Last visit was: 14 Jun 2025, 10:50 It is currently 14 Jun 2025, 10:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
ColdSushi
Joined: 29 Oct 2014
Last visit: 03 Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
58
 [51]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 15
Kudos: 58
 [51]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
46
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,046
Own Kudos:
73,659
 [14]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,046
Kudos: 73,659
 [14]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,790
Own Kudos:
12,425
 [9]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,790
Kudos: 12,425
 [9]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
ColdSushi
Joined: 29 Oct 2014
Last visit: 03 Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 15
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ColdSushi
Is z>0?
(1) (Z+1)(Z)(Z-1) < 0
(2) |Z|< 1



Could anyone share their workings for this one? I started with (2) because it'd easier to rule out. For (1) I started by expanding the formula out then picked smart numbers. The OA, however, did it by just picking smart numbers without any prework.

I understand how to pick the right smart numbers BUT what I can't work out is what should I look for to determine whether I need to expand or leave the equation as is before I plug in smart numbers?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,046
Own Kudos:
73,659
 [1]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,046
Kudos: 73,659
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ColdSushi
ColdSushi
Is z>0?
(1) (Z+1)(Z)(Z-1) < 0
(2) |Z|< 1



Could anyone share their workings for this one? I started with (2) because it'd easier to rule out. For (1) I started by expanding the formula out then picked smart numbers. The OA, however, did it by just picking smart numbers without any prework.

I understand how to pick the right smart numbers BUT what I can't work out is what should I look for to determine whether I need to expand or leave the equation as is before I plug in smart numbers?

By the way, establishing a statement using "smart numbers" isn't the best idea.
It is easy to negate a statement using numbers but establishing isn't always advisable.

Say, I am given that |Z|< 1. Is Z always positive?
I can negate it by plugging in a single value Z = -1/2. Here Z is negative but 1/2 < 1 holds. So I know that Z is not always positive in this case. Great.

But if I want to establish using both statements that Z must always be positive, I may miss out on testing some important numbers since it must hold for all values of Z. So be careful when you use "smart numbers" in DS questions.
User avatar
Lucky2783
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Last visit: 08 May 2020
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
1,966
 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Concentration: International Business, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Posts: 419
Kudos: 1,966
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ColdSushi
Is z > 0?

(1) (z + 1)(z)(z - 1) < 0
(2) |z| < 1


Option A: (z + 1)(z)(z - 1) < 0
implies 0<Z<1 OR Z<-1 NOT SUFFICIENT.

Option B: |z| < 1 implies -1<Z<1 NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining Together

0<Z<1 SUFFICIENT.

ANSWER C.
avatar
ColdSushi
Joined: 29 Oct 2014
Last visit: 03 Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 15
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks very much guys - really appreciate your explanations.
User avatar
eddy8700
Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Last visit: 02 Oct 2020
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Status:active
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 4
WE:Web Development (Computer Software)
Posts: 87
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is z > 0?

(1) (z + 1)(z)(z - 1) < 0
(2) |z| < 1

answer is C

1 not suff z=0.5 and z =-2
2 not suff -1<z<1

combining we get
sufficient in the range of 0<z<1
User avatar
SonGoku
Joined: 11 May 2018
Last visit: 25 Dec 2022
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
88
 [1]
Given Kudos: 287
Products:
Posts: 121
Kudos: 88
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Is z > 0?

(1) (z + 1)(z)(z - 1) < 0
(2) |z| < 1

Statement 1:

-1 0 1
From 1 we can deduce
Z<-1
-1<z<0
0<z<1
z>1
Many cases So we cannot say whether Z>0.Not Sufficient
Statement 2:
From 2 we can get:
-1<z<1
positive or negative so not sufficient

1+2
here still 2 cases can be possible right?
Because we have

-1<z<0
0<z<1

in statement 1 .
These 2 cases are satisfied in both statements and two possible solutions.
Please help me where I am going wrong
Bunuel
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,790
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,790
Kudos: 12,425
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi SonGoku,

You made a minor mistake when dealing with Fact 1. There are a couple of different 'ranges' of values that will fit...

(Z + 1)(Z)(Z - 1) < 0

Z < -1 and 0 < Z < 1 are both possibilities.

However, -1 < Z < 0 is NOT an option. With a bit more work, you'll find that the ONLY possibilities that will fit BOTH Facts are when Z is a positive fraction.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
SonGoku
Joined: 11 May 2018
Last visit: 25 Dec 2022
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 287
Products:
Posts: 121
Kudos: 88
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi SonGoku,

You made a minor mistake when dealing with Fact 1. There are a couple of different 'ranges' of values that will fit...

(Z + 1)(Z)(Z - 1) < 0

Z < -1 and 0 < Z < 1 are both possibilities.

However, -1 < Z < 0 is NOT an option. With a bit more work, you'll find that the ONLY possibilities that will fit BOTH Facts are when Z is a positive fraction.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Thanks for the reply
But why can’t we deduce-1<z<0 from statement 1 ?
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,790
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,790
Kudos: 12,425
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi SonGoku,

Consider what would happen to each of the 3 parentheses if -1 < Z < 0 (meaning that Z is a negative fraction)....

(Z + 1)(Z)(Z - 1) < 0

With any negative fraction in place for Z, we would end up with a product that is...

( + )( - )( - ) = POSITIVE

For example, if Z = -0.5.....
(-0.5 + 1)(-0.5)(-0.5 - 1)
(+0.5)(-0.5)(-1.5) = +.375

This does NOT fit what we were told; the product is supposed to be NEGATIVE. Thus, Z cannot be in the range -1 < Z < 0.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
aj3001
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: India
GPA: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question: Is z>0?
(1) (z+1)(z)(z-1)<0
(2) |z| <1

Both the statements are insufficient independently however they are sufficient together. (C)

But in explanation of trying to prove (2) insufficient to strike option B and D, they have tested three cases using -2, ½, -½.
On testing each of the three cases they have considered the following:
a) -2: 2<1 Not considered
b) ½: ½<1 so z>0 Yes
c) -½: -½<1 so z>0 No

But my doubt is that in the third case shouldn't the answer be yes as the modulus changes the sign of any value inside it to positive? Wont |-½| = ½?
But in the answer they have considered |-½|= -½

Please clarify. Thanks in advance.
User avatar
Salsanousi
Joined: 19 Oct 2013
Last visit: 29 Dec 2020
Posts: 399
Own Kudos:
343
 [1]
Given Kudos: 117
Location: Kuwait
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Posts: 399
Kudos: 343
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aj3001
Question: Is z>0?
(1) (z+1)(z)(z-1)<0
(2) |z| <1

Both the statements are insufficient independently however they are sufficient together. (C)

But in explanation of trying to prove (2) insufficient to strike option B and D, they have tested three cases using -2, ½, -½.
On testing each of the three cases they have considered the following:
a) -2: 2<1 Not considered
b) ½: ½<1 so z>0 Yes
c) -½: -½<1 so z>0 No

But my doubt is that in the third case shouldn't the answer be yes as the modulus changes the sign of any value inside it to positive? Wont |-½| = ½?
But in the answer they have considered |-½|= -½

Please clarify. Thanks in advance.

For statement one

We have z (z-1) (z +1) < 0

3 different values multipled it means either all are negative or only one is negative. This way we cannot tell whether z is negative or z - 1 etc..

For statement two

z < 1
- z < 1 this then becomes z > -1

-1 < z < 1

Pick z = 1/2 or - 1/2

|1/2| = 1/2 < 1 (satisfies the statement) but is z > 0? Yes.

| -1/2 | = 1/2 < 1(satisfies the statement)

But is z > 0? No.

I think something went off on the explanation.

Now combined we know z is between 1 and -1

So for the first statement to be negative z has to be a positive number less than 1

The reason is

1/2 * (1/2 - 1) * (1/2 + 1)

1/2 * (- 1/2) * (3/2) < 0

If z was negative then it would be -1/2

This way it becomes -1/2 * (-3/2) * 1/2 which invalidates the statement.

Since z has to be a positive number less than 1.

We have an answer.

Hope this helps!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
aj3001
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: India
GPA: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Salsanousi
aj3001
Question: Is z>0?
(1) (z+1)(z)(z-1)<0
(2) |z| <1

Both the statements are insufficient independently however they are sufficient together. (C)

But in explanation of trying to prove (2) insufficient to strike option B and D, they have tested three cases using -2, ½, -½.
On testing each of the three cases they have considered the following:
a) -2: 2<1 Not considered
b) ½: ½<1 so z>0 Yes
c) -½: -½<1 so z>0 No

But my doubt is that in the third case shouldn't the answer be yes as the modulus changes the sign of any value inside it to positive? Wont |-½| = ½?
But in the answer they have considered |-½|= -½

Please clarify. Thanks in advance.

For statement one

We have z (z-1) (z +1) < 0

3 different values multipled it means either all are negative or only one is negative. This way we cannot tell whether z is negative or z - 1 etc..

For statement two

z < 1
- z < 1 this then becomes z > -1

-1 < z < 1

Pick z = 1/2 or - 1/2

|1/2| = 1/2 < 1 (satisfies the statement) but is z > 0? Yes.

| -1/2 | = 1/2 < 1(satisfies the statement)

But is z > 0? No.

I think something went off on the explanation.

Now combined we know z is between 1 and -1

So for the first statement to be negative z has to be a positive number less than 1

The reason is

1/2 * (1/2 - 1) * (1/2 + 1)

1/2 * (- 1/2) * (3/2) < 0

If z was negative then it would be -1/2

This way it becomes -1/2 * (-3/2) * 1/2 which invalidates the statement.

Since z has to be a positive number less than 1.

We have an answer.

Hope this helps!

Posted from my mobile device

Thank you so much. Your explanation makes a lot of sense. There is a typo in the book. Thanks a lot!
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 14 June 2025
Posts: 8,235
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
Posts: 8,235
Kudos: 4,737
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ColdSushi
Is z > 0?

(1) (z + 1)(z)(z - 1) < 0
(2) |z| < 1


target is z>0
#1
(z + 1)(z)(z - 1) < 0
possible when z=1/2 , -2,-3
insufficient
#2
|z| < 1
range of values of z
-1<z<1
insufficient clearly
from 1 &2
z = 1/2 only possible
hence sufficient option c
User avatar
Mck2023
Joined: 23 Feb 2020
Last visit: 09 Jun 2023
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 297
Location: Nepal
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
Posts: 131
Kudos: 88
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
ColdSushi
Is z>0?
(1) (Z+1)(Z)(Z-1) < 0
(2) |Z|< 1


Is Z > 0

(1) (Z+1)(Z)(Z-1) < 0
There are 3 transition points -1, 0 and 1. The expression will be negative if Z < -1 or 0 < Z < 1. If you are not sure how we got this, check: https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2012/06 ... e-factors/

So Z may be positive or negative in this range. Not sufficient.

(2) |Z|< 1
-1 < Z < 1
Z may be positive or negative in this range. Not sufficient.

Which range of Z satisfies both inequalities? 0 < Z < 1
In this range, Z is always positive. Sufficient.

Answer (C)

Hi VeritasKarishma
Thank you for the explanation.
I have a small doubt, though.
Taking two statement together, I chose option E. (Please don't mind the grammatical error in my sentence.)
I could not internalize this part: (Which range of Z satisfies both inequalities? 0 < Z < 1). Why did we not took other unsatisfied range into consideration and thus chose option E. Please shed some light. Thank you.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,046
Own Kudos:
73,659
 [1]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,046
Kudos: 73,659
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mck2023
VeritasKarishma
ColdSushi
Is z>0?
(1) (Z+1)(Z)(Z-1) < 0
(2) |Z|< 1


Is Z > 0

(1) (Z+1)(Z)(Z-1) < 0
There are 3 transition points -1, 0 and 1. The expression will be negative if Z < -1 or 0 < Z < 1. If you are not sure how we got this, check: https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2012/06 ... e-factors/

So Z may be positive or negative in this range. Not sufficient.

(2) |Z|< 1
-1 < Z < 1
Z may be positive or negative in this range. Not sufficient.

Which range of Z satisfies both inequalities? 0 < Z < 1
In this range, Z is always positive. Sufficient.

Answer (C)

Hi VeritasKarishma
Thank you for the explanation.
I have a small doubt, though.
Taking two statement together, I chose option E. (Please don't mind the grammatical error in my sentence.)
I could not internalize this part: (Which range of Z satisfies both inequalities? 0 < Z < 1). Why did we not took other unsatisfied range into consideration and thus chose option E. Please shed some light. Thank you.

This has to do with understanding the way DS questions are formulated.
You are asked: Is Z > 0?

Hint 1 gives to you is: (Z+1)(Z)(Z-1) < 0
You can rewrite this as Z < -1 or 0 < Z < 1.
So you know now that either Z is less than -1 or between 0 and 1. Can you say whether Z is positive? No. It may or may not be.

Hint 2 given to you is: |Z|< 1
You can rewrite this as -1 < Z < 1.
So you know now that Z lies between -1 and 1. Can you say whether Z is positive? No. It may or may not be.

Using both the hints (statements), you know that "either Z is less than -1 or between 0 and 1" and also that "Z lies between -1 and 1". Both statements need to be satisfied.
"Z must be either less than -1 or between 0 and 1" AND "Z must lie between -1 and 1".
Both can hold only if Z lies between 0 and 1 (e.g. say if Z = 0.5, it works. If Z = -0.5 or -2 etc, it doesn't work. One or the other condition is not met.)

So Z must lie between 0 and 1 only.
avatar
mgan
Joined: 11 Oct 2021
Last visit: 29 May 2022
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 39
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1) Could we simplify: (z+1)(z)(z-1)<0
=> (z^2-1)(z)<0
=> z^3-z<0
=> z^3<z
this way we know that z could be either positive fraction or a negative number more than 1?

(2) |z|<1
z could be positive and negative fractions.

(1) and (2)
from (1) could be positive fraction or a negative number more than 1
from (2) could be positive or negative fractions.
The only thing that overlaps is positive fraction.

Therefore, the answer is C

Could this way of solving work?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,046
Own Kudos:
73,659
 [1]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,046
Kudos: 73,659
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mgan
(1) Could we simplify: (z+1)(z)(z-1)<0
=> (z^2-1)(z)<0
=> z^3-z<0
=> z^3<z
this way we know that z could be either positive fraction or a negative number more than 1?

(2) |z|<1
z could be positive and negative fractions.

(1) and (2)
from (1) could be positive fraction or a negative number more than 1
from (2) could be positive or negative fractions.
The only thing that overlaps is positive fraction.

Therefore, the answer is C

Could this way of solving work?

Yes you can provided you know and understand the relations between a number and its squares, cubes, square roots, absolute values etc.
How do you arrive at "either a positive fraction or a negative number less than -1"? If you understand these number properties well, it's great!
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
102016 posts
424 posts