NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 17:29 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 17:29
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
B
dominicraj
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 715 [47]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   09 Jun 2015, 00:53
7
Kudos
39
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:20) correct 41% (02:26) wrong based on 1494 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recognized to have solved the Hilbert Conjecture. Ghosh posted his work on the internet,rather than submitting it to established journals. In fact, he has no job, let alone a university position; he lives alone and has refused all acclaim. In reporting on Ghosh, the press unfortunately has reinforced the popular view that mathematicians are antisocial loners. But mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community,frequently collaborating on important efforts; indeed, teams of researchers are working together to extend Ghosh's findings.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following
roles?

(A) The first is an observation the author makes to illustrate a social pattern; the second is a generalization of that pattern.

(B) The first is evidence in favor of the popular view expressed in the argument;the second is a brief restatement of that view.

(C) The first is a specific example of a generalization that the author contradicts;the second is a reiteration of that generalization.

(D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.

(E) The first is a judgment that counters the primary assertion expressed in the argument; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is based.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
B
dominicraj
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 289
Own Kudos [?]: 715 [6]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   19 Jun 2015, 07:58
5
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
The author's conclusion is that mathematicians actually form a tightly knit community. The

counterargument is that mathematicians are antisocial loners. Now, label each statement as

either Conclusion, Premise For, or Premise Against. In the above argument, the first boldface

represents an example that supports the counterargument. Thus, the first statement is

Premise Against. The second boldface represents the author's conclusion. Now we can write

down our assessment of the boldface statements:

#1 = Premise against

#2 = Conclusion

Turning to the answer choices, we should assess each one methodically.

Evaluate the first half of choice (A) first. This says that the author uses this statement to

illustrate a social pattern. In other words, this choice asserts that statement #1 is Premise

For. We have labeled the first statement as Premise Against, so this choice is incorrect.

The first half of choice (B) says the first statement supports the popular view. The popular

view is the counterargument, so this choice argues that #1 is Premise Against. The second

half of choice (B),.hoWever, says that the second statement is the popular view. The second

statement is the author's conclusion, not the counterargument. Eliminate this 'choice.

The first half of choice (C) says that the first statement is an example of the counterargument

(in other words, Premise Against). The second half of choice (C) says that the second

statement reiterates the counterargument, but the second statement is the author's own conclusion.

Eliminate this choice.

The first half of choice (D) says that the first statement is a counterexample to the author's

conclusion (in other words, Premise Against). The second half of choice (D) says that the

second statement is the author's conclusion. We agree with these labels, so this is the correct

answer. As always, you. should read all the answer choices, but you may be at the twominute

mark already, in which case you should select (D) and move on.

The first half of choice (E) says that the first statement is a premise against the author's conclusion

(in other words, Premise Against). The second half of this choice, however, says that

the second statement is another Premise Against. Eliminate this choice.
General Discussion
avatar
shriramvelamuri
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 164
Own Kudos [?]: 125 [1]
Given Kudos: 113
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   19 Jun 2015, 07:20
1
Kudos
Hey Dom,

I like Option C. but the OA is Option D. Do you have any OE for this. Of course, I am not expert at Boldface questions.

dominicraj wrote:
Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recognized to have solved the Hilbert Conjecture. Ghosh posted his work on the internet,rather than submitting it to established journals. In fact, he has no job, let alone a university position; he lives alone and has refused all acclaim. In reporting on Ghosh, the press unfortunately has reinforced the popular view that mathematicians are antisocial loners. But mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community,frequently collaborating on important efforts; indeed, teams of researchers are working together to extend Ghosh's findings.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following
roles?

(A) The first is an observation the author makes to illustrate a social pattern; the second is a generalization of that pattern.

(B) The first is evidence in favor of the popular view expressed in the argument;the second is a brief restatement of that view.

(C) The first is a specific example of a generalization that the author contradicts;the second is a reiteration of that generalization.

(D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.

(E) The first is a judgment that counters the primary assertion expressed in the argument; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is based.
User avatar
B
kuvshah
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
GMAT 1: 540 Q35 V29
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   01 Feb 2017, 17:59
Hello,

the OA is D - however I have some doubts. (D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.

It says the first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that author asserts and second is that generalization. I am not sure if I understood that correctly.

The way I read this is - "mathematicians are antisocial loners" - is the generalization and "he has no job, let alone a university position" kind of supports that generalization. None of this is what author asserts. It's the opposite of what author concludes.

what am I missing?
User avatar
B
pafrompa
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   01 Feb 2017, 19:56
kuvshah wrote:
Hello,

the OA is D - however I have some doubts. (D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.

It says the first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that author asserts and second is that generalization. I am not sure if I understood that correctly.

The way I read this is - "mathematicians are antisocial loners" - is the generalization and "he has no job, let alone a university position" kind of supports that generalization. None of this is what author asserts. It's the opposite of what author concludes.

what am I missing?



I think you are missing the point "generalization that the author asserts." The author never asserts that math people are antisocial individuals; rather, he advocates that they are a tight nit community. Therefore, the fact that the mathmatician has no job is a counterpoint to the author's generalization that they are a tight nit social community.
User avatar
B
kuvshah
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 18
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
GMAT 1: 540 Q35 V29
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   01 Feb 2017, 20:18
pafrompa wrote:
kuvshah wrote:
Hello,

the OA is D - however I have some doubts. (D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.

It says the first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that author asserts and second is that generalization. I am not sure if I understood that correctly.

The way I read this is - "mathematicians are antisocial loners" - is the generalization and "he has no job, let alone a university position" kind of supports that generalization. None of this is what author asserts. It's the opposite of what author concludes.

what am I missing?



I think you are missing the point "generalization that the author asserts." The author never asserts that math people are antisocial individuals; rather, he advocates that they are a tight nit community. Therefore, the fact that the mathmatician has no job is a counterpoint to the author's generalization that they are a tight nit social community.


I thought so. So here generalization is referring to Author's assertion that "mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community" ?
User avatar
B
rakaisraka
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 80
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   02 Feb 2017, 01:22
Hi Experts , what is wrong with option B:
As per me - BF1 is indeed a Fact/evidence which is in favour of the poplar view ( Mathematicians are not social). BF2 can be taken as restatement of the view that they are social. Dont know what is wrong.
User avatar
B
rakaisraka
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 72
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 80
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   02 Feb 2017, 01:23
Hi Experts , what is wrong with option B:
As per me - BF1 is indeed a Fact/evidence which is in favour of the poplar view ( Mathematicians are not social). BF2 can be taken as restatement of the view that they are social. Dont know what is wrong.
User avatar
G
sayantanc2k
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   02 Feb 2017, 05:51
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
rakaisraka wrote:
Hi Experts , what is wrong with option B:
As per me - BF1 is indeed a Fact/evidence which is in favour of the poplar view ( Mathematicians are not social). BF2 can be taken as restatement of the view that they are social. Dont know what is wrong.


BF1 are BF2 are opposing statements. The term "restatement" indicates that both statements are on the same side. Hence B is wrong.

(One quick technique to eliminate a few answers in a BF type question is to quickly identify whether the statements are on the same side or opposing each other.)
User avatar
B
pafrompa
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   02 Feb 2017, 09:10
kuvshah wrote:
pafrompa wrote:
kuvshah wrote:
Hello,

the OA is D - however I have some doubts. (D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.

It says the first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that author asserts and second is that generalization. I am not sure if I understood that correctly.

The way I read this is - "mathematicians are antisocial loners" - is the generalization and "he has no job, let alone a university position" kind of supports that generalization. None of this is what author asserts. It's the opposite of what author concludes.

what am I missing?



I think you are missing the point "generalization that the author asserts." The author never asserts that math people are antisocial individuals; rather, he advocates that they are a tight nit community. Therefore, the fact that the mathmatician has no job is a counterpoint to the author's generalization that they are a tight nit social community.


I thought so. So here generalization is referring to Author's assertion that "mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community" ?


Correct, because that is the generalization "that the author asserts." It is a generalization that mathematicians are loners, but it's not the one put forward by the author.
User avatar
Azimuwed
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 May 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   03 Oct 2017, 10:35
Can someone help me understand the answers between C and D? 'cos they are close to each other. Thanks!

Sent from my General Mobile 4G Dual using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
avatar
G
Raksat
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 154
Own Kudos [?]: 438 [0]
Given Kudos: 489
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   14 Feb 2018, 22:54
BF1 : he has no job, let alone a university position. A premise which provides a specific example of a generalization that "mathematicians are antisocial loners"
BF2 : mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community. A Generalized main conclusion that the author supports.

A: The first is an observation the author makes to illustrate a social pattern; the second is a generalization of that pattern
Wrong. Both one and second are saying different things. The second is a generalization of a different pattern.

B: The first is evidence in favor of the popular view expressed in the argument;the second is a brief restatement of that view.
The second is not a brief restatement of the first view but rather endorses a different view. Eliminate B
C: The first is a specific example of a generalization that the author contradicts;the second is a reiteration of that generalization
The first statement is ok but the second "the second is a reiteration of that generalization" is incorrect. The second presents a different conclusion endorsed by the author.
D: The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.
Correct . The BF1 is supporting a different conclusion that the argument endorses. The BF2 is that conclusion.
E: The first is a judgment that counters the primary assertion expressed in the argument; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is based.
Easy to eliminate.
User avatar
P
jabhatta2
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1374
Own Kudos [?]: 207 [0]
Given Kudos: 189
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   23 Jan 2020, 17:48
Hello experts -- GMATNinja, gmat1393, GMATNinjaTwo, nightblade354, iamsiddharthkapoor

Per the guide, it is said BF2 is the conclusion of the argument

Just wondering if you agree with this ?

When i read this argument -- i thought the conclusion was NOT BF2 but rather unsaid

BF2 seemed to me a premise towards a unsaid conclusion (In my mind -- unsaid conclusion was, the popular view that mathematicians are antisocial loners was indeed incorrect and BF2 was a premise instead)
avatar
B
sgaaa
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2018
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [2]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   23 Apr 2020, 05:00
2
Kudos
The second boldface says "mathematicians actually form a tight-knit community." This is a generalization because it cannot be true for ALL mathematicians. Instead, the author means to suggest that in general mathematicians form a tight-knit community. This is made more clear by the fact that Ghosh, the mathematician in question, is NOT part of a tight-knit community. Hence, it would not make sense to declare as fact the idea that all mathematicians form a community.
User avatar
P
Crytiocanalyst
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 994
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   20 Jul 2021, 03:12
(A) The first is an observation the author makes to illustrate a social pattern; the second is a generalization of that pattern.
It is not a generalization of the same pattern but rather counterstating of what the people think

(B) The first is evidence in favor of the popular view expressed in the argument;the second is a brief restatement of that view.
first half id true to an extend however the second half is not just a restatement but rather countering this trend

(C) The first is a specific example of a generalization that the author contradicts;the second is a reiteration of that generalization.
Author is not condracting but rather stating that the generalization is not correct

(D) The first is a specific counterexample to a generalization that the author asserts;the second is that generalization.
This nails down the argument the author wanted to express

(E) The first is a judgment that counters the primary assertion expressed in the argument; the second is a circumstance on which that judgment is based
Completely out without a question this doesn't make sense
Hence IMO D
User avatar
L
IanStewart
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9244 [0]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   20 Jul 2021, 04:16
Expert Reply
I don't really like D as an answer here, though it's better than the rest. In informal language, when we talk about a "generalization", we're describing a conclusion that is unfair or false (as wiktionary says, "an oversimplified or exaggerated conception, opinion, or image of the members of a group"). And the language in this question is so informal (some of it even ungrammatical) that I would interpret "generalization" to have its common meaning. The only generalization of this type in the context of the argument is the "view that mathematicians are antisocial loners", but answer D instead describes the "mathematicians form a community" as the "generalization" in the stem.

"Generalization" can have a more formal meaning in logic -- it can refer to a conclusion reached by generalizing from examples. But we can't characterize the phrase "mathematicians clearly form a tightly knit community" as a generalization under that definition either, because we don't know how the author reached that conclusion. So I don't think D is precisely characterizing the roles of the bolded portions. The first portion should instead be characterized as "a generalization the author disputes".

And if this were a real GMAT question, the passage would be based on actual facts, but this passage is completely fictional.
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17221
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink] New post   16 Jan 2024, 00:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Mathematician: Recently, Zubin Ghosh made headlines when he was recogn [#permalink]
16 Jan 2024, 00:23
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions