Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 02:35 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 02:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,172
 [8]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,172
 [8]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,700
 [2]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,700
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,070
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,070
Kudos: 19,389
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,337
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is p > q ?

(1) p + r > q + s and r > s
(2) p + s < q + r and s > r

Target question: Is p > q ?

Statement 1: p + r > q + s and r > s
Whenever we're given two inequalities in which the inequality symbols are facing the same direction, we might be able to gain some valuable insights by ADDING the inequalities (see the video below for more on this)

So we can take the following inequalities...
p + r > q + s
r > s
.... and ADD for them to get: p + 2r > q + 2s
This doesn't help us answer the target question.
We can demonstrate this by considering the following values of p, q, r and s that satisfy statement 1:
Case a: p = 1, q = 0, r = 5 and s = 1. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, p is greater than q
Case b: p = 0, q = 1, r = 5 and s = 1. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, p is not greater than q
Since we can’t answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: p + s < q + r and s > r
Since the two inequality symbols aren't facing the same direction, we can't add the inequalities...YET!
One way to get the inequality symbols facing the same direction is to take the second inequality, s > r, and multiply both sides by -1 to get: -s < -r [Note: Since I multiplied both sides by a NEGATIVE value, I REVERSED the direction of the inequality symbol]

At this point, we can take the following inequalities...
p + s < q + r
-s < -r
...and ADD them to get: p < q, which means the definitive answer to the target question is NO, p is not greater than q
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: B

RELATED VIDEO
User avatar
iamcabbage
Joined: 22 Apr 2021
Last visit: 02 Nov 2022
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone clarify this question in a better way? Also, why are we not using the number substitution method in solving both 1 and 2?
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,337
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
iamcabbage
Can someone clarify this question in a better way? Also, why are we not using the number substitution method in solving both 1 and 2?

Number substitution (aka testing values) will only yield definitive results when a statement is not sufficient.
More here: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/articles/da ... lug-values
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,739
Own Kudos:
35,337
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,739
Kudos: 35,337
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is \(p > q\) ?

(1) \(p + r > q + s\) and \(r > s\)
(2) \(p + s < q + r\) and \(s > r\)

Target question: Is p > q?

Statement 1: p + r > q + s and r > s
Important: We must resist the temptation to subtract the second inequality from the first inequality (to incorrectly conclude that p > q).
If we have two inequalities in which the inequality symbols are facing the same direction, we can ADD those inequalities, but we can't subtract them.
For more on this, watch the video below.


If we take...
p + r > q + s
r > s


... and ADD them, we get: p + 2r > q + 2s
There are several values of p, q, r and s that satisfy the inequality p + 2r > q + 2s. Here are two:
Case a: p = 0, q = 1, r = 10 and s = 0. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, p is not greater than q
Case b: p = 1, q = 0, r = 10 and s = 0. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, p is greater than q
Since we can’t answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: p + s < q + r and s > r
In this case, we have 2 inequalities, BUT the inequality symbols are not facing the same direction, which means we can't add them...YET!
Take the inequality s > r, and multiply both sides by -1 to get: -s < -r [notice that, since we multiplied both sides of the inequality by a NEGATIVE value, we had to reverse the direction of the inequality symbol]
We now have the following two inequalities:
p + s < q + r
-s < -r

Now that the inequality symbols are facing the same direction, we can ADD the inequalities to get: p > q. Perfect!
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: B

RELATED VIDEO
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,350
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,350
Kudos: 741
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is \(p > q\) ?

(1) \(p + r > q + s\) and \(r > s\)
(2) \(p + s < q + r\) and \(s > r\)


Rephrased question:

Is: p - q > 0?

Statement 1
p - q > s - r

And we are also given: r > s
Which is the same as:
s - r < 0

So the value of (s - r) = some -negative value

And statement 1 tells us that: (p - q) > that -negative value

So it is possible for:

p - q = -negative
OR
p - q = +positive

S1 NOT Sufficient

Statement 2: tells us that

p - q < r - s …… (inequality I)

And we are also given: s > r
Or
r - s < 0…… (inequality II)

Using the Transitive Property of Inequalities for the one stated above in I and II we can therefore say:

p - q < r - s < 0

Definite NO: the value of (p-q) must be less than < 0 and can NOT be greater than > 0

p - q < 0 —- s2 sufficient alone

*B*

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
aditijain1507
Joined: 16 Nov 2021
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Products:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Both options have different relations between r and s, one says that r>s and other says r<s. Experts, is that possible? Isn't the question incorrect?

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
496 posts