the sigh twice to get \(y<x\) again) and the answer will be NO but if \(x<0<y\) given inequality also holds true and in this case the answer will be YES (if \(x\) is any negative number and \(y\) is any positive number then \(\frac{1}{x}=negative<positive=\frac{1}{y}\)). Not sufficient.

(2) \(2x=3y\) --> \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign, next: \(\frac{x}{y}=\frac{3}{2}\): if both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive (for example 3 and 2 respectively) then \(0<y<x\) and the answer will be NO but if both \(x\) and \(y\) are negative (for example -3 and -2 respectively) then \(x<y<0\) and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) As from (2) \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign then from (1) \(y<x\) and the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.

Answer: C.
Hi Bunuel.
When taking both statements together, I substituted x=3/2 and y=2/3, or x=-3/2 and y=-2/3
When taking into account statement 1, I noticed that we can't have the negative value for the numbers, as then statement 1 won't hold true.
Is this true? Am I missing something?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 15 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,746
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91,794
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,746
Kudos: 694,148
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ronr34
Bunuel
rxs0005
Is 1 / (x-y) < y - x


1 / x < 1 / y

2x = 3y

First of all if it were realistic GMAT question it would most likely state that \(xy\neq{0}\) and \(x\neq{y}\) (as x, y and x-y are in denominators).

Is \(\frac{1}{x-y}<y-x\)? --> is \(\frac{1}{x-y}+x-y<0\) --> is \(\frac{1+(x-y)^2}{x-y}<0\)? as the nominator (\(1+(x-y)^2\)) is always positive then the question basically becomes whether denominator (\(x-y\)) is negative --> is \(x-y<0\)? or is \(x<y\)?

(1) \(\frac{1}{x}<\frac{1}{y}\) --> if both unknowns are positive or both unknowns are negative then \(y<x\) (if both are positive cross multiply to get \(y<x\) and if both are negative cross multiply and flip the sigh twice to get \(y<x\) again) and the answer will be NO but if \(x<0<y\) given inequality also holds true and in this case the answer will be YES (if \(x\) is any negative number and \(y\) is any positive number then \(\frac{1}{x}=negative<positive=\frac{1}{y}\)). Not sufficient.

(2) \(2x=3y\) --> \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign, next: \(\frac{x}{y}=\frac{3}{2}\): if both \(x\) and \(y\) are positive (for example 3 and 2 respectively) then \(0<y<x\) and the answer will be NO but if both \(x\) and \(y\) are negative (for example -3 and -2 respectively) then \(x<y<0\) and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) As from (2) \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign then from (1) \(y<x\) and the answer to the question is NO. Sufficient.

Answer: C.
Hi Bunuel.
When taking both statements together, I substituted x=3/2 and y=2/3, or x=-3/2 and y=-2/3
When taking into account statement 1, I noticed that we can't have the negative value for the numbers, as then statement 1 won't hold true.
Is this true? Am I missing something?

Yes, when we combine the statements we get that x > y and 2x = 3y, so x > y > 0.
User avatar
asethi
Joined: 08 Sep 2015
Last visit: 08 Jan 2016
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Status:tough ... ? Naaahhh !!!!
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
WE:Marketing (Computer Hardware)
Posts: 58
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi All,
I attended this question quite late from the posting date but i am getting the different answer D.

1) 1/x<1/y --- which means x>y..so for the positive values the given expression holds NO, and for the negaive values X=-1 and Y=-2 (X>Y) the expression says NO.

2) 2x=3y --- which means x>y..so the same solution like above

So both gives the answer.

Can you help.
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,337
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,337
Kudos: 3,717
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
asethi
Hi All,
I attended this question quite late from the posting date but i am getting the different answer D.

1) 1/x<1/y --- which means x>y..so for the positive values the given expression holds NO, and for the negaive values X=-1 and Y=-2 (X>Y) the expression says NO.

2) 2x=3y --- which means x>y..so the same solution like above

So both gives the answer.

Can you help.

Be very careful with multiplying or diving inequalities with variables for which you do not know the signs of.

In this case as well, you do not know whether x and y are both positive or both negative or one negative one positive etc.

Without this information you can not say x>y when you are given 1/x<1/y

Case in point, consider the cases (3,2) and (-2,-3) you get different answers and because of this the first statement is not sufficient.

You are making the same mistake when you are analyzing statement 2 alone.

Make sure to be extra careful when dealing with unknown variables in inequalities.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 36,033
Own Kudos:
Posts: 36,033
Kudos: 941
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
98746 posts